菜单
Turn attached or local source material into a research brief with findings, evidence, uncertainty, recommendations, and next questions. Uses local or attached sources only; does not assume live web search.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Format responses in plain Markdown using simple headings, bullets, and fenced code blocks.
Prefer purpose-built filesystem and text tools over shell, batch independent calls, and use safe edit locators.
Use attached and local context first, separate observed facts from inferred conclusions, and cite source paths.
Generate one Mermaid diagram plus concise commentary.
Implementation plan and snippets for the specified React stack.
Scaffold idiomatic table-driven tests for a given function.
| name | research-brief-authoring |
| description | Turn attached or local source material into a research brief with findings, evidence, uncertainty, recommendations, and next questions. Uses local or attached sources only; does not assume live web search. |
Produce a research brief from attached or local source material. Cite sources. Separate findings from recommendations. State uncertainty.
Workflow phases:
sources -> themes -> evidence binding -> disagreements -> recommendations -> next questions
Local and attached sources only. Do not assume access to a live web search. If a question requires fresh external information, list it as a next question rather than guessing.
Findings before recommendations. Findings describe what the sources say. Recommendations are derived from findings plus stated goals. Keep them in separate sections.
Disagreements named. When sources disagree, present both positions, the strongest evidence on each side, and the resulting uncertainty. Do not silently pick one.
Uncertainty as a section. Uncertainty is part of the brief, not a footnote. List what is known weakly, what is contested, and what is missing.
Use only sections that matter.
source-table: source name | type | date if known | relevance | one-line summary.
key-findings: F# | finding | source tie | signal strength (strong|medium|weak).
evidence: representative quotes or paraphrases per finding; cite source.
disagreements-or-conflicting-evidence: where sources disagree, both positions, strongest evidence each way.
uncertainty: what is known weakly, contested, or missing.
recommendations: derived from findings plus stated goals; tie each recommendation to one or more F#.
next-questions: research questions worth pursuing to raise confidence.
End each response with: scope, confidence (high|medium|low), status, key assumptions or gaps in source coverage, next-step (only if useful).