菜单
The reviewer agent's structured process for identifying factory improvement opportunities and generating evidence-backed intents.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Complete reference for the factory CLI — all commands, arguments, options, and usage. Use when an agent needs to invoke factory commands, check correct syntax, or understand available options.
When and how to write a human-action-needed entry to memory/{agent}/needs.md. Agents write these entries when they hit blockers that only a human can resolve.
When you encounter a failure, correction, or new pattern, write a learning and optionally propose a skill.
How the factory workspace is organized and what each directory means.
What to examine during a reflection pass and how to write observations to memory/{agent}/needs.md.
When and how to write scenario holdouts for factory verification.
| name | review-protocol |
| description | The reviewer agent's structured process for identifying factory improvement opportunities and generating evidence-backed intents. |
Generate well-formed intent files for the human to curate. Your job is observation and identification — not execution. The human decides what gets built.
Before identifying anything, read:
specs/inbox/ — pending intents awaiting specspecs/drafting/ — intents being speccedspecs/ready/ — specced and awaiting builderspecs/archive/ — completed specs (reference)Note what topics are already addressed. Do not generate competing or duplicate intents. If an existing intent partially addresses a concern, note it in your daily log but do not generate a competing intent.
Read memory/*/needs.md across all agent directories.
For any entry where status: open and the created timestamp is more than 2× your heartbeat interval in the past, note it in your review output as an escalated item. Format:
Escalated need: {id} [{agent}, created {timestamp}]
{blocked field}
This is informational — you cannot resolve needs entries. The human runs factory needs to see the full list and factory needs --resolve {id} after acting.
Do not generate a competing intent if the blocker is already captured in a needs entry.
Work through these categories. Stop at 3 high-quality intents — do not exhaust all categories if you've already found 3 worth generating.
Read learnings/failures/. Look for:
{date}-{project}-{summary}.md)Intent candidate: recurring theme with 2+ entries, no existing fix in skills/ or specs.
Read universe/values.md. For each value:
Intent candidate: value that has no structural support and no existing spec addressing it.
Read universe/synthesis/factory-blueprint.md. Check:
Intent candidate: described capability with no evidence of implementation or planned work.
Scan skills/{agent}/ directories. For each agent in agents.yaml with available skills listed:
skills/{agent}/{skill-name}/SKILL.md exist with content?.gitkeep (i.e., listed but unbuilt)?Also check: which agents have daily logs (memory/daily/{agent}/) but have only the shared skill set?
Intent candidate: skill listed in agents.yaml but with no SKILL.md content. Cite the specific agent and skill name.
Read specs/archive/ and tasks/verified/. Look for:
Intent candidate: explicit follow-up mention in verified work with no existing spec.
Read memory/shared/KNOWLEDGE.md and memory/shared/PROJECTS.md. Look for:
Intent candidate: concrete inconsistency or stale entry.
Rank by impact:
Generate the top 3. Log the rest in your daily log for next run.
For each intent to generate:
{topic}-{aspect}.md (e.g., missing-verifier-skills.md, value-transparency-gap.md)specs/inbox/{slug}.md:<!-- generated by: reviewer | run: {YYYY-MM-DD}T{HH:MM} | evidence: {brief citation} -->
# {working-title}
## What I'm Seeing
[Concrete observations with file/directory references — be specific]
## What I Want to See
[Desired end state — describe the outcome, not the implementation]
Write to memory/daily/reviewer/{YYYY-MM-DD}.md:
## {HH:MM} — Review Run
**Categories reviewed**: [list all reviewed]
**Candidates identified**: [count]
**Intents generated**: [list slugs]
**Deferred**: [list topics not generated, with reason]
**Skipped (duplicate)**: [list topics already addressed]
If NO_REPLY: note what was reviewed and why nothing was generated.
Every "What I'm Seeing" section must reference:
skills/verifier/scenario-evaluation/ contains only .gitkeep)Generic observations ("the factory lacks X") without file/directory evidence are not acceptable.