一键导入
fosmvvm-swiftui-view-generator
Generate SwiftUI views that render FOSMVVM ViewModels. Scaffolds ViewModelView pattern with binding, loading states, and previews.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Generate SwiftUI views that render FOSMVVM ViewModels. Scaffolds ViewModelView pattern with binding, loading states, and previews.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Discover FOSUtilities APIs before writing helper code. Use when reaching for JSON/Codable encoding-decoding, wire-format date formatting, URLSession/HTTP fetching, WebSockets, network mocking in tests, collection grouping or throttled iteration, string casing/hashing/obfuscation/CSV parsing, hex or rounded-number formatting, semantic version comparison, semaphores or async-from-sync bridging, typed model identifiers, runtime environment/bundle-version checks (simulator/TestFlight detection), ViewModel declaration and localization, form fields and validation, ServerRequests/CRUD, SwiftUI ViewModel binding, Vapor boot wiring/routes/Fluent/Leaf/middleware, ViewModel or ServerRequest or UI testing, or PDF generation — in any project that imports FOSFoundation, FOSMVVM, FOSMVVMVapor, FOSTesting, or FOSReporting.
Update the FOSUtilities API catalog after API changes. Runs the symbol-graph audit, fixes stale entries, writes curated entries for gaps, maintains the reach-for index, and bumps the plugin version. Use in the FOSUtilities repo when CI's catalog audit warns/fails, after adding or renaming public API, or when a reach-for index line is missing.
Generate FOSMVVM Fields protocols with validation rules, FormField definitions, and localized messages. Define form contracts once, validate everywhere.
Generate Fluent DataModels for FOSMVVM server-side persistence. Scaffolds models, migrations, and tests for database-backed entities.
Generate Leaf templates for FOSMVVM WebApps. Create full-page views and HTML-over-the-wire fragments that render ViewModels.
Plan FOSMVVM implementation work with a design-first, DocC-first gate. Use BEFORE writing an implementation plan that adds or changes FOSMVVM types, protocols, ViewModels, requests, identities, or persistence — it applies FOSMVVM's design and documentation discipline up front, then hands task decomposition to your generic plan process.
| name | fosmvvm-swiftui-view-generator |
| description | Generate SwiftUI views that render FOSMVVM ViewModels. Scaffolds ViewModelView pattern with binding, loading states, and previews. |
| homepage | https://github.com/foscomputerservices/FOSUtilities |
| metadata | {"clawdbot":{"emoji":"📱","os":["darwin"]}} |
Generate SwiftUI views that render FOSMVVM ViewModels.
For full architecture context, see FOSMVVMArchitecture.md | OpenClaw reference
API catalog: check
../shared/api-catalog/FOSMVVM.md§ SwiftUI Support before hand-writing helpers.
In FOSMVVM, Views are thin rendering layers that display ViewModels:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ViewModelView Pattern │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ViewModel (Data) ViewModelView (SwiftUI) │
│ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ │
│ │ title: String │────►│ Text(vm.title) │ │
│ │ items: [Item] │────►│ ForEach(vm.items)│ │
│ │ isEnabled: Bool │────►│ .disabled(!...) │ │
│ └──────────────────┘ └──────────────────┘ │
│ │
│ Operations (Actions) │
│ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ │
│ │ submit() │◄────│ Button(action:) │ │
│ │ cancel() │◄────│ .onAppear { } │ │
│ └──────────────────┘ └──────────────────┘ │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Key principle: Views don't transform or compute data. They render what the ViewModel provides.
The View filename should match the ViewModel it renders.
Sources/
{ViewModelsTarget}/
{Feature}/
{Feature}ViewModel.swift ←──┐
{Entity}CardViewModel.swift ←──┼── Same names
│
{ViewsTarget}/ │
{Feature}/ │
{Feature}View.swift ────┤ (renders {Feature}ViewModel)
{Entity}CardView.swift ────┘ (renders {Entity}CardViewModel)
This alignment provides:
Every view conforms to ViewModelView:
public struct MyView: ViewModelView {
private let viewModel: MyViewModel
public var body: some View {
Text(viewModel.title)
}
public init(viewModel: MyViewModel) {
self.viewModel = viewModel
}
}
Required:
private let viewModel: {ViewModel}public init(viewModel:)ViewModelView protocolDisplay-only views skip this entire section. A View whose ViewModel has no
operationsproperty is display-only by definition — no Operations files exist on either side of the seam, norepaintToggle, notestDataTransporter. Do not invent an empty Operations protocol for symmetry; absence of operations is the signal that the View is display-only. (See "View Categories" below for the full distinction.)
