一键在 Manus 中运行任何 Skill

astrofairy

星标3

分支0

更新时间2026年7月1日 08:41

Investigate how to access and use public astronomical survey/archive data for a specified observer task. The skill supports both Survey Mode (given a survey/release, explain how to use it) and Position Mode (given a coordinate/object, summarize useful survey/archive coverage and observation availability across major data services). Use when user asks about survey coverage, archive data access, telescope data products, image cutout/download, PSF/mask/variance, proposal/program checking, multi-wavelength data inventory, or observation availability at a sky coordinate.

安装

用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。

在 Manus 中运行

来源

DenekoW

DenekoW/AstroFairy

打开 GitHub 仓库查看创作者相关仓库

下载

在 Manus 中运行

AstroFairy

Observer-oriented research protocol for public astronomical survey/archive data access. The agent should investigate current official documentation rather than rely on a static survey database.

Version: 0.3

Modes

Survey Mode

Purpose: Given a survey or release, investigate its public data products, access routes, programmatic interfaces, caveats, and recommended observer workflow.

Input: survey, release, desired_products, science_case

Output: Survey Access Report

Position Mode

Purpose: Given a coordinate or object name, summarize useful survey/archive coverage and observation availability across major data services, filtered by the user's science case. This mode should avoid returning an unfiltered list of all catalog hits.

Input required: coordinate_or_object_name

Input optional: radius, science_case, priority_surveys, wavelength_range, required_products, output_format

Output: Coordinate Data Inventory Report

Sub-mode — Proposal Check: Given a coordinate/object name + aliases, check whether relevant approved observing programs, scheduled/planned observations, executed observations, proprietary data, or public archive products exist. Triggered when user mentions proposal, program ID, "有没有 proposal", "被 JWST/HST/ALMA 覆盖" etc. See ## Proposal Check Protocol below.

Trigger Conditions

Load this skill when user asks:

"Does a survey/release cover my target or field?"
"How do I query a survey catalog?"
"How do I download images or cutouts?"
"Can I get PSF, mask, variance, weight maps, or sky products?"
"Which release/data product should I use?"
"Is this survey suitable for my science case?"
"What is the best programmatic access route?"
"Compare surveys for a specific observer task."
"Given this coordinate, what survey/archive data are available?"
"What observations exist at this sky position?"
"Which surveys cover this coordinate?"
"Summarize useful data around this RA/Dec."
"Check MAST/IRSA/CDS/NED/major surveys for this position."
"Filter coordinate-search results by usefulness for my science case."
"Is there an approved JWST/HST/ALMA proposal covering this target?"
"有没有 proposal / 有没有被 JWST 观测 / 有没有已批准项目"
"Check if this target has proprietary or planned observations."
"What JWST programs target this object or field?"
"Check Subaru/HSC proposals for this target."
"有没有 HSC/Subaru proposal / 有没有被 Subaru 观测"
"Check Keck proposals for this target."
"有没有 Keck proposal / KOA archive for this target"

Input Parsing

Required or Inferred

survey
release
task_type
desired_products
science_case

Optional

target_ra_dec
radius
object_name
field_name
object_list
filters
depth_requirement
resolution_requirement
output_format

Task Types

coverage
catalog_query
image_cutout
psf_mask_variance_access
release_status
science_case_suitability
programmatic_access
cross_survey_comparison
batch_download
position_data_inventory
proposal_check

Position Mode Input Parsing

Default search radii:

Point source: 10 arcsec
Galaxy or extended source: 30–120 arcsec (depending on apparent size)
Cluster or large structure: 5–30 arcmin (depending on science case)

Default services to check:

CDS SIMBAD — object identity, aliases, object type, redshift, bibliography
CDS VizieR — published catalog tables near the coordinate
CDS Aladin/HiPS — visual inspection of multi-survey sky images
NED — extragalactic identity, redshift, photometry, cross-IDs
MAST — UV/optical/NIR space-based obs (HST, JWST, GALEX, TESS, Kepler/K2)
IRSA — IR all-sky products (WISE, unWISE, 2MASS, Spitzer) + SPHEREx QR2
SPHEREx QR2 — all-sky NIR spectroscopy (0.75–5.0 μm, R~40–130); check via IRSA/SIA v2
ESA ESASky — cross-mission discovery and footprint inspection
Chandra Archive — high-resolution X-ray
XMM-Newton Archive — X-ray observations and source products
ALMA Archive (if relevant) — mm/sub-mm
Major optical imaging surveys (HSC-SSP, DESI-LS, SDSS, Pan-STARRS, DES, Euclid/LSST if public)

Service purpose summary:

Service	Purpose
CDS SIMBAD	Object identity, aliases, object type, redshift, bibliography, basic measurements
CDS VizieR	Published catalog tables and value-added catalogs near the coordinate
CDS Aladin/HiPS	Visual inspection of multi-survey sky images and overlays
NED	Extragalactic object identity, redshift, photometry, literature cross-IDs
MAST	UV/optical/NIR space-based obs and HLSPs (HST, JWST, GALEX, TESS, Kepler/K2)
IRSA	IR all-sky products (WISE, unWISE, 2MASS, Spitzer, Herschel-related) + SPHEREx QR2
SPHEREx QR2	All-sky NIR spectroscopy 0.75–5.0 μm, R~40–130; 6.2" pixels; DOIs: QR2=10.26131/IRSA652
ESA ESASky	Cross-mission observation discovery and footprint inspection
Chandra Archive	High-resolution X-ray observations
XMM-Newton Archive	X-ray observations and source products
ALMA Archive	mm/sub-mm (when relevant to science case)

Coverage verification levels:

Use this three-tier system in the multi-wavelength summary table:

Symbol	Meaning	When to use
✅	Covered	(a) s_region polygon verified for individual exposures, OR (b) published survey footprint map confirms this coordinate falls within the imaged area
❌	Confirmed gap	s_region verified that individual exposures miss; or documented detector/chip gap at this exact position
⚠️	Catalog-level only	A catalog entry exists near this coordinate, but no corresponding image product is available (e.g.value-added catalogs without imaging)

Rules:

Do NOT downgrade survey-level coverage to "⚠️" just because individual exposures were not footprint-verified. If a survey's published footprint map covers the COSMOS field and this coordinate is in the COSMOS field, it's ✅.
Do NOT use "likely" without citing a source. If uncertain, state what is known and what is not.
For dedicated deep fields (COSMOS, GOODS, EGS, etc.): assume continuous survey products (Spitzer, Herschel, HSC, Chandra, XMM, VLA) cover the entire field unless documented gaps exist.
For HST/JWST: individual exposures must be s_region verified because detector gaps and mosaic seams are real.
For wide-area ground surveys (DESI-LS, SDSS, PS1): check the survey's public footprint map; if the coordinate is inside, mark ✅.
Always cite the survey paper that defines the footprint and depth.
Depth source: always cite a specific paper reference (author+year+journal).

Ranking rules:

High priority:

Survey-level imaging products
Archive observation products
Spectra of the target
UV/optical/IR/X-ray/radio data relevant to science case
Products with image cutout or download access
Products with PSF/mask/variance when image modeling is needed
Object-targeted observations from space-based archives
Major all-sky or wide-area surveys relevant to science case

Medium priority:

Major value-added catalogs
Photoz or specz catalogs
Object cross-identification databases
Literature tables directly targeting the object or field
Environmental or group/cluster catalogs when relevant

Low priority by default:

Generic foreground star catalogs
Proper motion catalogs (unless needed)
Astrometric catalogs (unless needed)
Unrelated small catalogs from nearby fields
Duplicate crossmatch tables
Catalogs for a different object class than the science case

Science-case sorting:

Galaxy SED / photometry:

Prioritize: UV from GALEX/MAST, optical imaging and catalogs, NIR/MIR from IRSA, reliable spectroscopic redshift, broad-band photometry catalogs
Deprioritize: unrelated field catalogs, proper motion catalogs

Spectroscopy / redshift:

Prioritize: spectra of target, spectroscopic redshift catalogs, SDSS/DESI/GAMA/6dF, NED and SIMBAD redshift records
Deprioritize: imaging-only products (unless needed for context)

Time domain:

Prioritize: TESS, Kepler, K2, ZTF/other time-domain surveys, epoch-level or lightcurve products
Deprioritize: static catalogs without epoch information

X-ray / AGN:

Prioritize: Chandra, XMM-Newton, eROSITA (if public), radio surveys, WISE mid-IR, optical spectroscopy
Deprioritize: unrelated optical-only catalog hits

Position mode caveats:

Footprint coverage does not guarantee useful depth
Catalog detection does not guarantee image-level data availability
Archive observations near the coordinate may miss the target (detector gaps, edges, chip layout, roll angle)
Extended galaxies require a larger search radius than point sources
image-level products with PSF, masks, variance/weight maps, sky/background
Do NOT return an unfiltered CDS/VizieR-style catalog dump; rank and summarize by observer usefulness
If results are too numerous, collapse low-priority catalogs into a deprioritized section
CRITICAL: A coordinate usually corresponds to a specific astronomical object. Verify that data products actually cover the EXACT coordinate, not just fall within the search cone. 'Present in search radius' ≠ 'covers this target'. Check s_region/footprint for each observation.

