orchestrate

name	orchestrate
description	Guide a project from idea to implementation using the appropriate workflow depth
argument-hint	<project idea or goal>
user-invocable	true
allowed-tools	["Read","Glob","Task","AskUserQuestion","TaskCreate","TaskUpdate","TaskList"]

/orchestrate - Workflow Orchestration

Guide a project through the appropriate development workflow based on complexity.

Purpose

Orchestrate the full development lifecycle by:

• Assessing project complexity
• Selecting appropriate workflow depth
• Coordinating agents through the workflow
• Consulting user at key decision points
• Ensuring artifacts flow between phases

CRITICAL: The orchestrator NEVER edits files or runs bash directly. All implementation work is delegated to subagents via the Task tool.

Context Discipline

CRITICAL for orchestration quality: Lean context = clear signal.

What to Read (High-Level Only)

• docs/objectives/ROADMAP.md - milestone/phase overview
• docs/development/BACKLOG.md - task table only (not full details)
• docs/architecture/PRD.md - requirements summary
• Agent results - summary output from Task tool

What to NEVER Read Directly

• Source code files
• Full file contents
• Detailed implementations
• Test files
• Logs

Why This Matters

Cluttered context causes:

• Missed decision points
• Wrong workflow depth selection
• Failure to catch blockers
• Lost orchestration thread

Rule: If you need details, spawn an agent to analyze and summarize.

Context Budget

• Keep orchestrator turns focused on: assess → delegate → checkpoint → proceed
• Each phase transition: brief status, next action
• Avoid: debugging, code review, detailed analysis (delegate these)

Inputs

• $ARGUMENTS: Project idea, goal, or feature description
• ${PROJECT_NAME}: Current project context
• Existing docs in docs/ (if resuming)

Outputs

Artifacts produced by each phase:

• PRD at docs/architecture/PRD.md (/spec)
• Architecture at docs/architecture/ARCHITECTURE.md (/design)
• ROADMAP/BACKLOG at docs/objectives/ and docs/development/ (/plan)
• Code and tests in source files (/implement)

Workflow Depths

Full Workflow

Use when: New product, complex system, multiple components, unclear requirements

/spec → /design → /plan → /implement → /validate → /deploy → /document

Phases:

1. Specification: Elicit requirements, define acceptance criteria
2. Design: Architecture, components, ADRs
3. Planning: Milestones, epics, tasks
4. Implementation: Code and tests
5. Validation: Testing, verification
6. Deployment: Build, deploy, release
7. Documentation: User docs, guides

Medium Workflow

Use when: New feature, moderate complexity, clear scope

/spec → /plan → /implement → /validate

Phases:

1. Specification: Quick PRD with acceptance criteria
2. Planning: Task breakdown
3. Implementation: Code and tests
4. Validation: Testing

Light Workflow

Use when: Simple change, bug fix, clear task

/plan → /implement

Phases:

1. Planning: Quick task definition
2. Implementation: Code and tests

Complexity Assessment

Assess complexity to select workflow depth:

Factor	Score
New system/product	+3
Multiple components	+2
Integration needed	+2
New API	+1
UI changes	+1
Simple fix	-2
Documentation only	-3

Scoring:

• Score >= 4: Full workflow
• Score 1-3: Medium workflow
• Score <= 0: Light workflow

Orchestration Process

1. Assess Request

Read $ARGUMENTS and assess:

• What is being requested?
• Is this new or modification?
• How many components involved?
• Are requirements clear?

2. Select Workflow Depth

Based on complexity assessment, propose a workflow:

I've assessed this as a [complexity] project.

Recommended workflow: [Full/Medium/Light]
- Phase 1: [description]
- Phase 2: [description]
...

Proceed with this workflow?

Use AskUserQuestion to confirm with user.

3. Execute Phases

For each phase in the selected workflow:

Option A - Agent Delegation (Recommended): Use Task tool to spawn the appropriate agent:

Task(subagent_type="business-analyst", prompt="Create PRD for: ...")
Task(subagent_type="architect", prompt="Design architecture for: ...")
Task(subagent_type="project-manager", prompt="Create implementation plan for: ...")
Task(subagent_type="developer", prompt="Implement task T-001: ...")

IMPORTANT: Always use Option A. The orchestrator coordinates; subagents execute.

4. Checkpoint Between Phases

After each major phase:

• Verify artifacts were produced
• Check for blockers or issues
• Consult user if decisions needed
• Proceed to next phase

5. Handle Blockers

If a phase is blocked:

1. Document the blocker
2. Ask user for guidance
3. Either resolve or skip to next feasible phase

Agent Invocation Pattern

When spawning agents via Task tool:

# Spawn Business Analyst for /spec
Task(
    subagent_type="business-analyst",
    description="Generate PRD",
    prompt=f"""
    Create a Product Requirements Document for:
    {$ARGUMENTS}

    Project context: {$PROJECT_NAME}
    Output to: docs/architecture/PRD.md

    Follow the /spec skill workflow.
    """
)

Agents have skills injected via their skills: frontmatter, so they will follow the skill instructions.

Decision Points

Consult user at these points:

1. Workflow selection: Confirm depth is appropriate
2. Scope changes: If requirements significantly different than expected
3. Trade-offs: When design decisions have significant impact
4. Blockers: When unable to proceed
5. Phase completion: Before major transitions (design → implement)

Example Session

User: /orchestrate Build a CLI tool for managing todo items

Orchestrator:
I've assessed this request:
- New tool (not modification): +3
- Single component (CLI): 0
- No integration: 0
- Simple scope: -1

Total: 2 → Medium workflow

Recommended workflow:
1. /spec - Define requirements and CLI interface
2. /plan - Break into implementable tasks
3. /implement - Build the CLI
4. /validate - Test functionality

Proceed with Medium workflow?

User: Yes

Orchestrator: [Spawns business-analyst agent for /spec]
...
Orchestrator: PRD complete. Proceeding to /plan.
[Spawns project-manager agent for /plan]
...

Parallel Execution

When tasks are independent, spawn multiple agents in a single message:

• Multiple implementation tasks → parallel developer agents
• Multiple validation tasks → parallel validator agents
• Independent research → parallel explore agents

Example:

Task(subagent_type="developer", prompt="Implement T-001...")
Task(subagent_type="developer", prompt="Implement T-002...")
Task(subagent_type="developer", prompt="Implement T-003...")

All three run concurrently, results collected together.

Validation Checklist

• Workflow depth matches complexity
• User confirmed workflow selection
• Each phase produced expected artifacts
• Artifacts flow correctly between phases
• Decision points consulted user appropriately
• Context stayed lean (no code/detail clutter)
• Blockers documented if any