用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike --skill t1027-010-command-obfuscation命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
macOS post-exploitation for credential harvesting, DTrace monitoring, TCC bypass, and stealth operations via native tools
Windows userland post-exploitation for credential harvesting, monitoring, AMSI/ETW bypass, and stealth operations
Kubernetes post-exploitation for container escape, secret extraction, RBAC abuse, and cluster persistence
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | T1027.010_command-obfuscation |
| description | Adversaries may obfuscate content during command execution to impede detection. |
| category | configuration |
| version | 18.1 |
| author | cyberstrike-official |
| tags | ["mitre-attack","enterprise","t1027.010","defense-evasion","linux","macos","windows","sub-technique"] |
| technique_id | T1027.010 |
| tactic | defense-evasion |
| all_tactics | ["defense-evasion"] |
| platforms | ["Linux","macOS","Windows"] |
| mitre_url | https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1027/010 |
| tech_stack | ["linux","macos","windows"] |
| cwe_ids | ["CWE-693"] |
| chains_with | ["T1027","T1027.001","T1027.002","T1027.003","T1027.004","T1027.005","T1027.006","T1027.007","T1027.008","T1027.009","T1027.011","T1027.012","T1027.013","T1027.014","T1027.015","T1027.016","T1027.017"] |
| prerequisites | ["T1027"] |
| severity_boost | {"T1027":"Chain with T1027 for deeper attack path","T1027.001":"Chain with T1027.001 for deeper attack path","T1027.002":"Chain with T1027.002 for deeper attack path"} |
Sub-technique of: T1027
Adversaries may obfuscate content during command execution to impede detection. Command-line obfuscation is a method of making strings and patterns within commands and scripts more difficult to signature and analyze. This type of obfuscation can be included within commands executed by delivered payloads (e.g., Phishing and Drive-by Compromise) or interactively via Command and Scripting Interpreter.
For example, adversaries may abuse syntax that utilizes various symbols and escape characters (such as spacing, ^, +. $, and %) to make commands difficult to analyze while maintaining the same intended functionality. Many languages support built-in obfuscation in the form of base64 or URL encoding. Adversaries may also manually implement command obfuscation via string splitting (“Wor”+“d.Application”), order and casing of characters (rev <<<'dwssap/cte/ tac'), globing (mkdir -p '/tmp/:&$NiA'), as well as various tricks involving passing strings through tokens/environment variables/input streams.
Adversaries may also use tricks such as directory traversals to obfuscate references to the binary being invoked by a command (C:\voi\pcw\..\..\Windows\tei\qs\k\..\..\..\system32\erool\..\wbem\wg\je\..\..\wmic.exe shadowcopy delete).
Tools such as Invoke-Obfuscation and Invoke-DOSfucation have also been used to obfuscate commands.
Platforms: Linux, macOS, Windows
Identify Attack Surface: Determine if the target environment is susceptible to Command Obfuscation by examining the target platforms (Linux, macOS, Windows).
Assess Existing Defenses: Review whether mitigations for T1027.010 are in place. If defenses are absent or misconfigured, this technique may be exploitable.
Execute Test: Use tools and methods described in the MITRE ATT&CK page and external references below.
Note: No Atomic Red Team tests available for this technique. See Atomic Red Team GitHub for updates.
On Windows 10+, enable Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules to block execution of potentially obfuscated scripts.
Consider utilizing the Antimalware Scan Interface (AMSI) on Windows 10+ to analyze commands after being processed/interpreted.
| Finding | Severity | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Command Obfuscation technique applicable | High | Defense Evasion |
| CWE ID | Title |
|---|---|
| CWE-693 | Protection Mechanism Failure |