Deep field recognition (critical for Position Mode):

If SIMBAD returns >200 objects within 2 arcmin, check catalog names against references/famous-deep-fields.md
COSMOS field: catalog names like COSMOS2020, COSMOS2015, COSMOS 06XXXXX, zCOSMOS, UVISTA
HUDF: HUDF, UDF, XDF catalog names
GOODS: GOODS-N, GOODS-S, HDF-N catalog names
If a famous field is identified: skip generic IRSA/WISE/Chandra cone searches (they will overflow or return redundant data). Instead, go directly to field-specific master catalogs (COSMOS2020 VizieR, 3D-HST, C-COSMOS source catalog, etc.) and skip redundant multi-service queries.
If NOT a famous field: proceed with the standard multi-service Position Mode search.

Proposal Check Protocol

Purpose: Given a coordinate, object name, alias list, or target list, check whether relevant approved observing programs, scheduled/planned observations, executed observations, proprietary data, or public archive products exist. This is a program-level extension of Position Mode.

Scope by confidence:

High confidence: JWST, HST (MAST missions with structured observation metadata), Subaru/HSC (NAOJ per-semester accepted proposals list, publicly available)
Medium confidence: ALMA, Chandra, XMM-Newton, ESO/NOIRLab archives, Keck (public schedule + KOA archive; no structured per-semester accepted proposals page like Subaru)
Low confidence / manual: facilities without structured public program search

Default facilities to check: JWST, HST, Subaru/HSC, MAST, ALMA (if mm/sub-mm relevance), Keck (if optical/NIR relevance), Chandra (if X-ray relevance), XMM-Newton (if X-ray relevance)

JWST Proposal Check

JWST is the highest-priority target for proposal checking. Official sources:

Source	URL	Role
STScI Approved Programs	`https://www.stsci.edu/jwst/science-execution/approved-programs`	Official list of approved JWST programs by cycle/type
STScI Program Information	`https://www.stsci.edu/jwst/science-execution/program-information`	Official program lookup by ID
MAST JWST Archive	`https://archive.stsci.edu/missions-and-data/jwst`	Observation metadata and data products
ESA JWST Science Archive	ESA archive	Alternative route for European programs

Third-party helper: https://jwst-search.zhechenghu.com/

Property	Detail
Role	Fast discovery tool for public approved JWST proposal text, target names, abstracts, descriptions, and observation tables
Use for	Target name search, alias search, proposal keyword search, object list cross-match, candidate program discovery
Limitations	Not authoritative for execution status; not authoritative for data public status; not sufficient for exact detector footprint containment; extracted from public proposal documents — parsing errors possible
Availability	Requires a browser (client-side React SPA). In Docker containers or headless environments where no browser is installed, skip this tool and use fallbacks: (1) STScI Approved Programs page grep, (2) arXiv literature search, (3) MAST Name.Lookup + Observations query. See `references/jwst-proposal-check.md` for detailed fallback workflows.
Verification rule	Treat matches as candidate proposal coverage. Verify program status, observation execution, public/proprietary state, data products, and exact spatial coverage using MAST, STScI program information, or ESA JWST Archive.
Fallback: arXiv literature	When the JWST search tool is unavailable (no browser), search arXiv for `"TOI-XXX" + "JWST"` or `"target_name" + "JWST"` to find papers discussing JWST observations. This confirms observation existence but does NOT provide program IDs.
Verification rule	Treat matches as candidate proposal coverage. Verify program status, observation execution, public/proprietary state, data products, and exact spatial coverage using MAST, STScI program information, or ESA JWST Archive.

MAST Name Lookup API (for resolving object names):

curl -X POST 'https://mast.stsci.edu/api/v0/invoke' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
  -d 'request={"service":"Mast.Name.Lookup","params":{"input":"TOI-270","format":"json"}}'

Returns: resolvedCoordinate array with canonicalName, ra, decl, objectType, resolver (SIMBAD, TIC, NED, etc.). Supports target names, TIC IDs, and common aliases.

JWST output fields: program_id, cycle, proposal_title, PI, target_name, target_coordinates, instrument, mode, filters/gratings, observation_status, public/proprietary, data_products, access_route, confidence, verification_needed

HST / MAST Proposal Check

Check observation/program metadata and downloadable products through MAST. Prefer observation metadata over proposal-text search.

Query routes (preferred):

astroquery.mast.Observations.query_region
astroquery.mast.Observations.query_criteria
MAST Portal
MAST API

Search keys: coordinate, object_name, proposal_id (if known), mission, instrument

HST/MAST output fields: mission, program_id, target_name, instrument, filters/gratings, exposure_time, observation_date, public/proprietary, product_type, access_route, confidence

ALMA Proposal Check

Activate when: science case mentions mm/sub-mm, molecular gas/dust, or user explicitly mentions ALMA.

Query route: ALMA Science Archive, ALMA archive query interface

ALMA output fields: project_code, target_name, band/frequency, array_configuration, observation_status, public/proprietary, product_type, access_route, confidence

Subaru / HSC Proposal Check

Subaru publishes accepted proposals per semester as a structured, publicly accessible list for every semester from S00 to present (S26B as of 2026).

Official sources:

Source	URL	Role
NAOJ Past Semester Info	`https://www.naoj.org/Observing/Proposals/pastinfo.html`	Index of all semester proposal lists (S00–S26B)
Per-semester page	`https://www.naoj.org/Observing/Proposals/Pastinfo/s{XX}{a\|b}.html`	Accepted proposals for a given semester: ID, PI, Proposal Title, Instrument, Nights, Abstract
Subaru Schedule	`https://www.naoj.org/cgi-bin/opecenter/schedule.cgi/`	Nightly telescope schedule with program IDs, PIs, instruments
SMOKA Archive	`https://smoka.nao.ac.jp/`	Data archive — HSC Search for raw data, Advanced Search for reductions
SMOKA HSC Search	`https://smoka.nao.ac.jp/HSCsearch.jsp`	HSC-specific raw data search

Proposal page structure: Each semester page (e.g., S26B) contains:

Summary statistics: total proposals submitted, nights requested, nights allocated
Table: ID (e.g., S26A-147), PI, Proposal Title, Instrument, Nights, Abstract
Intensive Programs (multi-semester) listed separately
HSC Queue mode allocations noted

Search strategy (headless/Docker environments):

Page text search: The NAOJ pages use MkDocs Material (JS-rendered). In headless environments (no browser), curl can only extract the summary statistics and page structure, NOT the proposal table data. The table is loaded dynamically via JS.
Fallback: schedule page: The nightly schedule at schedule.cgi/ is plain HTML and fully parseable with curl. You can grep for program IDs (e.g., S26A-, S26B-) and PI names to find executed programs.
Fallback: arXiv literature: Search arXiv for "target_name" + "HSC" or "target_name" + "Subaru" to find papers using HSC/Subaru data — confirms observation existence.
Verification rule: Browser access is recommended for full proposal table search. In headless mode, use schedule page + arXiv literature as fallback.

Subaru output fields: program_id (e.g., S26A-147), semester, proposal_title, PI, instrument (HSC, MOIRCS, IRCS, HDS, etc.), nights_allocated, queue_or_classical, observation_status (from schedule page), data_available (via SMOKA), access_route, confidence, verification_needed

Subaru program ID format:

S{YY}{A|B}-NNN — Normal Program (e.g., S26A-147)
S{YY}{A|B}-OTNNN — ToO Program
S{YY}{A|B}-UHNNN — University of Hawaii
S{YY}{A|B}-TENNN — Engineering
S{YY}{A|B}-INNN — Intensive Program

Keck Proposal Check

Keck Observatory publishes nightly telescope schedules showing executed programs, but does NOT maintain a structured per-semester "accepted proposals" list comparable to Subaru's. Proposal metadata exists in the schedule feed and the KOA archive.

