菜单
Checks a submitted PR against the environment's baseline assets (CLAUDE.md, memory, naming, asset classification) and attaches a review comment with a merge recommendation. 5 steps — diff read, 8-area consistency check, self-catch, comment, merge recommendation.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Routes a proposed skill, plugin, or agent to its correct home — forge-harness (FH) meta-skill, project-local agent, or drop — by applying a 4-criteria meta-skill bar followed by a project-local value test.
Reduces token waste in Claude Code sessions across two axes — context footprint (auto-generates .claudeignore, guides over-read files and /clear timing) and command output (routes to a command-output proxy/hook such as rtk to trim verbose CLI stdout). In hub environments, regularly audits bloated CLAUDE.md/MEMORY.md/memory/*.md files and proposes compression. Usable standalone without a hub clone.
Mines improvement insights from long-form AI dialogue logs and long texts — an external or pasted corpus, not the current session (current-session wrap-up belongs to harvest-loop). First operation is sycophancy removal — separates speakers, strips the counterpart's agreement/restatement spans, converts the user's own utterances into falsifiable propositions, and labels each proposition induced (frame first introduced by the counterpart) or independent (originated with the user). Ships a drop counter so removed material is visible, never silently lost. Triggered by "mine insights from this chat log", "이 대화록에서 통찰 캐줘", "strip the agreement and show me what's actually mine", "동조 걷어내고 알맹이만", "what did I actually contribute in this thread".
Collects the latest AI/harness engineering trends from HackerNews and arxiv, then synthesizes them into actionable insights directly relevant to forge-harness operations. Triggered by "AI trends", "latest trends", "this week's AI updates", "what's on the frontier", "harness trends", "frontier-digest".
Scans a project's harness structure (.claude/ directory, CLAUDE.md, rules, agents) to diagnose complexity, drift, missing files, and broken references, then suggests improvements. `--lint` flag adds language-pattern scan (self-marketing, cushion words, version brags). Triggered by "harness check", "structure diagnosis", "CLAUDE.md audit".
Reads the current work context and plans the optimal agent dispatch. Clarifies direction with 1-2 questions when unclear; infers and proceeds immediately when execution path is unclear. Runs an automatic recording gate after each Wave completes. Triggered by "compose agents", "which agent should I use?", "run in parallel", or "agent-composer".
| name | hub-cc-pr-reviewer |
| description | Checks a submitted PR against the environment's baseline assets (CLAUDE.md, memory, naming, asset classification) and attaches a review comment with a merge recommendation. 5 steps — diff read, 8-area consistency check, self-catch, comment, merge recommendation. |
| user-invocable | true |
| allowed-tools | ["Bash","Read","Grep","Glob"] |
| model | sonnet |
| complexity_routing | {"base":"sonnet","high":"opus","escalate_when":["adversarial","cross_project","high_stakes"]} |
Note: The original developer is the forge-harness original developer (development source + meta-monitoring home). In external user install environments, the install environment user themselves is the baseline integrity gate operator (following path B generalization baseline /
SKILL_detail.md §External User Environment Adaptation Path§).
When a PR is submitted, checks consistency against the user environment's baseline assets (CLAUDE.md · memory · naming · asset classification) and attaches a review comment. 5-step: diff read → 8-matrix check → self-catch → comment attachment → merge recommendation.
| Example phrasing | Intent |
|---|---|
| "Is it okay to submit this PR?" | PR review request |
| "This change seems inconsistent with existing rules" | Baseline consistency check |
| "Please review before merging" | PR review gate |
| "Does this change affect other parts?" | Consistency check |
Activation criteria: "Review PR #N" / "Add review comment" / "Baseline check" → Run this skill directly
(pr-review-watcher deprecated as of v0.2.0 — recommend using gh pr view --json reviews directly)
Exceptions (this skill does NOT apply):
Read the PR diff + metadata. If this cc authored the change, the diff read can be skipped (directly state changed areas in PR body).
