菜单
Draft or improve related work sections with proper citation organization and positioning
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Draft or rewrite paper abstracts using structured formulas and venue-specific conventions
Citation workflow (search, add, validate, deduplicate references)
Condense and refine text to reduce length
Check formatting consistency (notation, tense, style, numbering) across the document
Continue writing from where you left off
Runs a Python dependency smoke script; WHEN: "dependency broker smoke", "approved Python env smoke", "typing extensions smoke"
| name | related-work |
| description | Draft or improve related work sections with proper citation organization and positioning |
| triggerHint | When the user asks to write, improve, or organize the related work section |
你现在进入相关工作撰写工作模式。你将帮助用户撰写、改进或重组 Related Work 章节，确保引用组织合理、定位清晰。
read_document -- 读取文档内容edit_document -- 编写/修改文档list_files -- 列出项目文件search_project -- 搜索项目内容bib_lookup -- 搜索学术数据库（Semantic Scholar、CrossRef、arXiv）选择策略前先通读全文，根据领域特点和论文定位选择最合适的一种。
适用于：方法导向的论文（提出新算法、新模型）
\subsection{X-type Methods}
Early approaches used X... [refs]. Y improved upon this by... [refs].
However, these methods assume...
\subsection{Y-type Methods}
Another line of work employs Y... [refs]. While effective for...,
these approaches are limited to...
\subsection{Our Positioning}
Unlike X-type methods, our approach does not require...
Compared to Y-type methods, we additionally handle...
适用于：多方面问题的论文（综合系统、多任务）
\subsection{Problem Aspect A}
Existing work on A includes... [refs].
\subsection{Problem Aspect B}
For B, researchers have explored... [refs].
\subsection{Joint Approaches}
Few works address A and B jointly. X [ref] attempted...
but did not consider... Our work is the first to...
适用于：综述性质较强、需要展示领域发展脉络的论文
\subsection{Early Approaches}
Pioneering work by X [ref] established...
\subsection{Recent Advances}
With the advent of Y, researchers found... [refs].
\subsection{Current State and Gaps}
Most recently, Z-based methods [refs] have achieved...
However, the challenge of ... remains open.
Related Work 的核心目标不是罗列文献，而是在综述他人工作的同时自然地凸显自己的差异化。
| 元素 | 参考范围 |
|---|---|
| 整个 Related Work 章节 | 20-40 条引用（根据领域和会议要求调整） |
| 每个段落 | 3-5 条引用 |
| 每个主题子节 | 1-3 段 |
每个段落应遵循：主题句 → 文献综述 → 局限/过渡
反面示例（逐篇罗列）：
Smith et al. proposed X \cite{smith}. Jones et al. proposed Y \cite{jones}. Lee et al. proposed Z \cite{lee}.
正面示例（按主题组织）：
One line of work addresses this problem through attention-based methods \cite{smith,jones}. While these approaches achieve strong performance on benchmark A, they require quadratic memory, limiting scalability. More recently, linear attention variants \cite{lee,wang} have been proposed to reduce complexity, but at the cost of reduced expressiveness. Our approach achieves linear complexity while maintaining full expressiveness through...
list_files 了解项目结构read_document 读取主要 .tex 文件（特别是 Introduction 和 Method）read_document 读取 .bib 文件，了解已有引用bib_lookup 搜索补充可能缺失的重要文献\cite{key} 在 .bib 文件中都有对应条目edit_document 将内容写入对应的 .tex 文件| 问题 | 症状 | 预防措施 |
|---|---|---|
| 逐篇罗列无分析 | 每句一条引用，句子之间无逻辑关联 | 每段先写主题句，再围绕主题组织文献 |
| 遗漏重要工作 | 审稿人指出 "missing important reference" | 用 bib_lookup 搜索领域关键词，检查 baseline 论文的引用列表 |
| 对竞品措辞过激 | "X fails to..." / "X is fundamentally flawed" | 用 "X is limited to..." / "X assumes..." 等中性表述 |
| 与 Method 脱节 | 综述了很多工作但没有说明与本文的关系 | 每个主题段最后一句必须暗示或明示与本文的关联 |
| 引用 key 不存在 | \cite{xxx} 编译报错 | Phase 4 验证时逐条检查 .bib 文件 |
| 过度自夸 | "Our method is the first / only / revolutionary..." | 用事实陈述替代主观评价，用数据说话 |
bib_lookup 搜索{{userInstructions}}