An Operations protocol is the framework-side analog of ServerRequest: a contract the View calls into without knowing who satisfies it. Three files participate, on two sides of the seam:
| File | Side | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
<Name>Operations.swift | Framework (shared module) | The protocol — what actions the View can dispatch |
<Name>StubOps.swift | Framework (shared module) | Stub implementation — used in previews and LocalizableTestCase-driven tests |
<Name>Ops.swift | App target (implementation side) | Live implementation — orchestrates services, writes to storage, dispatches ServerRequests |
For a feature LandingPage, these live at:
Sources/ViewModels/Operations/LandingPage/LandingPageOperations.swiftSources/ViewModels/Operations/LandingPage/LandingPageStubOps.swiftSources/{AppTarget}/Operations/LandingPage/LandingPageOps.swiftThe View imports only the framework side and is unaware of which implementation runs. App Intents, lock-screen transport actions, and other non-View entry points dispatch through the same Operations protocol — the View is one entry point of several, not the owner of the action vocabulary.
Two protocol layers to keep distinct:
FOSMVVM.ViewModelOperations — the framework's base protocol. Every per-feature operations protocol conforms to it.<Name>ViewModelOperations (e.g., LandingPageViewModelOperations) — your project's per-feature protocol; conforms to FOSMVVM.ViewModelOperations and lists the actions the View dispatches.any at op method signaturesPer the architecture rule (no existentials at architectural boundaries), Operations method signatures take Fields conformers as generic parameters, not any:
// ✅ GOOD — generic specialization preserves the concrete type for the live op.
protocol ConversationOperations: ViewModelOperations {
func create<F: ConversationFields>(from fields: F) async throws
}
// ❌ BAD — `any` erases the concrete type and pulls existentials through the call graph.
protocol ConversationOperations: ViewModelOperations {
func create(from fields: any ConversationFields) async throws
}
Storage is a separate decision from method signatures. The View's operations property is typed as any <Name>ViewModelOperations — that's required, since Apple's API forces a concrete View struct shape and the View has to store the value somehow. This is the exception arch.md §1.5 explicitly carves out for "structural requirements that leave no alternative."
Crucially, any at storage does not infect the protocol's method signatures. Swift 5.7+ opens the existential implicitly at each call site, so a generic method called on an any P value still specializes to a concrete type at the call site:
private let operations: any ConversationOperations // ← `any` at storage is fine
private func submit() async throws {
try await operations.create(from: fields) // ← F inferred concretely
}
The rule to internalize: any is acceptable at single-value storage sites; generics are required at protocol method signatures. The architecture's anti-existential pressure is about preventing erasure from compounding through the call graph — and a stored any P does not compound, because each method call re-specializes.
Interactive views have operations:
public struct MyView: ViewModelView {
private let viewModel: MyViewModel
private let operations: any MyViewModelOperations
#if DEBUG
@State private var repaintToggle = false
#endif
public var body: some View {
Button(action: performAction) {
Text(viewModel.buttonLabel)
}
#if DEBUG
.testDataTransporter(viewModelOps: operations, repaintToggle: $repaintToggle)
#endif
}
public init(viewModel: MyViewModel) {
self.viewModel = viewModel
self.operations = viewModel.operations
}
private func performAction() {
operations.performAction()
toggleRepaint()
}
private func toggleRepaint() {
#if DEBUG
repaintToggle.toggle()
#endif
}
}
When views have operations:
operations from viewModel.operations in init@State private var repaintToggle = false (DEBUG only).testDataTransporter(viewModelOps:repaintToggle:) modifier (DEBUG only)toggleRepaint() after every operation invocationWhy toggleRepaint() exists. Client-hosted ops mutate @Observable storage that test harnesses (and occasionally SwiftUI itself) don't always re-observe in time for the next assertion. Toggling a @State flag forces a deterministic re-render at the View boundary, so UI tests see the post-op state instead of the pre-op state. In production builds the toggle is compiled out — it costs nothing at runtime.
Async vs sync op shape. Server-backed ops are typically async (try await operations.performAction()) and pair with Button(errorBinding:asyncAction:) / .task(errorBinding:) / .onAsyncSubmit. Client-hosted scalar-mutation ops are typically sync — the live op writes a property on @Observable storage and returns. Don't add async to an op method that doesn't need it; don't omit async on one that calls a ServerRequest.