Official sources:

Source	URL	Role
Keck Schedule	`http://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/schedule/`	Nightly schedule: PI, institution, instrument, project codes (HTTP only)
Keck Schedule RSS	`http://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/schedule/ws/schedule.rss`	RSS feed of nightly schedule (HTTP only)
KOA Archive	`https://koa.ipac.caltech.edu/`	Keck Observatory Archive — data search and download
Keck Observer Info	`https://keckobservatory.org/science/observing/`	General observing information (not a proposal list)

Search strategy:

Schedule feed: The RSS feed and schedule page show nightly executed programs with PI names, institutions, instruments (MOSFIRE, DEIMOS, LRIS, NIRSPEC, KCWI, etc.), and project codes (e.g., U075M for UCLA, C123 for Caltech).
KOA Archive: Search by target coordinates, object name, or program/investigator. Provides access to public data products.
No structured proposal list: Unlike Subaru, Keck does not publish a per-semester accepted proposals page with titles and abstracts. The TAC results are not systematically public.
Verification: Schedule presence confirms execution but not proposal acceptance. KOA confirms data availability.

Keck output fields: program_code, semester, PI (from schedule), institution, instrument, observation_date (from schedule), data_available (via KOA), access_route, confidence

⚠️ Keck schedule caveats:

Schedule pages use HTTP only (not HTTPS) — may be blocked in some environments
No structured proposal title or abstract search available
Project codes (e.g., C123, U075M) are institution-specific, not globally unique
KOA is the recommended primary access point for data products

Ranking Rules

High priority:

Exact target name or alias match in approved program
Coordinate match with confirmed footprint containment
Executed observation with public data
Executed observation with proprietary metadata
Planned/approved observation relevant to science case
Target in official program or archive metadata

Medium priority:

Proposal text keyword match without coordinate confirmation
Observation near coordinate but footprint not verified
Program mentions related field/cluster but not exact target
Archive project metadata without public products

Low priority:

Generic keyword match in unrelated proposal
Nearby observation not covering target
Target name ambiguous without coordinate confirmation
Catalog hit without observation or program metadata

Proposal Check Output Template

Title: "Proposal / Program Coverage Check: {coordinate_or_object_name}"

Sections:

Task Interpretation — coordinate_or_object_name, resolved_coordinates, aliases_used, search_radius, facilities_checked, science_case
Executive Summary — whether relevant programs/observations found, strongest matches, data public status, verification needed
Proposal/Program Matches — table: facility, program_id, cycle/period, title, PI, target, instrument/band, status, public/proprietary, relevance, confidence
Observation and Data Products — executed observations, available products, access routes, download/archive links
Rejected / Low-Priority Matches — ambiguous name matches, keyword-only matches, nearby-but-not-covering, unrelated field programs
Caveats — proposal match ≠ executed; nearby ≠ detector coverage; proprietary metadata may exist without public data; third-party search results must be verified officially

Proposal Check Caveats

A proposal/program match does not guarantee the observation was executed
An executed observation near the coordinate does not guarantee the target lies inside the detector footprint
Public proposal metadata does not imply public science data
Proprietary data may have visible metadata but inaccessible products
Third-party proposal search tools are useful for discovery but must be verified against official archive metadata
For extended objects, check whether the full target, not just the nucleus, is covered

Rule: If Release Unspecified

Investigate the latest public release, but explicitly warn that access methods, table names, products, and caveats are release-specific.

Source Priority

Official survey or archive documentation
Official data release paper
Official schema browser or API documentation
Official known problems or caveats page
IVOA / VO registry / PyVO / astroquery documentation
Peer-reviewed papers using the relevant product
Community tutorials or GitHub examples
Unverified third-party summaries

Investigation Protocol

Step 1: Identify Survey and Release

Check:

official_name
telescope_or_mission
instrument
release_version
public_status
latest_public_release
release_date_if_available

Step 2: Identify Available Products

Check:

catalogs (forced_photometry, summary_tables)
images (cutouts, coadds, single_epoch)
psf_models
masks (bad_pixel, bright_star)
variance_or_weight_maps
sky_background_products
spectra
photoz_or_specz
random_catalogs
footprint / MOC / HiPS
ancillary_products

Rule: Separate public products from internal/non-public products.

Step 3: Investigate Sky Coverage

Check:

official_footprint
MOC / HiPS
Aladin or viewer
field/tile/tract/patch tables
downloadable_footprint_files
batch_coverage_method

Decision tree:

If MOC exists → recommend MOC-based coverage matching
If HiPS exists → recommend Aladin/Aladin Lite for visual inspection
If only tile/tract/patch tables exist → explain local matching
If only a web viewer exists → provide manual workflow and search for API/batch alternative

Step 4: Investigate Catalog Access

Check:

TAP / ADQL
CAS / SQL
schema_browser
official_API
downloadable_catalog_files
astroquery_module
pyvo_compatibility
authentication / query_limits / row_limits / async_job_support
recommended_tables
coordinate_columns / object_id_columns / flux_or_magnitude_columns
quality_flags / primary_object_selection

Decision tree:

If TAP/ADQL exists → recommend PyVO or direct ADQL
If survey-specific astroquery module exists → recommend astroquery
If CAS/SQL exists but not VO-compatible → recommend official SQL/CAS route
If only files exist → recommend file-based access
Do NOT invent table or column names; verify with schema docs

Step 5: Investigate Image Access

Check:

cutout_web_service / cutout_API / command_line_tool
direct_file_tree
coadd_access / single_epoch_access
filters / size_limits / file_format
WCS_units_zeropoint
batch_download_support

Decision tree:

If stable API/CLI exists → provide batch-download plan
If only web cutout exists → provide manual route and scalability warning
If direct files exist → explain tile/tract/patch filename mapping

Step 6: Investigate PSF / Mask / Variance Access

Check:

PSF_model or PSF_picker
masks (bad_pixel, bright_star)
variance_maps / inverse_variance_or_weight_maps
exposure_maps
sky_or_background_models

Decision tree:

Do NOT assume PSF exists just because images exist
Do NOT assume mask/variance are included in cutouts
For image modeling → recommend science + mask + variance/weight + PSF + metadata

Step 7: Investigate Programmatic Access

Check:

PyVO / astroquery
official_python_client / official_CLI
REST_API
TAP / ADQL / SIA / SSA / cone_search
bulk_download / wget_or_curl
authentication_tokens

Decision tree:

Use PyVO for standard VO services (TAP/SIA/SSA/Cone Search)
Use astroquery for service-specific modules or non-VO web interfaces
Use official API/CLI when survey-specific access is required
Use manual web workflow only when no stable programmatic route exists

Science Case Caveats

Science-case-specific caveats are maintained in private/science-case-caveats.md (gitignored). When performing Survey Mode or Position Mode investigations, check that file for relevant caveats based on the user's science case. General-purpose investigations should note:

Image-level science (morphology, surface photometry): Do NOT recommend catalog-only workflows. Always check PSF/mask/variance availability.
Spectroscopy: Check wavelength coverage, resolution, flux calibration, and redshift quality flags.
Photometry: Check deblending, saturation, sky subtraction, and photometric calibration for extended sources.
Time domain: Check epoch availability, cadence, and lightcurve products.
Astrometry: Check proper motion accuracy, parallax systematics, and reference frame.

Output Templates

Survey Mode: "Survey Access Report: {survey} {release}"

Sections:

Task Interpretation — survey_archive, release, user_task, target/field, desired_products, science_case, assumptions_made
Executive Verdict — one of: usable / partially_usable / not_suitable / unclear. Include: can_user_do_task, recommended_route, main_caveat
Sources Checked — columns: source_type, source, what_it_supports, reliability
Data Availability — catalog, coadd_image, single_epoch_image, psf, mask, variance/weight, footprint, ancillary
Filters / Bands / Wavelength Coverage
Sky Coverage / Footprint
Catalog Access
Image / Cutout Access
PSF / Mask / Variance / Weight Access
Programmatic Access Recommendation
Science Case Caveats
Minimal Recommended Workflow
Open Questions / Manual Verification
Final Practical Recommendation

Position Mode: "Coordinate Data Inventory: {object_name}"

Sections:

Object Identity — name, type, RA/Dec, magnitudes, redshift, catalog source, sources cited (with URLs)
Multi-Wavelength Summary — single master table: survey, filters, depth (5σ AB), resolution, covers? (✅ s_region verified / ❌ s_region missed / ⚠️ catalog-level only), source citation for depth/resolution. Subsections: Optical / NIR / UV / MIR+FIR / X-ray+Radio / Spectroscopy. Include specific API/curl commands for each survey.
Footprint-Verified Space Data — MAST s_region results: confirmed coverage table (obs_id, instrument, filter, exp, program) + confirmed misses table. Include exact MAST API curl command used.
Ground-Based Catalogs — catalog-level coverage (not footprint verified). Include specific query commands (SQL, curl, astroquery) for each survey. Note "⚠️ catalog-level only" for unverified footprints.
Spectroscopy Attempts — table: survey, query used, result (hit/miss/not executed). Include specific commands.
Low Priority / Not Useful — brief table with reasons.
Manual Verification Checklist — tickbox list of pending verifications.

