| name | youtube-strategy |
| description | Use when a YouTube channel needs a system-level decision — positioning and niche, upload cadence, how videos chain into playlists and series, end-screen routing, or a what-is-working review — read from and written back to the channel's own learning wiki rather than one video's choices. NOT generating next-video topics (that is `youtube-ideation`), NOT per-video titles or thumbnail text (that is `youtube-packaging`), NOT designing the thumbnail image (that is `youtube-thumbnails`), NOT fetching metrics from the Data API (that is `youtube-api`). |
| tags | ["youtube","channel-strategy","positioning","cadence","playlists","retention"] |
| recommends | ["youtube-ideation","youtube-packaging","youtube-api","content-engine","decision-records"] |
| origin | risco |
YouTube Strategy — The Channel as a System, Not the Next Video
You operate at channel/portfolio altitude. You decide the territory (what this channel is, who it is for) and the system (cadence, how videos chain, what to double down on) over months. You do not pick the next video's topic, write its title, or fetch its metrics — those are single-asset jobs you route out. Mixing altitudes is the #1 reason YouTube advice goes generic: a channel decision answered with per-video tactics produces noise.
Your spine is a read/write loop with the channel's own history. You read accumulated learnings before deciding and write the decision back, so the next session compounds instead of restarting from generic blog advice.
Altitude boundary — route single-asset work out
| The ask | Skill | Why it is not you |
|---|
| Topics/hooks for the next upload | ../youtube-ideation/SKILL.md | You set the territory; ideation fills it. |
| Title + thumbnail text + description for one video | youtube-packaging | You set the positioning packaging must express; it executes per upload. |
| The thumbnail image itself | ../youtube-thumbnails/SKILL.md | Image design is a craft asset, not a channel decision. |
| Pull metrics / OAuth / quotas / report endpoints | youtube-api | You consume numbers; you do not fetch them. |
| Render or edit the video | remotion-video | Production, not strategy. |
| Cross-platform calendar / scheduling | ../content-engine/SKILL.md, ../social-publisher/SKILL.md | Multi-platform planning and posting, not YouTube channel architecture. |
You are the only YouTube skill that works at channel/portfolio altitude and persists decisions to the wiki. Every sibling works on a single asset.
The wiki loop comes FIRST (this is the spine)
Before any strategy decision, READ 02-DOCS/wiki/youtube/. Why: a strategy decision made without the channel's own retention/CTR history regresses to generic advice that ignores what this specific audience rewards.
Extract, in order:
- Prior positioning — what the channel claimed to be, and whether it held.
- Current cadence + whether it held — the stated rate and whether quality dropped at it.
- Top retention/CTR performers — which videos/playlists earned the watch time, and what they share.
- Killed experiments — series or formats already sunset, so you do not re-propose a dead bet.
If 02-DOCS/wiki/youtube/ is empty or absent → bootstrap it: create the directory and a positioning stub, then proceed. Do not skip the loop because the dir is missing — create it and start the record now. Layout and templates are in references/wiki-records.md.
Cite what you grounded in (e.g. "cadence held at 2/wk per 02-DOCS/wiki/youtube/decisions/2026-03-cadence.md"). If you grounded in nothing because the wiki was empty, say so and say you are bootstrapping.
Positioning & niche
Positioning sits at a three-factor intersection. Pick the niche where all three overlap:
- Sustained interest — you can make 100+ videos here without burning out. Why: cadence dies the moment the topic bores the creator.
- Measurable audience demand — searches/views exist for it. Why: passion without demand is a diary.
- Monetization potential — CPM and competition leave room. Why: a niche with no advertiser value caps the channel's ceiling regardless of views.
(TubeBuddy; OutlierKit CPM-ranked niches, 2026.)
Niche down 2–3 levels. "Gaming / cooking / tech" are industries, not niches. The algorithm matches a narrow channel to interested viewers more precisely, so at identical production quality a focused channel outgrows a topic-hopper, and "the go-to channel for X" is achievable in 6–12 months. Walk the ladder:
industry → category → angle → who-it's-for
tech → keyboards → budget mechanical boards → programmers who type all day
gaming → roguelikes → honest sub-$20 reviews → players who buy on a budget
- Bad: "a tech channel." (an industry — competes with everyone, recommended to no one specifically)
- Good: "honest reviews of budget mechanical keyboards for programmers." (a defensible go-to position)
Broad vs narrow — decide by stage and goal:
| Channel stage / goal | Lean | Why |
|---|
| New, <1k subs, finding fit | Narrow hard | Precision recommendation beats reach; you need a foothold, not a category. |
| Validated niche, want to grow share | Stay narrow, deepen | Become the answer in the niche before widening. |
| Established authority expanding | Adjacent widen only | Move to a neighboring angle, never jump industries — the audience graph breaks. |
| Topic-hopping with flat subs | Narrow now | Breadth is the diagnosis, not the cure. |
Cadence
Rule: pick the highest rate you can hold for 8 weeks without a quality drop. Why: cadence is an algorithmic channel-health signal — predictable channels get more aggressive recommendation pushes because YouTube knows there is consistent inventory to recommend (AIR Media-Tech, 2026) — but a quality cliff erases that benefit instantly. Consistency of strong videos beats raw frequency.
Baselines, used as a starting frame, then corrected by the wiki's own retention data, not by a blog number:
- New channels: 1–2/week.
- Many mid-size channels validate at 2–4/week.
Run the gate before committing to a rate. If any answer is "no," step the cadence down a notch:
If wiki retention shows watch time falling while cadence held steady, the problem is not "post more" — it is idea/packaging/structure (see the review loop). Raising cadence on a quality problem accelerates the decline.
Channel architecture — playlists, series, end screens
The algorithm scores session watch time — whether your video extends the viewer's stay on the platform — and pushes channels that reliably start or extend sessions (SolveigMM, 2025). So you do not design videos in isolation; you design chains.
- Playlists are binge paths, not folders. A playlist titled to promise a journey ("Build a SaaS from zero") outperforms a dumping ground ("My videos 2026"). Strategic playlists + end screens can lift session time ~10–30% (Boss Wallah; Gyre, 2026).
- Series Playlists signal intended watch order and raise autoplay continuation. Use them when sequence matters.
- End screens route to the next logical video, not your most popular one — relevance keeps the session alive.
The reliable shape is a deliberate sequence:
Part 1 (hook + promise) → Part 2 (payoff) → Case Study (proof) → Q&A (depth)
Each step end-screens to the next; the playlist holds them in order. Deeper patterns and session-time mechanics are in references/channel-architecture.md.
Review & double-down loop
A review is not "are views up." It is reading the wiki to find the rising signal and acting on it:
Read what-worked + retention notes
│
Is watch time rising while cadence held steady?
│
┌────┴──────────────┬─────────────────────┐
RISING PLATEAUED DECLINING
│ │ │
idea/packaging/ diagnose: is it the sunset the series —
structure is idea (CTR low) or reallocate the slot;
working → DOUBLE the structure log it killed so it
DOWN: more of (AVD low)? route is never re-proposed
that format/angle the weak half out
Read CTR (>~6% is healthy for new channels) and AVD/retention from the wiki to choose the next bet (EntreResource; AIR Media-Tech, 2026). When watch time rises at steady cadence, the win is in idea/packaging/structure — that is the signal to scale that format. Kill series with flat or declining retention rather than nursing them; a dead slot is better spent.
Write the decision back (on exit, always)
A strategy session that does not write back does not compound — the next session starts from zero. On exit, append a dated decision record under 02-DOCS/wiki/youtube/ and, when reviewing, a what-worked entry tied to specific videos/playlists. Minimal record inline; full templates in references/wiki-records.md:
---
type: youtube-strategy-record
title: Niche down to budget mechanical keyboards for programmers
description: Reposition from broad tech reviews to budget mechanical keyboards for programmers; hold 2/wk cadence.
tags: [youtube, strategy-decision, positioning]
timestamp: 2026-06-02T00:00:00Z
---
# 2026-06-02 — Niche down to budget mechanical keyboards for programmers
- Context read: flat subs at 40 videos; top 3 by AVD all keyboard reviews ([what-worked.md](./what-worked.md))
- Decision: reposition from "tech reviews" to "budget mechanical keyboards for programmers"; cadence 2/wk held
- Bets on metric: AVD on keyboard videos (currently ~48%) holding while non-keyboard topics are dropped
- Review date: 2026-09-02
02-DOCS/wiki/ is an OKF v0.1 bundle: every record carries a non-empty type (youtube-strategy-record) above the body, and cross-references use standard markdown links (never [[wikilinks]]). Every record names the metric it is betting on and a review date. A decision with no metric is an opinion, not a bet you can later check. Run scripts/verify.sh 02-DOCS/wiki/youtube/ after writing to confirm the records are structurally complete (date, Decision:, metric, and type). Full templates in references/wiki-records.md.
Anti-patterns
| Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Do instead |
|---|
| Chasing daily uploads | Hits the quality cliff; weak inventory drags the whole channel's recommendation health | Pick the rate you can hold 8 weeks at quality |
| Copying another channel's cadence | Their data is not yours; their audience rewards different things | Set cadence from your own wiki retention |
| Treating playlists as storage folders | No binge promise, no session lift | Build titled binge paths and series in watch order |
| Positioning as an industry ("a tech channel") | Competes with everyone, recommended to no one | Niche down 2–3 levels to a defensible angle |
| Deciding without reading the wiki | Regresses to generic blog advice that ignores this audience | READ 02-DOCS/wiki/youtube/ before any decision |
| Never writing the decision back | No compounding; every session restarts from zero | Append a dated record + the metric it bets on |
| "Post more" to fix falling retention | Accelerates the decline; the problem is idea/structure | Diagnose CTR vs AVD; fix the weak half |
| Jumping industries to grow | Breaks the audience graph; old subs churn | Widen only into adjacent angles |
References & routing
references/wiki-records.md — file layout under 02-DOCS/wiki/youtube/, the decision-record and what-worked templates, and what verify.sh checks.references/channel-architecture.md — deeper playlist/Series-Playlist/end-screen patterns, session-time mechanics, and binge-sequence examples.- Route out: next-video ideas →
../youtube-ideation/SKILL.md; per-video packaging → youtube-packaging; raw metrics → youtube-api; decision-record discipline → decision-records.
