| name | fosmvvm-serverrequest-generator |
| description | Generate FOSMVVM ServerRequest types for CRUD operations and client-server communication. Scaffolds requests, response bodies, and typed error handling. |
| homepage | https://github.com/foscomputerservices/FOSUtilities |
| metadata | {"clawdbot":{"emoji":"🔌","os":["darwin","linux"]}} |
FOSMVVM ServerRequest Generator
Generate ServerRequest types for client-server communication.
Architecture context: See FOSMVVMArchitecture.md | OpenClaw reference
API catalog: check ../shared/api-catalog/FOSMVVM.md § Protocols and ../shared/api-catalog/FOSFoundation.md § Coding, § Networking before hand-writing helpers.
STOP AND READ THIS
ServerRequest is THE way to communicate with an FOSMVVM server. No exceptions.
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ALL CLIENTS USE ServerRequest │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ iOS App: Button tap → request.processRequest(mvvmEnv:) │
│ macOS App: Button tap → request.processRequest(mvvmEnv:) │
│ WebApp: JS → WebApp → request.processRequest(mvvmEnv:) │
│ CLI Tool: main() → request.processRequest(mvvmEnv:) │
│ Data Collector: timer/event → request.processRequest(mvvmEnv:) │
│ Background Job: cron trigger → request.processRequest(mvvmEnv:) │
│ │
│ MVVMEnvironment holds: baseURL, headers, version, error handling │
│ Configure ONCE at startup, use EVERYWHERE via processRequest() │
│ │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
What You Must NEVER Do
let url = URL(string: "http://server/api/users/123")!
var request = URLRequest(url: url)
try await client.get("/api/users/\(id)")
let json = try JSONEncoder().encode(body)
request.httpBody = json
fetch('/api/users/123')
fetch(`/api/ideas/${ideaId}/move`)
What You Must ALWAYS Do
Step 1: Configure MVVMEnvironment once at startup
import ViewModels
let mvvmEnv = await MVVMEnvironment(
currentVersion: .currentApplicationVersion,
appBundle: Bundle.module,
deploymentURLs: [.debug: URL(string: "http://localhost:8080")!]
)
The shared module contains SystemVersion+App.swift:
public extension SystemVersion {
static var currentApplicationVersion: Self { .v1_0 }
static var v1_0: Self { .init(major: 1, minor: 0, patch: 0) }
}
Step 2: Use processRequest(mvvmEnv:) everywhere
let request = UserShowRequest(query: .init(userId: id))
try await request.processRequest(mvvmEnv: mvvmEnv)
let user = request.responseBody
let createRequest = IdeaCreateRequest(requestBody: .init(content: content))
try await createRequest.processRequest(mvvmEnv: mvvmEnv)
let newId = createRequest.responseBody?.id
let updateRequest = IdeaMoveRequest(requestBody: .init(ideaId: id, newStatus: status))
try await updateRequest.processRequest(mvvmEnv: mvvmEnv)
The path is derived from the type name. The HTTP method comes from the protocol. You NEVER write URL strings. Configuration lives in MVVMEnvironment - you NEVER pass baseURL/headers to individual requests.
When to Use This Skill
- Implementing any client-server communication
- Adding CRUD operations (Create, Read, Update, Delete)
- Building data collectors or sync tools
- Any Swift code that needs to talk to the server
If you're about to write URLRequest or a hardcoded path string, STOP and use this skill instead.
What ServerRequest Provides
| Concern | How ServerRequest Handles It |
|---|
| URL Path | Derived from type name via Self.path (e.g., IdeaMoveRequest → /idea_move) |
| HTTP Method | Determined by action.httpMethod (ShowRequest=GET, CreateRequest=POST, etc.) |
| Request Body | RequestBody type, automatically JSON encoded via requestBody?.toJSONData() |
| Response Body | ResponseBody type, automatically JSON decoded into responseBody |
| Error Response | ResponseError type, automatically decoded when response can't decode as ResponseBody |
| Validation | RequestBody: ValidatableModel for write operations |
| Body Size Limits | RequestBody.maxBodySize for large uploads (files, images) |
| Type Safety | Compiler enforces correct types throughout |
Request Protocol Selection
Choose based on the operation:
| Operation | Protocol | HTTP Method | RequestBody Required? |
|---|
| Read data | ShowRequest | GET | No |
| Read ViewModel | ViewModelRequest | GET | No |
| Create entity | CreateRequest | POST | Yes (ValidatableModel) |
| Update entity | UpdateRequest | PATCH | Yes (ValidatableModel) |
| Replace entity | (use .replace action) | PUT | Yes |
| Soft delete | DeleteRequest | DELETE | No |
| Hard delete | DestroyRequest | DELETE | No |
The left column is the protocol you conform to (CreateRequest, UpdateRequest, …).