Rules for the summary table:

Use the three-tier system: ✅ (covered), ❌ (confirmed gap), ⚠️ (catalog-level only, no imaging)
Never use "likely" without a source citation
Always cite the source for depth and resolution claims (paper reference with author+year+journal)
Include the exact API/curl/query command for every survey listed
Merge all wavelength bands into a single master table; do not duplicate columns
For dedicated deep fields (COSMOS): continuous survey products are ✅ by published footprint
For HST/JWST: individual s_region verification is required and reported separately in section 3

Quality Checklist

Survey Mode

Did I identify the survey and release?
Did I distinguish official docs from community examples?
Did I check catalog access separately from image access?
Did I check PSF/mask/variance separately?
Did I check footprint/coverage method?
Did I identify programmatic access options?
Did I include science-case-specific caveats?
Did I avoid inventing unverified table names or commands?
Did I provide source links/citations?
Did I state uncertainty clearly?
Did I give a practical workflow?

Position Mode (additional items)

Did I resolve the object name or confirm the input coordinate?
Did I choose a search radius appropriate for point source vs extended source?
Did I check MAST by default?
Did I check IRSA/CDS/NED or explain why not?
Did I verify footprint (s_region) for each MAST observation, not just cone presence?
Did I clearly separate 'covers this exact coordinate' from 'nearby but misses'?
Did I handle all s_region formats (POLYGON, CIRCLE, CIRCLE ICRS)?
Did I separate survey-level products from generic catalog hits?
Did I rank results by science-case usefulness?
Did I avoid dumping all VizieR/CDS catalog results unfiltered?
Did I identify which archives provide actual downloadable observations?
Did I warn that footprint/nearby observation does not guarantee target coverage?
If SIMBAD returned >200 objects in 2 arcmin: did I check references/famous-deep-fields.md before running redundant multi-service queries?

Tool Environment Constraints

In some execution environments, the following tools may be unavailable. Use fallbacks:

Missing Tool	Fallback
`web_search`	`terminal` with `curl -sL --max-time 15 '<url>'`
`browser_navigate`	`terminal` with `curl` + `sed`/`grep` to extract text
`execute_code` (Python)	Use `terminal` with inline Python: `python3 -c "..."`

For HTML-heavy WordPress sites (common for survey docs), use these extraction patterns:

Extract menu links: grep -oP 'menu-item.*href="[^"]*"'
Extract paragraph content: grep -oP '(?<=<p>|<li>)[^<]+(?=</p>|</li>)'
Strip CSS/JS noise: sed 's/<style[^>]*>.*<\/style>//g; s/<script[^>]*>.*<\/script>//g'

For URL discovery on survey sites: check the homepage's menu structure first (grep menu-item) before guessing paths. Survey sites often use non-obvious path patterns (e.g., HSC uses __pdr3 suffix: /survey__pdr3/ not /survey/).

astroquery availability: Always check python3 -c "import astroquery" before recommending it. It may not be installed in the execution environment.

LaTeXML-based documentation (e.g., Gaia DR3 archive docs): Use curl | sed 's/<[^>]*>//g' then grep -v to strip JS/CSS boilerplate. LaTeXML renders content as clean text within HTML tags — this extraction works well. Distinguish from WordPress sites which require different patterns.

⚠️ Terminal && chains are blocked: The Hermes terminal tool rejects commands with && as foreground multi-step chains ("Foreground command uses '&' backgrounding"). Split multi-step workflows into separate terminal calls (git add, git commit, git pull, git push as individual invocations).

⚠️ Terminal && chains are blocked: The Hermes terminal tool rejects commands containing && as foreground multi-step chains ("Foreground command uses '&' backgrounding"). Split multi-step workflows (e.g., git add → git commit → git pull → git push) into separate terminal calls.

⚠️ Pipe-to-interpreter is blocked by security scanner: Patterns like curl ... | python3 -c "..." and curl ... | python3 -m json.tool are flagged as HIGH severity and will be blocked. When you need to process API JSON responses on the command line, use one of these alternatives:

Option A — Two-step: curl ... -o /tmp/resp.json && python3 -c "..." /tmp/resp.json
Option B — python3 urllib inline: python3 -c "import urllib.request, json; ..." (all Python, no pipe)
Option C — python3 with stdin redirect: python3 -c "..." < <(curl ...) (may still be blocked — test first)
Option D — jq: curl ... | jq '.data[] | {ra, dec}' (jq is not a full interpreter, usually passes)

Prefer Option A (temp file) for reliability. The pipe-to-interpreter block specifically targets | python3, | node, | ruby, and similar patterns where the curl output is directly fed to a code interpreter without inspection.

⚠️ Browser tool may be unavailable: In Docker environments without pre-installed Chromium, browser_navigate and browser_* tools may not work. agent-browser requires Node.js ≥ 24 and root npm permissions. Playwright Chromium downloads (~150MB) may time out on slow connections. Fallbacks for browser-dependent tasks:

For JWST proposal search: use arXiv literature reverse-search, or ask user to search https://jwst-search.zhechenghu.com/ manually
For MAST object resolution: use Mast.Name.Lookup API (works without browser)
For HTML-heavy survey sites: use curl + grep/sed extraction patterns (see above)

Non-Goals

Do NOT maintain a complete static encyclopedia of all surveys
Do NOT replace official archive documentation
Do NOT invent API syntax, table names, or product availability
Do NOT treat coverage, catalog, image, and PSF access as the same problem
Do NOT recommend catalog-only workflows for image-level science
Do NOT infer or embed user-specific science cases (e.g., "LSB / stellar halo / ICL / galaxy evolution inferred from user profile") in generated output reports. Output templates should be science-case-agnostic — describe survey capabilities generically, let the user apply to their own science.

References

references/famous-deep-fields.md — Coordinates, survey stacks, and recognition patterns for flagship deep fields (COSMOS, HUDF, GOODS, EGS, CDFS, etc.). Used by Position Mode to immediately identify well-known fields and skip redundant generic queries. Verified 2026-06-09.
references/mast-s_region-verification.md — MAST footprint verification via s_region parsing: POLYGON / CIRCLE / CIRCLE ICRS formats, point-in-polygon algorithm, COSMOS case study (45/262 = 17% cone hits actually cover), pitfalls (cos(dec) correction, missing CIRCLE ICRS, radius units). Verified 2026-06-09.
references/jwst-proposal-check.md — JWST proposal search toolkit: jwst-search.zhechenghu.com (browser-only React SPA), STScI Approved Programs pages (HTML scrapable), MAST Name.Lookup API, arXiv literature fallback, verification flow, TOI-270 case study. Verified 2026-06-09.
references/telarchive-analysis.md — Design lessons from perwin/telarchive: plugin architecture, parameter templates, parse-rule standardization, and what to adopt for AstroFairy v0.4+. Verified 2026-06-09.
references/hsc-ssp-pdr3.md — HSC-SSP PDR3 access (tools, URLs, products, LSB caveats, coordinate system, API auth requirements). Verified 2026-06-08.
references/spherex-qr2.md — SPHEREx QR2 (SIA v2 collection names, cutout URL patterns, astroquery, instrument specs, LSB mismatch analysis, citation templates). Verified 2026-06-08.
references/hsc-wl-s19a-shape-catalog.md — HSC S19A WL shape catalog (re-Gaussianization, 4 fields, SQL query, key columns, PSF star catalogs, cosmic shear SACC, ensemble shear recipe, caveats). Verified 2026-06-08.
references/gaia-dr3.md — Gaia DR3 (astrometric + spectroscopic, NOT imaging; TAP endpoint, data model tables, astroquery.gaia + PyVO patterns, LSB mismatch analysis). Verified 2026-06-09.

