一键导入
to-issues
Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Guidance for Worktrunk (the `wt` CLI) — git worktree management, hooks, and config. Load when editing .config/wt.toml or ~/.config/worktrunk/config.toml; adding, modifying, or debugging hooks (post-merge, post-start, pre-commit, pre-merge, post-switch, etc.); configuring commit message generation or command aliases; or troubleshooting wt behavior. Also answers general worktrunk/wt questions.
Use when a repository contains a `justfile` or `.justfile` and work should flow through `just` recipes instead of ad-hoc shell commands. Covers recipe discovery, execution, debugging, and concise recipe authoring/refactoring for repeatable project tasks.
Offer optional 10-15 minute deliberate learning exercises during AI-assisted coding. Use when the user asks for a learning opportunity, deliberate practice, retrieval check-in, prediction exercise, teach-back, or when substantial work created a good moment to offer learning. Do not use for ordinary implementation unless the user explicitly wants learning.
Write effective pull request description bodies that explain what changed, why it changed, reviewer focus, validation, and risk. Use when creating, reviewing, or improving PR descriptions for internal work, OSS contributions, infra changes, migrations, or WIP requests for early feedback.
Write and edit substantial human-facing prose with clear, concise technical style while preserving the user's canonical voice from `~/.config/opencode/TONE.md`. Use for documentation, README prose, PR descriptions, commit-message bodies, changelog notes, issue summaries, long-form explanations, UI/help text, error messages, and copyediting drafts for clarity, concision, structure, tone, and tradeoffs.
Audit and safely clean low-value, redundant, misleading, flaky, over-mocked, or AI-generated unit tests. Use when asked to clean useless tests, prune test suites, remove redundant tests, audit low-value tests, improve test signal, clean brittle snapshots, reduce test noise, review coverage theater, or decide whether tests should be kept, rewritten, consolidated, moved, quarantined, or deleted.
| name | to-issues |
| description | Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Break a plan into independently-grabbable issues using vertical slices (tracer bullets).
The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you — run /setup-matt-pocock-skills if not.
Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes an issue reference (issue number, URL, or path) as an argument, fetch it from the issue tracker and read its full body and comments.
If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Issue titles and descriptions should use the project's domain glossary vocabulary, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.
Look for opportunities to prefactor the code to make the implementation easier. "Make the change easy, then make the easy change."
Break the plan into tracer bullet issues, following the Vertical slice rules. A wide refactor is the exception to that rule — slice it by expand–contract instead (see Wide refactors).
Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each slice, show:
Ask the user:
Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.
For each approved slice, publish a new issue to the issue tracker using the Issue body template. These issues are considered ready for AFK agents, so publish them with the correct triage label unless instructed otherwise.
Publish issues in dependency order (blockers first) so you can reference real issue identifiers. Where the tracker supports it, link each slice to its parent as a native sub-issue and wire each blocker as a native blocking edge (mechanics in the issue-tracker doc); the ## Parent and ## Blocked by body sections are the fallback otherwise.
Do NOT close or modify any parent issue.
Each issue is a thin vertical slice that cuts through ALL integration layers end-to-end, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer.
A wide refactor is one mechanical change — rename a column, retype a shared symbol — whose blast radius fans across the whole codebase, so a single edit breaks thousands of call sites at once and no vertical slice can land green. Don't force it into a tracer bullet; sequence it as expand–contract. First expand: add the new form beside the old so nothing breaks. Then migrate the call sites over in batches sized by blast radius (per package, per directory), each batch its own issue blocked by the expand, keeping CI green batch to batch because the old form still exists. Finally contract: delete the old form once no caller remains, in an issue blocked by every migrate batch. When even the batches can't stay green alone, keep the sequence but let them share an integration branch that all block a final integrate-and-verify issue — green is promised only there.
A reference to the parent issue on the issue tracker (if the source was an existing issue, otherwise omit this section).
A concise description of this vertical slice. Describe the end-to-end behavior, not layer-by-layer implementation.
Avoid specific file paths or code snippets — they go stale fast. Exception: if the /prototype skill produced code that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), add a context pointer to where that prototype code lives rather than inlining it.
Or "None - can start immediately" if no blockers.