菜单
Review touched tests and test-adjacent code for style, Result-returning patterns, panic helpers, unwrap/expect use, and obvious coverage gaps. Use when a broad review needs a dedicated test pass or when the user asks for test-review specifically.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Drafts a GitHub issue title and body using the target repository's issue templates under .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE. Use when the user asks to create, draft, or file a GitHub issue, bug report, feature request, chore, documentation issue, or RFC proposal, or wants issue text that matches the repo's template.
Drafts implementation plans with TDD, documentation updates, and repository verification commands before coding. Use when the user asks for an implementation plan, /create-plan, or structured pre-implementation design for work in encero workspaces (e.g. Incan, IncQL).
Generate a PR description following the repository's pull request template. Use when the user asks to create, draft, or generate a PR description for a pull request. The skill automatically locates the PR template in the target repository and fills it in based on the git diff.
Detect, triage, de-duplicate, and raise compiler bug reports when an agent encounters a likely compiler defect during implementation, review, testing, or issue work. Use when a task surfaces an ICE, panic, wrong accept/reject behavior, miscompile, lowering/emission bug, diagnostic bug, formatter/LSP/frontend drift, or other likely compiler/tooling defect; pause current work, minimize the repro, decide whether the bug blocks the task or has a valid workaround, check whether it is already reported, and then use create-github-issue to raise the bug.
Run a high-thoroughness end-to-end implementation loop using clean worker worktrees, per-slice planning, implementation, explicit review/fix iteration, orchestrator integration, and final commit/PR drafting. Use when the user explicitly wants a Ralph/Wiggum-style loop, autonomous multi-agent execution, a delegated feature/bugfix carried from confirmed scope through review-ready completion, or RFC-driven implementation that should be reviewed, bumped to In Progress, decomposed into phases, and executed through nested sub-loops. Supports Codex subagents by default and external CLI workers such as OpenCode when explicitly requested and available.
Prepare to work on a GitHub issue or RFC. Use when the user says /start-work, asks to start an issue, begin an RFC implementation, or pick up a task. Creates the branch, gathers context, and checks learnings.
| name | review-test-style |
| description | Review touched tests and test-adjacent code for style, Result-returning patterns, panic helpers, unwrap/expect use, and obvious coverage gaps. Use when a broad review needs a dedicated test pass or when the user asks for test-review specifically. |
/review-test-style is a narrow report-only reviewer for touched tests and code changes that imply missing test coverage.
Own:
ResultDo not own:
Write a slice report at:
.agents/state/review-report.test-style.mdDo not write to the canonical .agents/state/review-report.md.
.unwrap() / .expect() in testspanic!-driven helper/control flow where Result + assertions would be clearerKeep slice reports findings-first. Only list clean surfaces when they are materially useful to the orchestrator.
# Review Slice Report
- role: test-style
- worker: <agent-id or stable label>
- status: in_progress | clean | blocked
## Scope
- assigned files:
- tests/integration_tests.rs
## Findings
- [ ] warning | test-gap | panic helper | src/cli/mod.rs:84
Test helper uses panic-oriented control flow instead of `Result` + assertions.
## Reviewed Clean Surfaces
- tests/integration_tests.rs — touched lifecycle coverage reviewed; no additional findings
If there are no findings, say so explicitly.