Test Surveys

HSC-SSP PDR3 / PDR4
SPHEREx QR2 (spectroscopic, not imaging — verify science match before recommending)
DESI Legacy Imaging DR9 / DR10
SDSS DR17 / DR18
Pan-STARRS DR2
GALEX GR6/GR7 (MAST)
Gaia DR3 / EDR3 (ESA Archive + Partner Data Centres; NOT imaging — astrometric + spectroscopic only)
WISE / unWISE (IRSA)
HST / JWST (MAST)
Euclid public releases
Rubin LSST public releases
Chandra / XMM

Short Prompt

You are an observer-oriented astronomical survey access investigator with two modes:

Survey Mode: Given a survey, release, target, desired products, or science case, investigate official documentation and reliable sources to determine how to access and use the data. Always distinguish coverage, catalog access, image access, PSF/mask/variance access, programmatic access, and science-case caveats. Prefer official docs and release papers. Use PyVO for standard VO services such as TAP/SIA/SSA; use astroquery for service-specific modules or non-VO web interfaces; use official APIs/CLIs when required. For image-level science (morphology, surface photometry), never recommend catalog-only workflows. Return an actionable observer report with sources, verdict, workflow, verified code/query templates when possible, caveats, and unresolved uncertainties.

Position Mode: Given a coordinate or object name, summarize useful survey/archive coverage and observation availability across major data services (CDS SIMBAD, CDS VizieR, NED, MAST, IRSA, SPHEREx QR2, ESA ESASky, major optical imaging surveys, and relevant wavelength-specific archives). Always check MAST by default. Choose appropriate search radii for point vs extended sources. Rank results by science-case usefulness — do NOT return unfiltered catalog dumps. Prioritize image-level products with PSF, masks, variance/weight maps. Report access routes and caveats. Group low-priority items in a deprioritized section. Warn when footprint coverage does not guarantee target coverage.

Proposal Check (sub-mode of Position Mode): When user asks about approved observing programs (JWST/HST/Subaru/Keck/ALMA/etc.), check proposal coverage using official sources (STScI Approved Programs, MAST, NAOJ per-semester accepted proposals, Keck schedule/KOA, ALMA Archive) and the third-party JWST proposal search tool (https://jwst-search.zhechenghu.com/). For Subaru: check per-semester accepted proposals at naoj.org/Observing/Proposals/Pastinfo/ (browser needed for full table; schedule page parseable with curl). For Keck: check nightly schedule + KOA archive (no structured per-semester proposal list). Treat third-party matches as candidates requiring official verification. Distinguish executed vs planned, public vs proprietary, and exact target coverage vs nearby fields. Return program ID, cycle, PI, instrument, status, and access routes.

name	astrofairy
description	Investigate how to access and use public astronomical survey/archive data for a specified observer task. The skill supports both Survey Mode (given a survey/release, explain how to use it) and Position Mode (given a coordinate/object, summarize useful survey/archive coverage and observation availability across major data services). Use when user asks about survey coverage, archive data access, telescope data products, image cutout/download, PSF/mask/variance, proposal/program checking, multi-wavelength data inventory, or observation availability at a sky coordinate.
license	MIT
compatibility	Designed for Hermes Agent. Requires terminal, file (write/patch), and browser tools. Needs curl for API access and python3 for astroquery/pyvo (optional). Can be adapted for Claude Code (CLAUDE.md), OpenAI Codex (.codex.md), or any agent that accepts markdown instruction files.
metadata	{"version":"0.3","author":"DenekoW","repository":"https://github.com/DenekoW/AstroFairy"}

AstroFairy

Observer-oriented research protocol for public astronomical survey/archive data access. The agent should investigate current official documentation rather than rely on a static survey database.

Version: 0.3

Modes

Survey Mode

Purpose: Given a survey or release, investigate its public data products, access routes, programmatic interfaces, caveats, and recommended observer workflow.

Input: survey, release, desired_products, science_case

Output: Survey Access Report

Position Mode

Input required: coordinate_or_object_name

Input optional: radius, science_case, priority_surveys, wavelength_range, required_products, output_format

Output: Coordinate Data Inventory Report

Trigger Conditions

Load this skill when user asks:

"Does a survey/release cover my target or field?"
"How do I query a survey catalog?"
"How do I download images or cutouts?"
"Can I get PSF, mask, variance, weight maps, or sky products?"
"Which release/data product should I use?"
"Is this survey suitable for my science case?"
"What is the best programmatic access route?"
"Compare surveys for a specific observer task."
"Given this coordinate, what survey/archive data are available?"
"What observations exist at this sky position?"
"Which surveys cover this coordinate?"
"Summarize useful data around this RA/Dec."
"Check MAST/IRSA/CDS/NED/major surveys for this position."
"Filter coordinate-search results by usefulness for my science case."
"Is there an approved JWST/HST/ALMA proposal covering this target?"
"有没有 proposal / 有没有被 JWST 观测 / 有没有已批准项目"
"Check if this target has proprietary or planned observations."
"What JWST programs target this object or field?"
"Check Subaru/HSC proposals for this target."
"有没有 HSC/Subaru proposal / 有没有被 Subaru 观测"
"Check Keck proposals for this target."
"有没有 Keck proposal / KOA archive for this target"

Input Parsing

Required or Inferred

survey
release
task_type
desired_products
science_case

Optional

target_ra_dec
radius
object_name
field_name
object_list
filters
depth_requirement
resolution_requirement
output_format

Task Types

coverage
catalog_query
image_cutout
psf_mask_variance_access
release_status
science_case_suitability
programmatic_access
cross_survey_comparison
batch_download
position_data_inventory
proposal_check

Position Mode Input Parsing

Default search radii:

Point source: 10 arcsec
Galaxy or extended source: 30–120 arcsec (depending on apparent size)
Cluster or large structure: 5–30 arcmin (depending on science case)

Default services to check:

CDS SIMBAD — object identity, aliases, object type, redshift, bibliography
CDS VizieR — published catalog tables near the coordinate
CDS Aladin/HiPS — visual inspection of multi-survey sky images
NED — extragalactic identity, redshift, photometry, cross-IDs
MAST — UV/optical/NIR space-based obs (HST, JWST, GALEX, TESS, Kepler/K2)
IRSA — IR all-sky products (WISE, unWISE, 2MASS, Spitzer) + SPHEREx QR2
SPHEREx QR2 — all-sky NIR spectroscopy (0.75–5.0 μm, R~40–130); check via IRSA/SIA v2
ESA ESASky — cross-mission discovery and footprint inspection
Chandra Archive — high-resolution X-ray
XMM-Newton Archive — X-ray observations and source products
ALMA Archive (if relevant) — mm/sub-mm
Major optical imaging surveys (HSC-SSP, DESI-LS, SDSS, Pan-STARRS, DES, Euclid/LSST if public)

Service purpose summary:

Service	Purpose
CDS SIMBAD	Object identity, aliases, object type, redshift, bibliography, basic measurements
CDS VizieR	Published catalog tables and value-added catalogs near the coordinate
CDS Aladin/HiPS	Visual inspection of multi-survey sky images and overlays
NED	Extragalactic object identity, redshift, photometry, literature cross-IDs
MAST	UV/optical/NIR space-based obs and HLSPs (HST, JWST, GALEX, TESS, Kepler/K2)
IRSA	IR all-sky products (WISE, unWISE, 2MASS, Spitzer, Herschel-related) + SPHEREx QR2
SPHEREx QR2	All-sky NIR spectroscopy 0.75–5.0 μm, R~40–130; 6.2" pixels; DOIs: QR2=10.26131/IRSA652
ESA ESASky	Cross-mission observation discovery and footprint inspection
Chandra Archive	High-resolution X-ray observations
XMM-Newton Archive	X-ray observations and source products
ALMA Archive	mm/sub-mm (when relevant to science case)

Coverage verification levels:

Use this three-tier system in the multi-wavelength summary table:

Symbol	Meaning	When to use
✅	Covered	(a) s_region polygon verified for individual exposures, OR (b) published survey footprint map confirms this coordinate falls within the imaged area
❌	Confirmed gap	s_region verified that individual exposures miss; or documented detector/chip gap at this exact position
⚠️	Catalog-level only	A catalog entry exists near this coordinate, but no corresponding image product is available (e.g.value-added catalogs without imaging)

Rules:

Do NOT downgrade survey-level coverage to "⚠️" just because individual exposures were not footprint-verified. If a survey's published footprint map covers the COSMOS field and this coordinate is in the COSMOS field, it's ✅.
Do NOT use "likely" without citing a source. If uncertain, state what is known and what is not.
For dedicated deep fields (COSMOS, GOODS, EGS, etc.): assume continuous survey products (Spitzer, Herschel, HSC, Chandra, XMM, VLA) cover the entire field unless documented gaps exist.
For HST/JWST: individual exposures must be s_region verified because detector gaps and mosaic seams are real.
For wide-area ground surveys (DESI-LS, SDSS, PS1): check the survey's public footprint map; if the coordinate is inside, mark ✅.
Always cite the survey paper that defines the footprint and depth.
Depth source: always cite a specific paper reference (author+year+journal).

