菜单
Expose the reasoning structure in a result from the same combo or the current proposal or decision without inventing missing logic. Use only when the user invokes with-reasoning-map or asks for an argument or reasoning map; never expose one silently.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Supply the shared Think It Through deck rules and mental model whenever the user invokes deck, plays or combines any Think It Through card, invokes help, or asks to use the deck. Stay silent while a card or help utility produces the response; when invoked alone, initialize the deck on the available conversation.
Explore and deepen the thought currently being expressed as an active, neutral thinking partner without forcing a conclusion or changing effects. Use only when the user invokes discuss or asks to reason through something together; never redirect silently.
Separate and clarify one or more fragmented, implicit, or hard-to-word thoughts, expose only supported relationships, then respond or pass the result forward. Use only when the user invokes distill or asks for clarification before answering; never activate it silently.
Explain the current HACP Working Object at the user's requested or apparent level with the minimum detail needed for understanding while preserving its claims and caveats. Use when the user invokes explain, asks for an explanation, or passes a result from another deck into EXPLAIN; never add an explanation silently.
Push the current thought or HACP Working Object one grounded creative leap beyond its present edge without broad brainstorming, choosing a direction, or inventing support. Use only when the user invokes further or explicitly asks to push the current idea further.
Stress-test a proposal, assumption, decision, design, or plan through a relentless multi-turn grill that follows its decision tree one question and recommendation at a time. Use only when the user invokes grill or asks for a demanding challenge; never begin silently.
| name | with-reasoning-map |
| description | Expose the reasoning structure in a result from the same combo or the current proposal or decision without inventing missing logic. Use only when the user invokes with-reasoning-map or asks for an argument or reasoning map; never expose one silently. |
Use when: The user needs to inspect how a claim, proposal, decision, or system holds together. Default binding: The final reasoning from the same combo, otherwise the current proposal or decision. Accepts: A compatible HACP Working Object or the declared default material. Effect: Extract stated claims, evidence, premises, assumptions, inferences, implications, and objections, then map supported links. Result: An argument map for a claim or a broader reasoning map for a decision or system. Duration: One final representation. It does not affect later responses. Limits: Mark inferred links and uncertainty. Do not add or repair evidence, causality, confidence, or reasoning. Do not challenge or decide.
flowchart LR
A["Final or latest useful reasoning"] --> B["Extract reasoning elements"]
B --> C{"Reasoning identifiable?"}
C -->|No| D["Ask one focused question"]
C -->|Yes| E["Link supported elements"]
E --> F["Mark inference and uncertainty"]
F --> G["Preserve objections and gaps"]
G --> H["Render reasoning map"]
Append + 🧠 **REASONING MAP** to the complete combo trace. Used alone, begin with > 🎯 **<binding>** + 🧠 **REASONING MAP**.
Use labels that distinguish claims, evidence, assumptions, inferences, and objections.