That is NOT the name of your concrete type — see naming below.
Naming the Concrete Request Type
Concrete write/action requests are noun-first: <Noun><Verb>Request.
| Operation | ✅ Concrete type | ❌ Not |
|---|
| Create a User | UserCreateRequest | CreateUserRequest |
| Update a User | UserUpdateRequest | UpdateUserRequest |
| Replace a User (PUT) | UserReplaceRequest | ReplaceUserRequest |
| Delete a User | UserDeleteRequest | DeleteUserRequest |
| Semantic action | IdeaMoveRequest | MoveIdeaRequest |
| Raw-data read | UserShowRequest | — |
Noun-first keeps an entity's whole request family cohesive and sortable
(UserCreateRequest/UserDeleteRequest/UserShowRequest/UserUpdateRequest group
together) — an SRP win, and it matches the already-noun-first ShowRequest form.
ViewModel read requests drop the verb entirely (DocksRequest, not DocksShowRequest).
Full rules and rationale: Naming Dictionary.
What This Skill Generates
Core Files (Always)
| File | Location | Purpose |
|---|
{Action}Request.swift | {ViewModelsTarget}/Requests/ | The ServerRequest type |
{Action}Controller.swift | {WebServerTarget}/Controllers/ | Server-side handler |
Optional: WebApp Bridge (for web clients)
| File | Purpose |
|---|
| WebApp route | Bridges JS fetch to ServerRequest.fetch() |
| JS handler guidance | How to invoke from browser |
How to Use This Skill
Invocation:
/fosmvvm-serverrequest-generator
Prerequisites:
- Operation requirements understood from conversation context
- RequestBody and ResponseBody structures discussed or documented
- Client type identified (iOS app, WebApp, CLI tool, background job, etc.)
Workflow integration:
This skill is typically used when implementing client-server communication. The skill references conversation context automatically—no file paths or Q&A needed. Often follows fosmvvm-viewmodel-generator (for ResponseBody ViewModels) and fosmvvm-fields-generator (for RequestBody validation).
Pattern Implementation
This skill references conversation context to determine ServerRequest structure:
Operation Type Detection
From conversation context, the skill identifies:
- CRUD operation (create, read, update, delete)
- HTTP semantics (GET for read, POST for create, PATCH/PUT for update, DELETE for delete)
- Protocol choice (ShowRequest, ViewModelRequest, CreateRequest, UpdateRequest, DeleteRequest)
Request Structure Design
From requirements already in context:
- RequestBody fields (what data the client sends)
- Query parameters (URL query string data)
- Fragment parameters (URL fragment/anchor data)
- Validation requirements (ValidatableModel for write operations)
Response Structure Design
From requirements already in context:
- ResponseBody type (often a ViewModel, sometimes just an ID)
- ResponseError type (custom error structure or EmptyError)
- Success scenarios (what indicates successful operation)
- Error scenarios (known failure modes requiring structured errors)
Client Detection
From conversation context:
- Target platform (iOS/macOS app, WebApp browser, CLI tool, background job)
- Bridge requirements (whether WebApp route needed for browser clients)
- MVVMEnvironment setup (how client configures baseURL and headers)
File Generation
Core files:
- ServerRequest type with RequestBody, ResponseBody, ResponseError
- Controller with action handler
- Route registration
Optional (for WebApp clients):
4. WebApp route bridging JS to ServerRequest
5. JavaScript handler guidance
Context Sources
Skill references information from:
- Prior conversation: Operation requirements, data structures discussed
- Specification files: If Claude has read API specs or feature docs into context
- Existing patterns: From codebase analysis of similar requests
ServerRequest Type Template
import FOSMVVM
public final class {Action}Request: {Protocol}, @unchecked Sendable {
public typealias Query = EmptyQuery
public typealias Fragment = EmptyFragment
public let requestBody: RequestBody?