Detail: See
SKILL_detail.md §Step 1 Diff Read—gh pr diff+gh pr viewcommands — read when executing the diff read.
| # | Area | Check path |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | CLAUDE.md (hub identity + asset ownership + sync policy) | Grep PR diff vs CLAUDE.md baseline areas |
| 2 | Memory accumulation (accumulated naming/decision baseline + asset synergy branch judgment + active onboarding + bidirectional self-validation, etc.) | Grep PR diff vs memory feedback_*.md key areas (External environment: skip this item if memory files absent → SKILL_detail.md §External User Environment Adaptation Path §) |
| 3 | Naming baseline (accumulated naming baseline + new naming candidate area) | Catch new naming candidates from PR diff / check adherence to existing naming |
| 4 | Asset synergy branch judgment (meta/hub seed vs action leader persistent location) | Check PR changed asset location consistency |
| 5 | Simplification guard (P15 asymmetry catch + R7 over-engineering) | New asset creation vs existing asset reinforcement judgment / body length check |
| 6 | Dimension separation baseline (## Plugins / ## Skills / ## Agents) | Check dimension separation consistency on CATALOG changes |
| 7 | Branch criteria (large decision PR mandatory vs small patch direct push) | Check if PR is a large decision area (Option C Hybrid) |
| 8 | Hub gate operation consistency | Check if PR itself is a hub gate operation proof path |
Matrix result = Consistent ✅ / Partially Consistent ⚠️ / Inconsistent ❌.
Self-precision catch areas after first cc review (following previous PR self-catch patterns):
Self-catch areas 0 items = skip this entire catch matrix (no token-filling / following feedback_simplification_evidence).
Attach the review comment (8-matrix results + self-catch + refinement suggestions + merge recommendation) via gh pr comment. Within this skill's execution authority (automatic).
Detail: See
SKILL_detail.md §Step 4 Comment Template—gh pr commentheredoc template — read when attaching the comment.
User decision delegation (this skill = review/recording automation / no merge authority):
enforce_admins: false) adherence → admin override possibleDetail: See
SKILL_detail.md §Step 5 Merge Command—gh pr mergecommand (executed after user decision, not by this skill) — read when the user authorizes merge.
| Stage | Approval |
|---|---|
| Step 1~3 check auto-activation | Automatic (editable afterward) |
| Step 4 review comment attachment | Automatic (gh pr comment within this skill's execution authority) |
| Step 5 admin override merge execution | User decision (this skill = recommendation only / no merge authority) |
fact-checker rule (narrow 1 / broad N+1 / this cc self-catch joins fact-checker count)feedback_simplification_evidence) — when creating/modifying this skill, update SKILL.md only. No new auxiliary filesfeedback_markdown_edit_discipline) — Edit first. No Writefeedback_skill_frontmatter_description_plain_text) — avoid markdown boldDetail: See
SKILL_detail.md §Sister Asset Utilization Path,§External User Environment Adaptation Path,§Disable Path,§Persona Synergy Catch— cross-ecosystem utilization, external-environment fallback, own-PRS disable resolution, and deep-insight simultaneous-activation handling — read when operating in an external user environment, resolving own-PRS conflict, or coordinating with deep-insight.
All 5 Steps completed
+ Baseline consistency check 8-matrix results output (✅/⚠️/❌ each item)
+ Review comment attached via gh pr comment command
+ Admin override merge recommendation output (merge execution is user's decision)
+ External verification path: harvest-loop Step 3.75 Critic isolation Agent can independently judge based on above criteria (skill_quality_rubric.md verifiable criteria)
→ Mandatory when PR contains SKILL.md / rules / templates changes: bash templates/regression_guard.sh — run Axis 1 (backward check) before merge recommendation is issued. If regression_guard exits with M-tier block, merge recommendation must change to ❌ regardless of other checks.
Read the verdict from the typed channel, not the exit code — exit 0 means pass or skip
(not-checked). Run with REGRESSION_GUARD_RESULT_FILE=/tmp/rg.$$ and read result= from that file:
skip means Axis 1 did not examine this PR (no matching file) — record it as "Axis 1 N/A", never
as a green check. A merge recommendation that cites an unexamined Axis 1 as PASS is the 2026-07-22
fail-open class.
memory feedback_command_tower_gate.md (hub gate accumulated naming baseline) + memory feedback_field_to_hub_sync_protocol.md (Option C Hybrid sync policy)feedback_simplification_evidence · feedback_markdown_edit_discipline · feedback_skill_frontmatter_description_plain_text · feedback_bidirectional_self_validation · feedback_reference_own_hub_assets_firstcross-ecosystem-synergy-detection (sister asset cluster baseline) · verify-bidirectional (bidirectional self-validation automation / self-catch auxiliary axis) · harvest-loop (weekly audit automation / operation proof accumulation cross-link)memory feedback_autonomous_commit_proposal.md (① development source automation + PR proposal under human approval)