一键导入
launch-sequence
Run the full pre-launch gauntlet (first-contact → support-storm → trust-audit → pre-mortem) and get a single GO/CAUTION/NO-GO verdict.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Run the full pre-launch gauntlet (first-contact → support-storm → trust-audit → pre-mortem) and get a single GO/CAUTION/NO-GO verdict.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Audit chezmoi dotfiles for drift, unmanaged files, and broken agent skill symlinks across Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, and other harnesses.
Scan Claude/Codex session logs to find agent behavior patterns, Toolsmith adoption gaps, repeated frustrations, and candidates for new skills/tools.
Generate user-facing changelog entries from git history — plain language, audience-segmented, with optional CHANGELOG.md update.
Consolidate/dedupe contacts from macOS, iCloud, Google, Zoho, or VCF with provenance-aware review, backups, and optional approved dossiers.
Capture a technical or product decision with chosen option, rejected alternatives, and rationale — in a format a future agent can read to reconstruct context.
Audit repos for SHA/digest dependency pinning and release cooldowns across Docker, CI, and major language ecosystems; report violations, fix with approval.
| name | launch-sequence |
| description | Run the full pre-launch gauntlet (first-contact → support-storm → trust-audit → pre-mortem) and get a single GO/CAUTION/NO-GO verdict. |
| display_name | Launch Sequence |
| brand_color | #0D9488 |
| local_only | false |
| group | Product & Launch |
| usage | /launch-sequence:run |
| summary | Run the whole pre-launch gauntlet in one pass and get a single go / caution / no-go call. |
| default_prompt | Run the full pre-launch sequence on this product or feature. Surface every risk across first-run experience, support load, trust surface, and catastrophic failure modes. |
The pre-launch gauntlet. Chains four analysis skills into a single synthesized verdict so you can't accidentally skip one.
Ask (or infer from context) the minimum needed to run the gauntlet:
If all four are clear from context, proceed immediately without asking.
Launch all four constituent analysis passes in parallel as subagents. Each subagent gets the same context brief plus its specific mandate.
PRODUCT: [product name and one-line description]
AUDIENCE: [who this is for]
LAUNCH: [when and how]
SUCCESS: [what good looks like]
Subagent 1 — First-Run Red-Team (mandate of first-contact skill) Simulate the experience of a brand-new user encountering this product for the first time. Find every place they get confused, think it's broken, fail to understand the value, or abandon setup. Look for: unclear onboarding, missing zero-state guidance, confusing first action, misleading UI text, setup friction that filters out valid users.
Subagent 2 — Support Load Forecast (mandate of support-storm skill) Simulate the first 2 weeks of support emails, 1-star reviews, Reddit posts, and bug reports this launch will generate. Generate 10-15 realistic examples. Identify which signal a product bug vs. user confusion vs. unmet expectation. Find the 3 changes that would eliminate the most tickets.
Subagent 3 — Trust Surface Audit (mandate of trust-audit skill) Audit this product for everything that could make a user feel unsafe, surveilled, surprised, or deceived. Cover: permissions requested vs. permissions needed, data retention and deletion, billing surprises, silent mutations to user files or state, anything that "feels creepy" even if technically legal.
Subagent 4 — Pre-Mortem (mandate of pre-mortem skill) Assume it is 6 months after launch and the product failed. Write the postmortem. What were the actual causes? Find the top 5-7 failure modes most specific to THIS product and audience. For each: estimated probability, user impact, recovery path. Rank by (probability × impact).
After all four subagents complete, synthesize their findings:
Issues that appear in 2+ analyses or represent catastrophic user harm.
Single-analysis findings that are real but survivable.
Choose one:
🟢 GO — No blocking issues. Non-blocking issues are documented. Launch when ready.
🟡 CAUTION — 1-2 blocking issues with clear, fast fixes. Launch after addressing.
🔴 NO-GO — 3+ blocking issues or one catastrophic finding. Fix before launching.
## Launch Sequence Report
**Verdict: [🟢 GO / 🟡 CAUTION / 🔴 NO-GO]**
### Blocking Issues
- [Issue from which analysis] [description] [suggested fix]
### Non-Blocking Issues
- [Issue] [suggested fix]
### Key Themes
[2-3 sentences on the most common cross-analysis patterns]
### What to Do Next
[Numbered list of immediate actions, ordered by priority]