public var responseBody: ResponseBody?
public struct RequestBody: ServerRequestBody, ValidatableModel {
}
public struct ResponseBody: {Protocol}ResponseBody {
}
public init(
query: Query? = nil,
fragment: Fragment? = nil,
requestBody: RequestBody? = nil,
responseBody: ResponseBody? = nil
) {
self.requestBody = requestBody
self.responseBody = responseBody
}
}
Note: All subtypes (RequestBody, ResponseBody, ResponseError) are nested inside the request class. This avoids namespace pollution and provides unique YAML localization keys automatically.
Controller Template
Controller action = Protocol name (minus "Request")
| Protocol | Action | HTTP Method |
|---|
ShowRequest | .show | GET |
ViewModelRequest | .show | GET |
CreateRequest | .create | POST |
UpdateRequest | .update | PATCH |
DeleteRequest | .delete | DELETE |
DestroyRequest | .destroy | DELETE |
| Custom request | Whatever fits your semantics | Depends on action |
The pattern is mechanical: UpdateRequest → .update. CreateRequest → .create. Just match the names.
import Vapor
import FOSMVVM
import FOSMVVMVapor
final class {Action}Controller: ServerRequestController {
typealias TRequest = {Action}Request
let actions: [ServerRequestAction: ActionProcessor] = [
.{action}: {Action}Request.performAction
]
}
private extension {Action}Request {
static func performAction(
_ request: Vapor.Request,
_ serverRequest: {Action}Request,
_ requestBody: RequestBody
) async throws -> ResponseBody {
let db = request.db
return .init(...)
}
}
Controller Registration
try versionedGroup.register(collection: {Action}Controller())
Client Invocation
All Swift clients (iOS, macOS, CLI, background jobs, etc.):
let request = {Action}Request(requestBody: .init(...))
try await request.processRequest(mvvmEnv: mvvmEnv)
let result = request.responseBody
WebApp (browser clients):
See WebApp Bridge Pattern below.
WebApp Bridge Pattern
When the client is a web browser, you need a bridge between JavaScript and ServerRequest:
Browser WebApp (Swift) WebServer
│ │ │
│ POST /action-name │ │
│ (JSON body) │ │
│ ─────────────────────────► │ │
│ │ request.processRequest(mvvmEnv:)│
│ │ ────────────────────────────────►│
│ │ ◄────────────────────────────────│
│ ◄──────────────────────── │ (ResponseBody) │
│ (HTML fragment or JSON) │ │
The WebApp route is internal wiring - it's how browsers invoke ServerRequest, just like a button tap invokes it in iOS.
WebApp Route
app.post("{action-name}") { req async throws -> Response in
let body = try req.content.decode({Action}Request.RequestBody.self)
let serverRequest = {Action}Request(requestBody: body)
try await serverRequest.processRequest(mvvmEnv: req.application.mvvmEnv)
guard let response = serverRequest.responseBody else {
throw Abort(.internalServerError, reason: "No response from server")
}
}
JavaScript Handler
async function handle{Action}(data) {
const response = await fetch('/{action-name}', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
body: JSON.stringify(data)
});
}
Note: The JS fetches to the WebApp (same origin), which then uses ServerRequest to talk to the WebServer. The browser NEVER talks directly to the WebServer.
Common Patterns
ViewModel Response
Most operations return a ViewModel for UI update:
public struct ResponseBody: UpdateResponseBody {
public let viewModel: IdeaCardViewModel
}
ID-Only Response
Some operations just need confirmation:
public struct ResponseBody: CreateResponseBody {
public let id: ModelIdType
}
Empty Response
Delete operations often return nothing:
public typealias ResponseBody = EmptyBody
ResponseError - Typed Error Handling
Each ServerRequest can define a custom ResponseError type for structured error responses from the server.
