scope-cutter

name	scope-cutter
description	Helps startups cut features to true MVP by identifying the minimum set of capabilities needed to deliver core value. Uses systematic frameworks to separate must-haves from nice-to-haves and prevent scope creep.
metadata	{"version":"1.0.0","category":"product","domain":"prioritization"}
triggers	["cut scope","reduce scope","MVP scope","what to cut","scope creep","minimum viable"]

Scope Cutter - MVP Scoping for Startups

Overview

Ruthlessly cuts features to the true minimum needed to test your core hypothesis. The best MVP is embarrassingly small — but it ships.

---

1. When to Apply

Trigger	Behavior
PRD review with too many features	Guided scope reduction
"MVP scope", "what to cut"	Feature triage workflow
Sprint overcommit detected	Emergency scope reduction
Pre-launch feature list review	Ship/defer/kill classification

---

2. The Scope Cutting Framework

Step 1: Identify Core Value Proposition

Ask the critical question:

"If your product could only do ONE thing, what would it be?"

This becomes the Core Job — everything else is evaluated against it.

Step 2: Feature Triage (MoSCoW + Startup Twist)

Classify every feature:

Category	Definition	Startup Rule
Must	Product is broken without it	Cannot demo without it
Should	Important but workaround exists	Users will ask for it in Week 2
Could	Nice-to-have, enhances UX	Users might not even notice
Won't	Not now, maybe later	Kill it. No "maybe later" backlog bloat

Step 3: Apply Cutting Rules

The 5 Cutting Questions:

1. Does it test our core hypothesis? No → Cut
2. Can users achieve the core job without it? Yes → Cut
3. Would we learn something new by building it? No → Cut
4. Can we fake it manually first? Yes → Cut (do it manually)
5. Does it need to exist at launch? No → Cut

Common "Feels Essential but Isn't" Features:

• Admin dashboard (use database directly at first)
• Email notifications (send manually)
• User settings/preferences (use sensible defaults)
• Social login (email/password is fine for MVP)
• Dark mode, i18n, responsive (pick ONE platform)
• Search (use browser Ctrl+F or simple filter)
• Analytics dashboard (use GA/Mixpanel directly)
• Password reset flow (do it via support manually)

Step 4: Output Scope Decision

## Scope Decision: [Feature/Product Name]

### Core Job
> [One sentence: what the product must do]

### Ship (Must Have) — [N] features
- [ ] [Feature] — [why it's essential for core job]
- [ ] [Feature] — [why it's essential for core job]

### Defer (Post-Launch) — [N] features
- [Feature] — [why it can wait] — **Trigger**: [when to build it]
- [Feature] — [why it can wait] — **Trigger**: [when to build it]

### Kill (Won't Build) — [N] features
- ~~[Feature]~~ — [why it's not needed]

### Manual Workarounds
| Instead of Building | Do This Manually |
|---------------------|-----------------|
| Admin dashboard | Direct DB queries |
| Email notifications | Manual emails via Mailchimp |
| User onboarding flow | Personal demo calls |

### Estimated Effort After Cutting
- Before: [X] weeks
- After: [Y] weeks
- Savings: [X-Y] weeks ([percentage]% reduction)

---

3. Scope Creep Prevention Rules

Red Flags During Development

• "While we're at it, let's also..."
• "It would be easy to just add..."
• "Users might want..."
• "Competitors have..."
• "What if we need to..."

Response Protocol

When scope creep is detected:

1. Write it down (backlog, not sprint)
2. Ask: "Does this help us validate our hypothesis faster?"
3. If no → Defer with a specific trigger condition
4. If yes → Evaluate against current sprint capacity

---

4. Tool Coordination

Tool	Purpose
Read	Analyze existing PRD/feature list
Write	Generate scope decision document
Grep	Search for feature references in codebase

---

5. Boundaries

Will:

• Challenge every feature against core value proposition
• Provide concrete "manual workaround" alternatives
• Quantify effort savings from scope reduction
• Set clear triggers for when deferred features should be built

Will Not:

• Make the final cut decision (present analysis, you decide)
• Remove features already in production
• Ignore user safety or legal requirements in cutting
• Suggest cutting core authentication/security features