菜单
Use when providing responsible, non-executing education about prediction-market uncertainty, resolution rules, liquidity, source quality, and reasons to take no action.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Uppercase provided text locally for demo purposes.
Draft local content for user review without publishing or external account actions.
Produce a compact local summary draft from provided text.
Placeholder for a future read-only KnowledgeVault search adapter; no external search is enabled by default.
Produce a Prismtek/Buddy talking-host overlay for narrated videos using pixel-art visemes and FFmpeg audio RMS animation.
Use when monitoring public stock-market, crypto-market, macro, sports betting, and prediction-market discourse from X, YouTube, public data, and approved sources to create educational risk briefs, watchlists, content drafts, and manual-review decision packets without executing trades or bets.
| name | prediction-market-risk-education |
| description | Use when providing responsible, non-executing education about prediction-market uncertainty, resolution rules, liquidity, source quality, and reasons to take no action. |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | Prismtek / Buddy-Hermes Skill Bridge |
| license | MIT |
| platforms | ["linux","macos","windows"] |
| metadata | {"hermes":{"tags":["prediction-markets","risk-education","resolution-rules","no-execution"],"related_skills":["sportsbook-risk-education","sports-model-risk-evaluator"]},"buddy":{"risk_class":"money","auto_executable":false,"requires_explicit_approval":true}} |
This skill helps Hermes and Buddy discuss prediction-market style questions in a non-executing way. It focuses on uncertainty, resolution-rule reading, source quality, liquidity awareness, and no-action reasoning.
It must not route orders, sign wallets, custody assets, transfer funds, use exchange credentials, or present financial activity as automated.
Use this skill when the user wants help reading market wording, comparing evidence quality, identifying ambiguous settlement criteria, or understanding why taking no action may be safer.