How It Works
When processing a response:
- Framework tries to decode as
ResponseBody
- If that fails, tries to decode as
ResponseError
- If
ResponseError decode succeeds, that error is thrown
- Client catches with try/catch at the call site
When to Use Custom ResponseError
Use custom ResponseError when:
- Operation has known failure modes (validation, quota, permissions)
- Server returns structured error details (field names, error codes)
- Client needs to take specific action based on error type
- You want field-level validation error display
Use EmptyError (default) when:
- Operation rarely fails
- Failures are exceptional (network down, server crash)
- No structured error response expected
- You only need success/failure, not why
Nesting Pattern
ResponseError MUST be nested inside the request class, just like RequestBody and ResponseBody:
public final class IdeaCreateRequest: CreateRequest, @unchecked Sendable {
public typealias Query = EmptyQuery
public typealias Fragment = EmptyFragment
public let requestBody: RequestBody?
public var responseBody: ResponseBody?
public struct RequestBody: ServerRequestBody, ValidatableModel { ... }
public struct ResponseBody: CreateResponseBody { ... }
public struct ResponseError: ServerRequestError { ... }
public init(...) { ... }
}
Why nesting matters:
- Consistent with RequestBody/ResponseBody pattern
- Avoids namespace pollution (no
IdeaCreateError, IdeaMoveError, etc. at top level)
- YAML localization keys are scoped:
IdeaCreateRequest.ResponseError.ErrorCode.quotaExceeded
- No need for unique type names like
GovernanceLessonCreateError - nesting provides uniqueness
Pattern 1: Errors with Associated Values
For errors that need dynamic data in their messages, use LocalizableSubstitutions:
public final class IdeaCreateRequest: CreateRequest, @unchecked Sendable {
public struct ResponseError: ServerRequestError {
public let code: ErrorCode
public let message: LocalizableSubstitutions
public enum ErrorCode: Codable, Sendable {
case duplicateContent
case quotaExceeded(requestedSize: Int, maximumSize: Int)
case invalidCategory(category: String)
var message: LocalizableSubstitutions {
switch self {
case .duplicateContent:
.init(
baseString: .localized(for: Self.self, parentType: ResponseError.self, propertyName: "duplicateContent"),
substitutions: [:]
)
case .quotaExceeded(let requestedSize, let maximumSize):
.init(
baseString: .localized(for: Self.self, parentType: ResponseError.self, propertyName: "quotaExceeded"),
substitutions: [
"requestedSize": LocalizableInt(value: requestedSize),
"maximumSize": LocalizableInt(value: maximumSize)
]
)
case .invalidCategory(let category):
.init(
baseString: .localized(for: Self.self, parentType: ResponseError.self, propertyName: "invalidCategory"),
substitutions: [
"category": LocalizableString.constant(category)
]
)
}
}
}
public init(code: ErrorCode) {
self.code = code
self.message = code.message
}
}
}
en:
IdeaCreateRequest:
ResponseError:
ErrorCode:
duplicateContent: "The requested content is a duplicate of an existing idea."
quotaExceeded: "The requested content size %{requestedSize} exceeds the maximum allowed size %{maximumSize}."
invalidCategory: "The category %{category} is not valid."
Pattern 2: Simple Errors (String-Based Codes)
For simpler errors without associated values, use a String raw value enum:
public final class IdeaMoveRequest: UpdateRequest, @unchecked Sendable {
public struct ResponseError: ServerRequestError {
public let code: ErrorCode
public let message: LocalizableString
public enum ErrorCode: String, Codable, Sendable {
case ideaNotFound
case invalidTransition
var message: LocalizableString {
.localized(for: Self.self, parentType: ResponseError.self, propertyName: rawValue)
}
}
public init(code: ErrorCode) {
self.code = code
self.message = code.message
}
}
}
en:
IdeaMoveRequest:
ResponseError:
ErrorCode:
ideaNotFound: "The idea was not found"
invalidTransition: "Cannot move to the requested status"
Type Safety Means You Already Know
STOP. Before you panic about "how do I know what error type I have?"