The example above shows a server-backed op — operations.performAction() dispatches a ServerRequest. For client-hosted ops (those that mutate local @Observable storage), the call site shape is different — the View must inject storage from the environment and hand it to the op explicitly. See below.
@Environment Injection and output: at the Call SiteApplies when the ViewModel is client-hosted and its operations mutate one or more @Observable storage objects (e.g., UserSettings, DeviceState). Server-backed operations use the plain pattern shown in section 2.
Client-hosted ops take their write target as a trailing output storage: parameter. The ViewModel does not hold a reference to storage (see Architecture Patterns → VMs Hold Scalars); the View reads storage from @Environment and hands the reference to the op at the call site.
public struct PreferencesView: ViewModelView {
// The reference to the @Observable lives on the View, not the ViewModel.
@Environment(UserSettings.self) private var settings
private let viewModel: PreferencesViewModel
// Stored as `any` — required at View storage, see §2 "Generic over `any`".
// The protocol's *method signatures* remain generic; existential opening
// re-specializes at each call site.
private let operations: any PreferencesViewModelOperations
#if DEBUG
@State private var repaintToggle = false
#endif
public var body: some View {
VStack {
Toggle(
viewModel.notificationsLabel,
isOn: Binding(
get: { viewModel.notificationsEnabled },
set: { setNotifications($0) }
)
)
Picker(viewModel.themeLabel, selection: Binding(
get: { viewModel.theme },
set: { setTheme($0) }
)) {
// ... options
}
}
#if DEBUG
.testDataTransporter(viewModelOps: operations, repaintToggle: $repaintToggle)
#endif
}
public init(viewModel: PreferencesViewModel) {
self.viewModel = viewModel
self.operations = viewModel.operations
}
private func setNotifications(_ enabled: Bool) {
// Hand the reference from @Environment to the op at the call site.
operations.setNotificationsEnabled(enabled, output: settings)
toggleRepaint()
}
private func setTheme(_ theme: Theme) {
operations.setTheme(theme, output: settings)
toggleRepaint()
}
private func toggleRepaint() {
#if DEBUG
repaintToggle.toggle()
#endif
}
}
The mental model:
@Environment(UserSettings.self) puts the reference on the View.viewModel.notificationsEnabled: Bool, viewModel.theme: Theme), projected from settings by the parent's .bind(appState: .init(...)) call. The VM never holds the UserSettings reference.settings from its own @Environment and passes it to the op as output: settings. The reference never crosses the VM boundary.Common mistakes to avoid:
| Anti-pattern | Why it's wrong |
|---|---|
@State private var settings = UserSettings() on the view | View should read storage from @Environment, not own it |
viewModel.settings = ... | VMs never hold @Observable references (rule 4 of Forward Projection) |
operations.setTheme(.dark) (no output:) | Mutation has no target — the op can't write anywhere |
operations.setTheme(.dark, in: settings) | in reads like input; output is the correct label (conflation anti-pattern) |
Reading settings.theme in this View's body for display | Display reads belong on the VM scalar (viewModel.theme); env reads break projection |
Full rationale — why the VM holds scalars, why the reference flows through the call site rather than the VM, what breaks otherwise — lives in Architecture Patterns → Ops Conventions and Architecture Patterns → The Four Rules of Forward Projection.
Parent views bind child views using .bind(appState:):
public struct ParentView: ViewModelView {
@Environment(AppState.self) private var appState
private let viewModel: ParentViewModel
public var body: some View {
VStack {
Text(viewModel.title)
// Bind child view with subset of parent's data
ChildView.bind(
appState: .init(
itemId: viewModel.selectedId,
isConnected: viewModel.isConnected
)
)
}
}
}
The .bind() pattern:
.bind(appState:) to receive data from parentAppState from its own ViewModel dataForms use FormFieldView and Validations environment:
public struct MyFormView: ViewModelView {
@Environment(Validations.self) private var validations
@Environment(\.focusState) private var focusField
@State private var error: Error?