Ranking rules:

High priority:

Survey-level imaging products
Archive observation products
Spectra of the target
UV/optical/IR/X-ray/radio data relevant to science case
Products with image cutout or download access
Products with PSF/mask/variance when image modeling is needed
Object-targeted observations from space-based archives
Major all-sky or wide-area surveys relevant to science case

Medium priority:

Major value-added catalogs
Photoz or specz catalogs
Object cross-identification databases
Literature tables directly targeting the object or field
Environmental or group/cluster catalogs when relevant

Low priority by default:

Generic foreground star catalogs
Proper motion catalogs (unless needed)
Astrometric catalogs (unless needed)
Unrelated small catalogs from nearby fields
Duplicate crossmatch tables
Catalogs for a different object class than the science case

Science-case sorting:

Galaxy SED / photometry:

Prioritize: UV from GALEX/MAST, optical imaging and catalogs, NIR/MIR from IRSA, reliable spectroscopic redshift, broad-band photometry catalogs
Deprioritize: unrelated field catalogs, proper motion catalogs

Spectroscopy / redshift:

Prioritize: spectra of target, spectroscopic redshift catalogs, SDSS/DESI/GAMA/6dF, NED and SIMBAD redshift records
Deprioritize: imaging-only products (unless needed for context)

Time domain:

Prioritize: TESS, Kepler, K2, ZTF/other time-domain surveys, epoch-level or lightcurve products
Deprioritize: static catalogs without epoch information

X-ray / AGN:

Prioritize: Chandra, XMM-Newton, eROSITA (if public), radio surveys, WISE mid-IR, optical spectroscopy
Deprioritize: unrelated optical-only catalog hits

Position mode caveats:

Footprint coverage does not guarantee useful depth
Catalog detection does not guarantee image-level data availability
Archive observations near the coordinate may miss the target (detector gaps, edges, chip layout, roll angle)
Extended galaxies require a larger search radius than point sources
image-level products with PSF, masks, variance/weight maps, sky/background
Do NOT return an unfiltered CDS/VizieR-style catalog dump; rank and summarize by observer usefulness
If results are too numerous, collapse low-priority catalogs into a deprioritized section
CRITICAL: A coordinate usually corresponds to a specific astronomical object. Verify that data products actually cover the EXACT coordinate, not just fall within the search cone. 'Present in search radius' ≠ 'covers this target'. Check s_region/footprint for each observation.

Deep field recognition (critical for Position Mode):

If SIMBAD returns >200 objects within 2 arcmin, check catalog names against references/famous-deep-fields.md
COSMOS field: catalog names like COSMOS2020, COSMOS2015, COSMOS 06XXXXX, zCOSMOS, UVISTA
HUDF: HUDF, UDF, XDF catalog names
GOODS: GOODS-N, GOODS-S, HDF-N catalog names
If a famous field is identified: skip generic IRSA/WISE/Chandra cone searches (they will overflow or return redundant data). Instead, go directly to field-specific master catalogs (COSMOS2020 VizieR, 3D-HST, C-COSMOS source catalog, etc.) and skip redundant multi-service queries.
If NOT a famous field: proceed with the standard multi-service Position Mode search.

Proposal Check Protocol

Scope by confidence:

High confidence: JWST, HST (MAST missions with structured observation metadata), Subaru/HSC (NAOJ per-semester accepted proposals list, publicly available)
Medium confidence: ALMA, Chandra, XMM-Newton, ESO/NOIRLab archives, Keck (public schedule + KOA archive; no structured per-semester accepted proposals page like Subaru)
Low confidence / manual: facilities without structured public program search

Default facilities to check: JWST, HST, Subaru/HSC, MAST, ALMA (if mm/sub-mm relevance), Keck (if optical/NIR relevance), Chandra (if X-ray relevance), XMM-Newton (if X-ray relevance)

JWST Proposal Check

JWST is the highest-priority target for proposal checking. Official sources:

Source	URL	Role
STScI Approved Programs	`https://www.stsci.edu/jwst/science-execution/approved-programs`	Official list of approved JWST programs by cycle/type
STScI Program Information	`https://www.stsci.edu/jwst/science-execution/program-information`	Official program lookup by ID
MAST JWST Archive	`https://archive.stsci.edu/missions-and-data/jwst`	Observation metadata and data products
ESA JWST Science Archive	ESA archive	Alternative route for European programs

Third-party helper: https://jwst-search.zhechenghu.com/

Property	Detail
Role	Fast discovery tool for public approved JWST proposal text, target names, abstracts, descriptions, and observation tables
Use for	Target name search, alias search, proposal keyword search, object list cross-match, candidate program discovery
Limitations	Not authoritative for execution status; not authoritative for data public status; not sufficient for exact detector footprint containment; extracted from public proposal documents — parsing errors possible
Availability	Requires a browser (client-side React SPA). In Docker containers or headless environments where no browser is installed, skip this tool and use fallbacks: (1) STScI Approved Programs page grep, (2) arXiv literature search, (3) MAST Name.Lookup + Observations query. See `references/jwst-proposal-check.md` for detailed fallback workflows.
Verification rule	Treat matches as candidate proposal coverage. Verify program status, observation execution, public/proprietary state, data products, and exact spatial coverage using MAST, STScI program information, or ESA JWST Archive.
Fallback: arXiv literature	When the JWST search tool is unavailable (no browser), search arXiv for `"TOI-XXX" + "JWST"` or `"target_name" + "JWST"` to find papers discussing JWST observations. This confirms observation existence but does NOT provide program IDs.
Verification rule	Treat matches as candidate proposal coverage. Verify program status, observation execution, public/proprietary state, data products, and exact spatial coverage using MAST, STScI program information, or ESA JWST Archive.

MAST Name Lookup API (for resolving object names):

curl -X POST 'https://mast.stsci.edu/api/v0/invoke' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
  -d 'request={"service":"Mast.Name.Lookup","params":{"input":"TOI-270","format":"json"}}'

Returns: resolvedCoordinate array with canonicalName, ra, decl, objectType, resolver (SIMBAD, TIC, NED, etc.). Supports target names, TIC IDs, and common aliases.

HST / MAST Proposal Check

Check observation/program metadata and downloadable products through MAST. Prefer observation metadata over proposal-text search.

Query routes (preferred):

astroquery.mast.Observations.query_region
astroquery.mast.Observations.query_criteria
MAST Portal
MAST API

Search keys: coordinate, object_name, proposal_id (if known), mission, instrument

HST/MAST output fields: mission, program_id, target_name, instrument, filters/gratings, exposure_time, observation_date, public/proprietary, product_type, access_route, confidence

ALMA Proposal Check

Activate when: science case mentions mm/sub-mm, molecular gas/dust, or user explicitly mentions ALMA.

Query route: ALMA Science Archive, ALMA archive query interface

ALMA output fields: project_code, target_name, band/frequency, array_configuration, observation_status, public/proprietary, product_type, access_route, confidence

Subaru / HSC Proposal Check

Subaru publishes accepted proposals per semester as a structured, publicly accessible list for every semester from S00 to present (S26B as of 2026).

