菜单
Systematic project plan review toolkit. Evaluate architecture decisions, building block specifications, sprint plans, cost estimates, risk assessments, and implementation feasibility for comprehensive project plan validation.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | plan-review |
| description | Systematic project plan review toolkit. Evaluate architecture decisions, building block specifications, sprint plans, cost estimates, risk assessments, and implementation feasibility for comprehensive project plan validation. |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Write","Edit","Bash"] |
Plan review is a systematic process for evaluating project plans and specifications. Assess architecture decisions, building blocks, sprint plans, cost estimates, risk assessments, and implementation roadmaps. Apply this skill to validate project plans before implementation begins.
This skill should be used when:
When creating review documents, consider adding diagrams to enhance communication.
Use the project-diagrams skill to generate:
python .claude/skills/project-diagrams/scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram description" -o diagrams/output.png
Conduct plan review systematically through the following stages.
Begin with a high-level evaluation to determine the plan's scope, completeness, and overall quality.
Key Questions:
Output: Brief summary (2-3 sentences) capturing the plan's essence and initial impression.
Evaluate the system architecture and technology decisions.
Evaluate each building block for completeness and buildability.
For each building block, verify:
Evaluate sprint plans for feasibility and INVEST criteria.
| Criterion | Question |
|---|---|
| Independent | Can this story be delivered without other stories? |
| Negotiable | Is the scope flexible based on feedback? |
| Valuable | Does it deliver value to users or stakeholders? |
| Estimable | Can effort be reasonably estimated? |
| Small | Can it be completed within a sprint? |
| Testable | Are acceptance criteria clear and testable? |
Evaluate cost estimates and financial projections.
Evaluate risk identification and mitigation strategies.
Verify these common risk categories are addressed:
| Category | Example Risks |
|---|---|
| Technical | Integration failures, scalability issues, technical debt |
| Security | Data breaches, authentication vulnerabilities |
| Resource | Key person dependency, skill gaps, turnover |
| External | Third-party API changes, regulatory changes |
| Business | Market changes, competitor actions, budget cuts |
| Timeline | Scope creep, dependency delays, underestimation |
Evaluate the implementation timeline.
Organize feedback in a hierarchical structure.
Provide a concise overall assessment (1-2 paragraphs):
List issues that must be resolved before implementation:
For each critical issue:
List important issues that should be addressed:
List improvements for plan quality:
List specific questions needing answers:
Maintain a constructive, professional tone throughout.
Best Practices:
Avoid:
Before finalizing the review, verify:
Strategic advisor for evaluating software/AI product ideas and generating defensible startup strategies. Use this skill whenever the user wants to evaluate a product idea, brainstorm startup directions, assess defensibility against foundation model companies, choose between build-vs-buy for AI components, or needs a strategic positioning check for a development project. Trigger on phrases like "is this idea defensible", "what should I build", "will OpenAI/Anthropic eat this", "startup idea", "product strategy", "moat", "competitive positioning", "should I build X", "vertical AI opportunity", "business model for AI", or any discussion about whether a software product is worth building given the current AI landscape. Also trigger when the user is evaluating technical architecture decisions through a strategic lens — e.g. "should I use a fine-tuned model or API calls" where the answer has competitive implications.
Component specification toolkit for breaking software projects into discrete, buildable blocks. Create detailed specifications with interfaces, dependencies, test criteria, and effort estimates for Claude Code to build incrementally.
Document toolkit (.docx). Create/edit documents, tracked changes, comments, formatting preservation, text extraction, for professional document processing.
PDF manipulation toolkit. Extract text/tables, create PDFs, merge/split, fill forms, for programmatic document processing and analysis.
Presentation toolkit (.pptx). Create/edit slides, layouts, content, speaker notes, comments, for programmatic presentation creation and modification.
Spreadsheet toolkit (.xlsx/.csv). Create/edit with formulas/formatting, analyze data, visualization, recalculate formulas, for spreadsheet processing and analysis.