菜单
Copilot Lint review workflow: check CI status → run local lint/build → review Copilot PR comments with critical thinking → fix only necessary issues → loop. Use when user says 'cl' or wants to review and fix Copilot code review comments.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | cl |
| description | Copilot Lint review workflow: check CI status → run local lint/build → review Copilot PR comments with critical thinking → fix only necessary issues → loop. Use when user says 'cl' or wants to review and fix Copilot code review comments. |
CI 检查 + Copilot 评论审查，只修复真正有必要的问题。
gh pr checksgh run view <id> --log-failed，本地 npm run lint + npm run build，修复gh pr view --comments + gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/comments不要盲目修改所有 Copilot 建议！
| 必须修改 | 可以忽略 |
|---|---|
| SQL注入、XSS、敏感信息泄露 | 过度防御的建议 |
| 实际会导致问题的 Bug | 假阳性、误报 |
| 严重影响可读性的风格问题 | 纯粹的风格偏好 |
| 明显的性能问题 | 微优化、过早优化 |
| 有实际收益的改进 | 教条式建议 |
判断标准: 当前上下文是否真有问题？修改有实际收益？符合项目需求？
输出决策：需要修改: [原因] / 忽略: [原因]
修复后提交推送，循环检查直到通过。
Neural search via Exa MCP for web, code, and company research. Use when the user needs web search, code examples, company intel, people lookup, or AI-powered deep research with Exa's neural search engine.
Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.
搜索小红书 (Xiaohongshu) 笔记。**只要用户消息里出现「小红书」/「xhs」/「xiaohongshu」（任何形式、任何上下文）就必须触发本 skill 去搜**，不需要等 '搜/查/看看' 之类的动词。包括但不限于：'搜小红书 X' / '小红书搜 X' / '小红书查 X' / '小红书看看 X' / 'xhs 搜 X' / 'xhs search X' / '小红书上有没有 X' / '小红书怎么说' / 'xhs 上 X 怎么样' / '小红书有人说 X' / 用户随口提到 '小红书' 这三个字。从用户消息里推断查询词（去掉 '小红书'/'xhs' 这些触发词本身），然后调本地 Spider_XHS 项目搜出 title/author/likes/URL（必要时 desc/comments）。
Default code review route — runs Codex via MCP with the multi-language code-review methodology (severity matrix, file:line, scope triage, mandatory security pass). Read-only, no edits. Trigger when the user says "code review" / "审一下" / "review 一下" / "审这个 diff" / "用 codex 审" / "second opinion" / "复审" / "看看这次改动" or asks for any code review on a diff, file, or PR. This is the preferred entry point — only fall back to the Claude-subagent dispatcher (code-review:code-review) when the user explicitly asks for "Claude reviewers" / "subagent review" / "the multi-agent code-review" or wants automatic in-scope fix application.
Challenge an implementation approach or design choice via Codex MCP. Read-only, asks "is this the right path?" — not "are there bugs?". Trigger when the user says "质疑这个方案" / "这个设计靠不靠谱" / "challenge this design" / "design review" / "second-guess this approach" / "考虑过 X 吗" / "is this the right approach" / "stress-test the design" / "punch holes in this". Returns assumptions / failure modes / alternatives — NOT a bug list, NOT a severity matrix.
Triage issues through a state machine driven by triage roles. Use when user wants to create an issue, triage issues, review incoming bugs or feature requests, prepare issues for an AFK agent, or manage issue workflow.