Official sources:

Source	URL	Role
NAOJ Past Semester Info	`https://www.naoj.org/Observing/Proposals/pastinfo.html`	Index of all semester proposal lists (S00–S26B)
Per-semester page	`https://www.naoj.org/Observing/Proposals/Pastinfo/s{XX}{a\|b}.html`	Accepted proposals for a given semester: ID, PI, Proposal Title, Instrument, Nights, Abstract
Subaru Schedule	`https://www.naoj.org/cgi-bin/opecenter/schedule.cgi/`	Nightly telescope schedule with program IDs, PIs, instruments
SMOKA Archive	`https://smoka.nao.ac.jp/`	Data archive — HSC Search for raw data, Advanced Search for reductions
SMOKA HSC Search	`https://smoka.nao.ac.jp/HSCsearch.jsp`	HSC-specific raw data search

Proposal page structure: Each semester page (e.g., S26B) contains:

Summary statistics: total proposals submitted, nights requested, nights allocated
Table: ID (e.g., S26A-147), PI, Proposal Title, Instrument, Nights, Abstract
Intensive Programs (multi-semester) listed separately
HSC Queue mode allocations noted

Search strategy (headless/Docker environments):

Page text search: The NAOJ pages use MkDocs Material (JS-rendered). In headless environments (no browser), curl can only extract the summary statistics and page structure, NOT the proposal table data. The table is loaded dynamically via JS.
Fallback: schedule page: The nightly schedule at schedule.cgi/ is plain HTML and fully parseable with curl. You can grep for program IDs (e.g., S26A-, S26B-) and PI names to find executed programs.
Fallback: arXiv literature: Search arXiv for "target_name" + "HSC" or "target_name" + "Subaru" to find papers using HSC/Subaru data — confirms observation existence.
Verification rule: Browser access is recommended for full proposal table search. In headless mode, use schedule page + arXiv literature as fallback.

Subaru program ID format:

S{YY}{A|B}-NNN — Normal Program (e.g., S26A-147)
S{YY}{A|B}-OTNNN — ToO Program
S{YY}{A|B}-UHNNN — University of Hawaii
S{YY}{A|B}-TENNN — Engineering
S{YY}{A|B}-INNN — Intensive Program

Keck Proposal Check

Official sources:

Source	URL	Role
Keck Schedule	`http://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/schedule/`	Nightly schedule: PI, institution, instrument, project codes (HTTP only)
Keck Schedule RSS	`http://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/schedule/ws/schedule.rss`	RSS feed of nightly schedule (HTTP only)
KOA Archive	`https://koa.ipac.caltech.edu/`	Keck Observatory Archive — data search and download
Keck Observer Info	`https://keckobservatory.org/science/observing/`	General observing information (not a proposal list)

Search strategy:

Schedule feed: The RSS feed and schedule page show nightly executed programs with PI names, institutions, instruments (MOSFIRE, DEIMOS, LRIS, NIRSPEC, KCWI, etc.), and project codes (e.g., U075M for UCLA, C123 for Caltech).
KOA Archive: Search by target coordinates, object name, or program/investigator. Provides access to public data products.
No structured proposal list: Unlike Subaru, Keck does not publish a per-semester accepted proposals page with titles and abstracts. The TAC results are not systematically public.
Verification: Schedule presence confirms execution but not proposal acceptance. KOA confirms data availability.

Keck output fields: program_code, semester, PI (from schedule), institution, instrument, observation_date (from schedule), data_available (via KOA), access_route, confidence

⚠️ Keck schedule caveats:

Schedule pages use HTTP only (not HTTPS) — may be blocked in some environments
No structured proposal title or abstract search available
Project codes (e.g., C123, U075M) are institution-specific, not globally unique
KOA is the recommended primary access point for data products

Ranking Rules

High priority:

Exact target name or alias match in approved program
Coordinate match with confirmed footprint containment
Executed observation with public data
Executed observation with proprietary metadata
Planned/approved observation relevant to science case
Target in official program or archive metadata

Medium priority:

Proposal text keyword match without coordinate confirmation
Observation near coordinate but footprint not verified
Program mentions related field/cluster but not exact target
Archive project metadata without public products

Low priority:

Generic keyword match in unrelated proposal
Nearby observation not covering target
Target name ambiguous without coordinate confirmation
Catalog hit without observation or program metadata

Proposal Check Output Template

Title: "Proposal / Program Coverage Check: {coordinate_or_object_name}"

Sections:

Task Interpretation — coordinate_or_object_name, resolved_coordinates, aliases_used, search_radius, facilities_checked, science_case
Executive Summary — whether relevant programs/observations found, strongest matches, data public status, verification needed
Proposal/Program Matches — table: facility, program_id, cycle/period, title, PI, target, instrument/band, status, public/proprietary, relevance, confidence
Observation and Data Products — executed observations, available products, access routes, download/archive links
Rejected / Low-Priority Matches — ambiguous name matches, keyword-only matches, nearby-but-not-covering, unrelated field programs
Caveats — proposal match ≠ executed; nearby ≠ detector coverage; proprietary metadata may exist without public data; third-party search results must be verified officially

Proposal Check Caveats

A proposal/program match does not guarantee the observation was executed
An executed observation near the coordinate does not guarantee the target lies inside the detector footprint
Public proposal metadata does not imply public science data
Proprietary data may have visible metadata but inaccessible products
Third-party proposal search tools are useful for discovery but must be verified against official archive metadata
For extended objects, check whether the full target, not just the nucleus, is covered

Rule: If Release Unspecified

Investigate the latest public release, but explicitly warn that access methods, table names, products, and caveats are release-specific.

Source Priority

Official survey or archive documentation
Official data release paper
Official schema browser or API documentation
Official known problems or caveats page
IVOA / VO registry / PyVO / astroquery documentation
Peer-reviewed papers using the relevant product
Community tutorials or GitHub examples
Unverified third-party summaries

Investigation Protocol

Step 1: Identify Survey and Release

Check:

official_name
telescope_or_mission
instrument
release_version
public_status
latest_public_release
release_date_if_available

Step 2: Identify Available Products

Check:

catalogs (forced_photometry, summary_tables)
images (cutouts, coadds, single_epoch)
psf_models
masks (bad_pixel, bright_star)
variance_or_weight_maps
sky_background_products
spectra
photoz_or_specz
random_catalogs
footprint / MOC / HiPS
ancillary_products

Rule: Separate public products from internal/non-public products.

Step 3: Investigate Sky Coverage

Check:

official_footprint
MOC / HiPS
Aladin or viewer
field/tile/tract/patch tables
downloadable_footprint_files
batch_coverage_method

Decision tree:

If MOC exists → recommend MOC-based coverage matching
If HiPS exists → recommend Aladin/Aladin Lite for visual inspection
If only tile/tract/patch tables exist → explain local matching
If only a web viewer exists → provide manual workflow and search for API/batch alternative

Step 4: Investigate Catalog Access

Check:

TAP / ADQL
CAS / SQL
schema_browser
official_API
downloadable_catalog_files
astroquery_module
pyvo_compatibility
authentication / query_limits / row_limits / async_job_support
recommended_tables
coordinate_columns / object_id_columns / flux_or_magnitude_columns
quality_flags / primary_object_selection

Decision tree:

If TAP/ADQL exists → recommend PyVO or direct ADQL
If survey-specific astroquery module exists → recommend astroquery
If CAS/SQL exists but not VO-compatible → recommend official SQL/CAS route
If only files exist → recommend file-based access
Do NOT invent table or column names; verify with schema docs

Step 5: Investigate Image Access

Check:

cutout_web_service / cutout_API / command_line_tool
direct_file_tree
coadd_access / single_epoch_access
filters / size_limits / file_format
WCS_units_zeropoint
batch_download_support

Decision tree:

If stable API/CLI exists → provide batch-download plan
If only web cutout exists → provide manual route and scalability warning
If direct files exist → explain tile/tract/patch filename mapping

Step 6: Investigate PSF / Mask / Variance Access

Check:

PSF_model or PSF_picker
masks (bad_pixel, bright_star)
variance_maps / inverse_variance_or_weight_maps
exposure_maps
sky_or_background_models

Decision tree:

Do NOT assume PSF exists just because images exist
Do NOT assume mask/variance are included in cutouts
For image modeling → recommend science + mask + variance/weight + PSF + metadata

Step 7: Investigate Programmatic Access

Check:

PyVO / astroquery
official_python_client / official_CLI
REST_API
TAP / ADQL / SIA / SSA / cone_search
bulk_download / wget_or_curl
authentication_tokens

Decision tree:

Use PyVO for standard VO services (TAP/SIA/SSA/Cone Search)
Use astroquery for service-specific modules or non-VO web interfaces
Use official API/CLI when survey-specific access is required
Use manual web workflow only when no stable programmatic route exists

Science Case Caveats

Image-level science (morphology, surface photometry): Do NOT recommend catalog-only workflows. Always check PSF/mask/variance availability.
Spectroscopy: Check wavelength coverage, resolution, flux calibration, and redshift quality flags.
Photometry: Check deblending, saturation, sky subtraction, and photometric calibration for extended sources.
Time domain: Check epoch availability, cadence, and lightcurve products.
Astrometry: Check proper motion accuracy, parallax systematics, and reference frame.

