菜单
Verification discipline for completion claims. Use when about to assert success, claim a fix is complete, report tests passing, or before commits and PRs. Enforces evidence-first workflow.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | verification-before-completion |
| description | Verification discipline for completion claims. Use when about to assert success, claim a fix is complete, report tests passing, or before commits and PRs. Enforces evidence-first workflow. |
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
Evidence before claims, always. If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
BEFORE any completion claim:
1. IDENTIFY: What verification command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- NO → State actual status with evidence
- YES → State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
When multiple verification options exist (mono-repo, multiple suites):
✅ Ran: npm test
Exit: 0
Result: 47 passed, 0 failed
"All tests pass."
❌ "Tests should pass now" (no command output)
| Claim | Required Evidence | Insufficient |
|---|---|---|
| Tests pass | Test output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build exit code: 0 | Linter passing |
| Bug fixed | Original symptom test passes | Code changed |
| Regression test | Red-green cycle verified | Single green |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent "success" report |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
| Excuse | Response |
|---|---|
| "Should work now" | Run the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ build |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "Partial check enough" | Partial proves nothing |
Tests:
✅ [Run test] → [See: 34/34 pass] → "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now"
Regression (TDD):
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "Wrote regression test" (no red-green)
Requirements:
✅ Re-read plan → Checklist each item → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
Agent delegation:
✅ Agent reports → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report
Dispatches one subagent per independent domain to parallelize investigation/fixes. Use when you have 2+ unrelated failures (e.g., separate failing test files, subsystems, bugs) with no shared state or ordering dependencies.
Disciplined plan execution for implementation tasks. Use when executing a saved implementation plan, following step-by-step instructions from a plan document.
Git branch completion workflow. Use when implementation is complete, tests pass, and a feature branch needs to be integrated via merge, pull request, or cleanup.
Assesses and responds to incoming code review feedback on PRs (reviewer comments, requested changes), especially when suggestions are unclear, technically questionable, or scope-expanding. Use before implementing review suggestions to align on intent and keep changes minimal.
Use when you need to request a code review for a PR/MR and want a consistent review brief (context, scope, risk areas, test instructions, acceptance criteria) before merge.
Sequential subagent execution with two-stage review gates for implementation plans. Use when executing multi-task plans in current session, when tasks need fresh subagent context to avoid pollution, when formal review cycles (spec compliance then code quality) are required between tasks, or when you need diff-based validation of each task before proceeding.