用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatform --skill recover命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | recover |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| description | [Utilities] Use when you need to restore workflow context from checkpoint after session loss. |
| disable-model-invocation | false |
Goal: Restore workflow state and todo items from checkpoint files after context loss or session interruption.
Workflow:
checkpoint-*.md in reports directory (legacy memory-checkpoint-*.md are also recognized)Key Rules:
plans/reports/ and plan-specific report directoriesBe skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).
Restore workflow state and todo items from checkpoint files after context compaction or session loss.
Use this command when:
Look for checkpoint files in the reports directory:
ls -la plans/reports/checkpoint-*.md | tail -5
Or search for all recent checkpoints:
find plans -name "checkpoint-*.md" -mmin -60 | head -5
Read the most recent checkpoint to understand the saved state:
Read the checkpoint file at: plans/reports/checkpoint-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS-slug.md
The checkpoint file contains a JSON metadata block at the end:
{
"sessionId": "...",
"activePlan": "plans/YYMMDD-slug/",
"workflowType": "feature",
"currentStep": "feature-implement",
"remainingSteps": ["test", "code-review"],
"pendingTodos": [...]
}
IMMEDIATELY call TaskCreate with the pending todos from the checkpoint:
[
{ "content": "[Workflow] /feature-implement - Implement", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing /feature-implement" },
{ "content": "[Workflow] /test - Run tests", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing /test" },
{ "content": "[Workflow] /code-review - Review code", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing /code-review" }
]
If activePlan is set in the metadata, read the plan file:
Read: {activePlan}/plan.md
Resume from the currentStep identified in the metadata. Execute the remaining workflow steps in order.
| Scenario | Recovery Type | Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Session resume after compact | Manual | This /recover command — static CLAUDE.md re-read re-anchors protocol; recovery is skill-driven |
| New session in same directory | Manual | This /recover command |
| Explicit user request | Manual | This /recover command |
| No workflow state found | Manual | This /recover command |
Checkpoints are saved to different locations based on context:
{plan-path}/reports/checkpoint-*.mdplans/reports/checkpoint-*.mdLegacy
memory-checkpoint-*.mdfiles (written before the grammar was unified) are still matched by the resume/recover globs — back-read is preserved, nothing on disk is orphaned.
/checkpoint - Create a manual checkpoint (before expected loss)/compact - Manually trigger context compaction/context - Load project context/watzup - Generate progress summaryUser: /recover
Claude: Let me find and restore your workflow context.
1. Finding latest checkpoint...
Found: plans/reports/checkpoint-20260110-143025-new-feature.md
2. Reading checkpoint metadata...
- Workflow: feature
- Current step: /feature-implement
- Remaining: /test, /code-review
- Active plan: plans/260110-1430-new-feature/
3. Restoring TaskCreate items...
[Calling TaskCreate with 3 pending items]
4. Reading active plan...
[Reading plans/260110-1430-new-feature/plan.md]
5. Ready to continue from /feature-implement step.
Shall I proceed with the implementation?
[IMPORTANT] Use
TaskCreateto break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ATTENTION ask user whether to skip.
AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task:
Re-read files after context changes. Context compaction, resume, or long-running work can make memory stale; verify current files before acting. Verify generated content against source evidence. AI hallucinates APIs, names, claims, and document facts. Check the relevant source before documenting or referencing. Check downstream references before deleting or renaming. Removing an artifact can stale docs, generated mirrors, configs, and callers; map references first. Trace the full impact chain after edits. Changing a definition can miss derived outputs and consumers. Follow the affected chain before declaring done. Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. One green check is not all green checks; validate every output surface the change can affect. Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing. Before changing a constant, limit, flag, wording, or pattern, read nearby context and history. Surface ambiguity before acting — don't pick silently. Multiple valid interpretations require an explicit question or stated assumption with risk. Keep shared guidance role-relevant. Universal guidance must help every receiving skill or agent; code-specific obligations belong only in code-specific protocols.
Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.
MUST ATTENTION apply critical + sequential thinking — every claim needs appropriate traced evidence (file:line for repo/code claims; source URL or artifact section for research, product, content, and docs claims); confidence >80% to act, <60% DO NOT recommend. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact, admit uncertainty freely, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence.
MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — verify generated content against evidence, trace downstream references before deleting or renaming, verify all affected outputs, re-read files after context loss, and surface ambiguity before acting.
Protocols in force (concise digest of the SYNC/shared blocks this skill carries):
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using TaskCreate BEFORE starting
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite file:line evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality
[TASK-PLANNING] Before acting, analyze task scope and systematically break it into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using TaskCreate.