This isn't JavaScript. The type system tells you everything at compile time:
let request = IdeaMoveRequest(requestBody: body)
do {
try await request.processRequest(mvvmEnv: mvvmEnv)
} catch let error as IdeaMoveRequest.ResponseError {
}
The anti-pattern (JavaScript brain):
catch let error as ServerRequestError {
}
The pattern (Swift brain):
catch let error as IdeaMoveRequest.ResponseError {
switch error.code {
case .ideaNotFound:
case .invalidTransition:
}
}
The ServerRequestError protocol is a marker (Error, Codable, Sendable). It doesn't guarantee properties because it doesn't need to - you catch the concrete type, not the protocol.
Client Error Handling
The primary pattern is try/catch at the call site:
do {
try await request.processRequest(mvvmEnv: mvvmEnv)
} catch let error as IdeaCreateError {
switch error.code {
case .duplicateContent:
showDuplicateWarning(message: error.message)
case .quotaExceeded(let requestedSize, let maximumSize):
showQuotaError(requested: requestedSize, maximum: maximumSize, message: error.message)
case .invalidCategory(let category):
highlightInvalidCategory(category, message: error.message)
}
} catch {
showGenericError(error)
}
Built-in ValidationError
FOSMVVM provides ValidationError for field-level validation failures:
let validations = Validations()
if requestBody.email.isEmpty {
validations.validations.append(.init(
status: .error,
fieldId: "email",
message: .localized(for: UserCreateRequest.self, propertyName: "emailRequired")
))
}
if let error = validations.validationError {
throw error
}
catch let error as ValidationError {
for validation in error.validations {
for message in validation.messages {
for fieldId in message.fieldIds {
formFields[fieldId]?.showError(message.message)
}
}
}
}
Architecture context: See ServerRequestError - Typed Error Responses for full details.
Testing ServerRequests
Always test via ServerRequest.processRequest(mvvmEnv:) - never via manual HTTP.
See fosmvvm-serverrequest-test-generator for complete testing guidance.
let request = {Entity}UpdateRequest(
query: .init(entityId: id),
requestBody: .init(name: "New Name")
)
try await request.processRequest(mvvmEnv: testMvvmEnv)
#expect(request.responseBody?.viewModel.name == "New Name")
try await app.sendRequest(.PATCH, "/entity/\(id)", body: json)
See Also
Version History
| Version | Date | Changes |
|---|
| 1.0 | 2025-12-24 | Initial Kairos-specific skill |
| 2.0 | 2025-12-26 | Complete rewrite: top-down architecture focus, "ServerRequest Is THE Way" principle, generalized from Kairos, WebApp bridge as platform pattern |
| 2.1 | 2025-12-27 | MVVMEnvironment is THE configuration holder for all clients (CLI, iOS, macOS, etc.) - not raw baseURL/headers. DRY principle enforcement. |
| 2.2 | 2025-12-27 | Added shared module pattern - SystemVersion.currentApplicationVersion from shared module, reference to FOSMVVMArchitecture.md |
| 2.3 | 2025-12-27 | Added ServerRequestBodySize for large upload body size limits (maxBodySize on RequestBody) |
| 2.4 | 2026-01-08 | Added controller action mapping table, testing section with reference to test generator skill |
| 2.5 | 2026-01-08 | Simplified action mapping: "action = protocol name minus Request". Removed drama, just state the pattern. |
| 2.6 | 2026-01-09 | Added ResponseError section with two patterns: associated values (LocalizableSubstitutions) and simple string codes (LocalizableString). Added YAML examples and built-in ValidationError usage. |
| 2.7 | 2026-01-20 | ResponseError MUST be nested inside request class (like RequestBody/ResponseBody). Updated patterns to show nesting with correct YAML key paths. |
| 2.8 | 2026-01-20 | Added "Type Safety Means You Already Know" section - explicit mental model that Swift's type system means you catch concrete error types, not protocols. Prevents JavaScript-brain panic about runtime type discovery. |
| 2.9 | 2026-01-24 | Update to context-aware approach (remove file-parsing/Q&A). Skill references conversation context instead of asking questions or accepting file paths. |
| 2.10 | 2026-07-02 | Concrete request types are noun-first (<Noun><Verb>Request); added "Naming the Concrete Request Type" section + Naming Dictionary cross-ref; flipped all verb-first examples (CreateIdeaRequest→IdeaCreateRequest, MoveIdeaRequest→IdeaMoveRequest, etc.). (backlog A1) |