Output Templates

Survey Mode: "Survey Access Report: {survey} {release}"

Sections:

Task Interpretation — survey_archive, release, user_task, target/field, desired_products, science_case, assumptions_made
Executive Verdict — one of: usable / partially_usable / not_suitable / unclear. Include: can_user_do_task, recommended_route, main_caveat
Sources Checked — columns: source_type, source, what_it_supports, reliability
Data Availability — catalog, coadd_image, single_epoch_image, psf, mask, variance/weight, footprint, ancillary
Filters / Bands / Wavelength Coverage
Sky Coverage / Footprint
Catalog Access
Image / Cutout Access
PSF / Mask / Variance / Weight Access
Programmatic Access Recommendation
Science Case Caveats
Minimal Recommended Workflow
Open Questions / Manual Verification
Final Practical Recommendation

Position Mode: "Coordinate Data Inventory: {object_name}"

Sections:

Object Identity — name, type, RA/Dec, magnitudes, redshift, catalog source, sources cited (with URLs)
Multi-Wavelength Summary — single master table: survey, filters, depth (5σ AB), resolution, covers? (✅ s_region verified / ❌ s_region missed / ⚠️ catalog-level only), source citation for depth/resolution. Subsections: Optical / NIR / UV / MIR+FIR / X-ray+Radio / Spectroscopy. Include specific API/curl commands for each survey.
Footprint-Verified Space Data — MAST s_region results: confirmed coverage table (obs_id, instrument, filter, exp, program) + confirmed misses table. Include exact MAST API curl command used.
Ground-Based Catalogs — catalog-level coverage (not footprint verified). Include specific query commands (SQL, curl, astroquery) for each survey. Note "⚠️ catalog-level only" for unverified footprints.
Spectroscopy Attempts — table: survey, query used, result (hit/miss/not executed). Include specific commands.
Low Priority / Not Useful — brief table with reasons.
Manual Verification Checklist — tickbox list of pending verifications.

Rules for the summary table:

Use the three-tier system: ✅ (covered), ❌ (confirmed gap), ⚠️ (catalog-level only, no imaging)
Never use "likely" without a source citation
Always cite the source for depth and resolution claims (paper reference with author+year+journal)
Include the exact API/curl/query command for every survey listed
Merge all wavelength bands into a single master table; do not duplicate columns
For dedicated deep fields (COSMOS): continuous survey products are ✅ by published footprint
For HST/JWST: individual s_region verification is required and reported separately in section 3

Quality Checklist

Survey Mode

Did I identify the survey and release?
Did I distinguish official docs from community examples?
Did I check catalog access separately from image access?
Did I check PSF/mask/variance separately?
Did I check footprint/coverage method?
Did I identify programmatic access options?
Did I include science-case-specific caveats?
Did I avoid inventing unverified table names or commands?
Did I provide source links/citations?
Did I state uncertainty clearly?
Did I give a practical workflow?

Position Mode (additional items)

Did I resolve the object name or confirm the input coordinate?
Did I choose a search radius appropriate for point source vs extended source?
Did I check MAST by default?
Did I check IRSA/CDS/NED or explain why not?
Did I verify footprint (s_region) for each MAST observation, not just cone presence?
Did I clearly separate 'covers this exact coordinate' from 'nearby but misses'?
Did I handle all s_region formats (POLYGON, CIRCLE, CIRCLE ICRS)?
Did I separate survey-level products from generic catalog hits?
Did I rank results by science-case usefulness?
Did I avoid dumping all VizieR/CDS catalog results unfiltered?
Did I identify which archives provide actual downloadable observations?
Did I warn that footprint/nearby observation does not guarantee target coverage?
If SIMBAD returned >200 objects in 2 arcmin: did I check references/famous-deep-fields.md before running redundant multi-service queries?

Tool Environment Constraints

In some execution environments, the following tools may be unavailable. Use fallbacks:

Missing Tool	Fallback
`web_search`	`terminal` with `curl -sL --max-time 15 '<url>'`
`browser_navigate`	`terminal` with `curl` + `sed`/`grep` to extract text
`execute_code` (Python)	Use `terminal` with inline Python: `python3 -c "..."`

For HTML-heavy WordPress sites (common for survey docs), use these extraction patterns:

Extract menu links: grep -oP 'menu-item.*href="[^"]*"'
Extract paragraph content: grep -oP '(?<=<p>|<li>)[^<]+(?=</p>|</li>)'
Strip CSS/JS noise: sed 's/<style[^>]*>.*<\/style>//g; s/<script[^>]*>.*<\/script>//g'

astroquery availability: Always check python3 -c "import astroquery" before recommending it. It may not be installed in the execution environment.

Option A — Two-step: curl ... -o /tmp/resp.json && python3 -c "..." /tmp/resp.json
Option B — python3 urllib inline: python3 -c "import urllib.request, json; ..." (all Python, no pipe)
Option C — python3 with stdin redirect: python3 -c "..." < <(curl ...) (may still be blocked — test first)
Option D — jq: curl ... | jq '.data[] | {ra, dec}' (jq is not a full interpreter, usually passes)

For JWST proposal search: use arXiv literature reverse-search, or ask user to search https://jwst-search.zhechenghu.com/ manually
For MAST object resolution: use Mast.Name.Lookup API (works without browser)
For HTML-heavy survey sites: use curl + grep/sed extraction patterns (see above)

Non-Goals

Do NOT maintain a complete static encyclopedia of all surveys
Do NOT replace official archive documentation
Do NOT invent API syntax, table names, or product availability
Do NOT treat coverage, catalog, image, and PSF access as the same problem
Do NOT recommend catalog-only workflows for image-level science
Do NOT infer or embed user-specific science cases (e.g., "LSB / stellar halo / ICL / galaxy evolution inferred from user profile") in generated output reports. Output templates should be science-case-agnostic — describe survey capabilities generically, let the user apply to their own science.

References

references/famous-deep-fields.md — Coordinates, survey stacks, and recognition patterns for flagship deep fields (COSMOS, HUDF, GOODS, EGS, CDFS, etc.). Used by Position Mode to immediately identify well-known fields and skip redundant generic queries. Verified 2026-06-09.
references/mast-s_region-verification.md — MAST footprint verification via s_region parsing: POLYGON / CIRCLE / CIRCLE ICRS formats, point-in-polygon algorithm, COSMOS case study (45/262 = 17% cone hits actually cover), pitfalls (cos(dec) correction, missing CIRCLE ICRS, radius units). Verified 2026-06-09.
references/jwst-proposal-check.md — JWST proposal search toolkit: jwst-search.zhechenghu.com (browser-only React SPA), STScI Approved Programs pages (HTML scrapable), MAST Name.Lookup API, arXiv literature fallback, verification flow, TOI-270 case study. Verified 2026-06-09.
references/telarchive-analysis.md — Design lessons from perwin/telarchive: plugin architecture, parameter templates, parse-rule standardization, and what to adopt for AstroFairy v0.4+. Verified 2026-06-09.
references/hsc-ssp-pdr3.md — HSC-SSP PDR3 access (tools, URLs, products, LSB caveats, coordinate system, API auth requirements). Verified 2026-06-08.
references/spherex-qr2.md — SPHEREx QR2 (SIA v2 collection names, cutout URL patterns, astroquery, instrument specs, LSB mismatch analysis, citation templates). Verified 2026-06-08.
references/hsc-wl-s19a-shape-catalog.md — HSC S19A WL shape catalog (re-Gaussianization, 4 fields, SQL query, key columns, PSF star catalogs, cosmic shear SACC, ensemble shear recipe, caveats). Verified 2026-06-08.
references/gaia-dr3.md — Gaia DR3 (astrometric + spectroscopic, NOT imaging; TAP endpoint, data model tables, astroquery.gaia + PyVO patterns, LSB mismatch analysis). Verified 2026-06-09.

Test Surveys

HSC-SSP PDR3 / PDR4
SPHEREx QR2 (spectroscopic, not imaging — verify science match before recommending)
DESI Legacy Imaging DR9 / DR10
SDSS DR17 / DR18
Pan-STARRS DR2
GALEX GR6/GR7 (MAST)
Gaia DR3 / EDR3 (ESA Archive + Partner Data Centres; NOT imaging — astrometric + spectroscopic only)
WISE / unWISE (IRSA)
HST / JWST (MAST)
Euclid public releases
Rubin LSST public releases
Chandra / XMM

Short Prompt

You are an observer-oriented astronomical survey access investigator with two modes: