一键导入
literature-review
Organize and synthesize research papers for literature review sections. Extract key findings, identify gaps, and structure related work sections.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Organize and synthesize research papers for literature review sections. Extract key findings, identify gaps, and structure related work sections.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
Write academic abstracts for thesis, journal articles, and conference papers. Follow IMRAD or structured formats with appropriate length.
Guide for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods data analysis. Statistical test selection, interpretation, and tool recommendations (SPSS, R, Python).
Check research ethics compliance for human subjects research. Covers consent, confidentiality, risk assessment, and approval requirements.
Academic proofreading for grammar, style, and consistency. Fix common errors while maintaining formal academic tone.
Select and justify research methodology. Compare approaches, choose designs, and write methodology chapters for thesis and research proposals.
Interpret quantitative and qualitative findings for Discussion sections. Explain results, relate to literature, and discuss implications.
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | literature-review |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| description | Organize and synthesize research papers for literature review sections. Extract key findings, identify gaps, and structure related work sections. |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Write","Edit"] |
Organize dan synthesize research papers untuk literature review chapter/section.
For each paper, collect:
Author(s):
Year:
Title:
Journal/Conference:
Key Findings:
Methodology:
Limitations:
Relevance to your study:
Structure:
3.2 Literature Review
3.2.1 AI Applications in Education
Smith (2020) utilized neural networks to...
Chen (2021) extended this by incorporating...
Gap: Limited focus on primary education
3.2.2 Student Performance Metrics
Abdullah (2022) measured effectiveness via...
Gap: Most studies rely on quantitative measures only
3.2.3 Research Gap
While existing studies examine X and Y, few address Z...
Structure:
Early work by Jones (2015) established...
Subsequently, Wang (2018) challenged this by...
Recent studies (Smith, 2020; Chen, 2021) suggest...
Structure:
Quantitative approaches (Abdullah, 2022; Lee, 2023)...
In contrast, qualitative studies (Kumar, 2021)...
Mixed methods remain underexplored...
Check each paper for:
Topic: AI in Malaysian Education
Sources:
Draft:
Research on AI in education has primarily focused on developed contexts. Smith (2020) examined AI implementation in US schools using a quantitative approach, finding significant improvements in student outcomes. However, Chen (2021) reported mixed results in a Chinese context using mixed methods, suggesting cultural factors may influence effectiveness. Extending this to developing contexts, Kumar (2022) conducted qualitative research in India, identifying infrastructure challenges absent in Western studies.
Gap: Despite these contributions, limited research has examined AI in Malaysian educational settings, which possess distinct cultural and infrastructural characteristics. Furthermore, existing studies predominantly focus on secondary education, leaving primary education underexplored.
Link: Therefore, this study investigates AI adoption in Malaysian primary schools, addressing both the geographical and educational-level gaps in current literature.