菜单
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
| name | writing-skills |
| description | Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment |
Writing skills IS Test-Driven Development applied to process documentation.
You write test cases (pressure scenarios with subagents), watch them fail (baseline behavior), write the skill (documentation), watch tests pass (agents comply), and refactor (close loopholes).
Core principle: If you didn't watch an agent fail without the skill, you don't know if the skill teaches the right thing.
REQUIRED BACKGROUND: You MUST understand superpowers:test-driven-development before using this skill.
A skill is a reference guide for proven techniques, patterns, or tools. Skills help future Claude instances find and apply effective approaches.
Skills are: Reusable techniques, patterns, tools, reference guides
Skills are NOT: Narratives about how you solved a problem once
| TDD Concept | Skill Creation |
|---|---|
| Test case | Pressure scenario with subagent |
| Production code | Skill document (SKILL.md) |
| Test fails (RED) | Agent violates rule without skill (baseline) |
| Test passes (GREEN) | Agent complies with skill present |
| Refactor | Close loopholes while maintaining compliance |
| Write test first | Run baseline scenario BEFORE writing skill |
| Watch it fail | Document exact rationalizations agent uses |
| Minimal code | Write skill addressing those specific violations |
Create when:
Don't create for:
skills/
skill-name/
SKILL.md # Main reference (required)
supporting-file.* # Only if needed
Frontmatter (YAML):
name and descriptionname: Use letters, numbers, and hyphens only (no parentheses, special chars)description: Third-person, describes ONLY when to use (NOT what it does)
---
name: Skill-Name-With-Hyphens
description: Use when [specific triggering conditions and symptoms]
---
# Skill Name
## Overview
What is this? Core principle in 1-2 sentences.
## When to Use
Bullet list with SYMPTOMS and use cases
## Core Pattern
Before/after code comparison
## Quick Reference
Table or bullets for scanning common operations
## Implementation
Inline code for simple patterns
## Common Mistakes
What goes wrong + fixes
CRITICAL: Description = When to Use, NOT What the Skill Does
Testing revealed that when a description summarizes the skill's workflow, Claude may follow the description instead of reading the full skill content. The description should ONLY describe triggering conditions.
# ❌ BAD: Summarizes workflow
description: Use when executing plans - dispatches subagent per task with code review between tasks
# ✅ GOOD: Just triggering conditions
description: Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
Keyword Coverage:
NO SKILL WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST
This applies to NEW skills AND EDITS to existing skills.
Write skill before testing? Delete it. Start over.
No exceptions:
Run pressure scenario WITHOUT the skill. Document exact behavior:
Write skill that addresses those specific rationalizations. Run same scenarios WITH skill. Agent should now comply.
Agent found new rationalization? Add explicit counter. Re-test until bulletproof.
RED Phase:
GREEN Phase:
REFACTOR Phase:
Deployment:
After writing ANY skill, you MUST STOP and complete the deployment process. Do NOT create multiple skills in batch without testing each.
Creating skills IS TDD for process documentation.
Same Iron Law: No skill without failing test first. Same cycle: RED (baseline) ➜ GREEN (write skill) ➜ REFACTOR (close loopholes).