菜单
Review code, docs, or plans for correctness risks, missing evidence, unclear tradeoffs, and untested assumptions.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Audit an answer or implementation against primary sources before recommending changes.
Evaluate benchmark design for fair baselines, measurable outcomes, leakage, cherry-picking, and reproducibility.
Review a large question by staying inside one assigned slice, then support synthesis across several focused shard answers.
Check whether a change is ready for a public release candidate across packaging, docs, tests, and rollback risk.
| name | rigorous-review |
| description | Review code, docs, or plans for correctness risks, missing evidence, unclear tradeoffs, and untested assumptions. |
| license | MIT |
Review the request as a skeptical engineering reviewer.
Prioritize:
Return findings first. Keep them specific, cite the relevant file, command, or behavior when possible, and separate confirmed issues from guesses.