private let viewModel: MyFormViewModel
private let operations: any MyFormViewModelOperations
public var body: some View {
Form {
FormFieldView(
fieldModel: viewModel.$email,
focusField: focusField,
fieldValidator: viewModel.validateEmail,
validations: validations
)
Button(errorBinding: $error, asyncAction: submit) {
Text(viewModel.submitButtonLabel)
}
.disabled(validations.hasError)
}
.onAsyncSubmit {
await submit()
}
.alert(
errorBinding: $error,
title: viewModel.errorTitle,
message: viewModel.errorMessage,
dismissButtonLabel: viewModel.dismissButtonLabel
)
}
}
Form patterns:
@Environment(Validations.self) for validation stateFormFieldView for each input fieldButton(errorBinding:asyncAction:) for async actions.disabled(validations.hasError) on submit buttonUse .previewHost() for SwiftUI previews:
#if DEBUG
#Preview {
MyView.previewHost(
bundle: MyAppResourceAccess.localizationBundle
)
.environment(AppState())
}
#Preview("With Data") {
MyView.previewHost(
bundle: MyAppResourceAccess.localizationBundle,
viewModel: .stub(title: "Preview Title")
)
.environment(AppState())
}
#endif
The first decision when generating a View is interactive vs. display-only — and that decision is forced by the ViewModel, not chosen by the View author.
ViewModel has operations property? | View kind | Operations files |
|---|---|---|
| No | Display-only | None — do not create empty Operations protocol/Stub/Live files |
| Yes | Interactive (server-backed or client-hosted) | <Name>Operations.swift + <Name>StubOps.swift (framework side) + <Name>Ops.swift (app side) |
Absence of operations is a positive signal that the View originates no actions. Inventing an empty Operations protocol "for symmetry" is an anti-pattern (arch.md §3.4).
Views that just render data (no user interactions):
public struct InfoView: ViewModelView {
private let viewModel: InfoViewModel
public var body: some View {
VStack {
Text(viewModel.title)
Text(viewModel.description)
if viewModel.isActive {
Text(viewModel.activeStatusLabel)
}
}
}
public init(viewModel: InfoViewModel) {
self.viewModel = viewModel
}
}
Characteristics:
operations propertyrepaintToggle or testDataTransporterViews with user actions:
public struct ActionView: ViewModelView {
@State private var error: Error?
private let viewModel: ActionViewModel
private let operations: any ActionViewModelOperations
#if DEBUG
@State private var repaintToggle = false
#endif
public var body: some View {
VStack {
Button(action: performAction) {
Text(viewModel.actionLabel)
}
Button(role: .cancel, action: cancel) {
Text(viewModel.cancelLabel)
}
}
.alert(
errorBinding: $error,
title: viewModel.errorTitle,
message: viewModel.errorMessage,
dismissButtonLabel: viewModel.dismissButtonLabel
)
#if DEBUG
.testDataTransporter(viewModelOps: operations, repaintToggle: $repaintToggle)
#endif
}
public init(viewModel: ActionViewModel) {
self.viewModel = viewModel
self.operations = viewModel.operations
}
private func performAction() {
operations.performAction()
toggleRepaint()
}
private func cancel() {
operations.cancel()
toggleRepaint()
}
private func toggleRepaint() {
#if DEBUG
repaintToggle.toggle()
#endif
}
}
Views with validated input fields:
FormFieldView for each input@Environment(Validations.self) for validation statevalidations.hasErrorViews that compose child views:
public struct ContainerView: ViewModelView {
@Environment(AppState.self) private var appState
private let viewModel: ContainerViewModel
private let operations: any ContainerViewModelOperations
public var body: some View {
VStack {
switch viewModel.state {
case .loading:
ProgressView()
case .ready:
ChildAView.bind(
appState: .init(id: viewModel.selectedId)
)
ChildBView.bind(
appState: .init(
isActive: viewModel.isActive,
level: viewModel.level
)
)
}
}
}
}
| File | Location | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
{ViewName}View.swift | Sources/{ViewsTarget}/{Feature}/ | The SwiftUI view |
Note: The corresponding ViewModel and ViewModelOperations should already exist (use fosmvvm-viewmodel-generator skill).
| Placeholder | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
{ViewName} | View name (without "View" suffix) | TaskList, SignIn |
{ViewsTarget} | SwiftUI views SPM target | MyAppViews |
{Feature} | Feature/module grouping | Tasks, Auth |
This skill references conversation context to determine view structure:
From conversation context, the skill identifies:
Based on view type:
.bind() callsGenerates view file with:
ViewModelView protocol conformanceSkill references information from:
@State private var error: Error?
var body: some View {
VStack {
Button(errorBinding: $error, asyncAction: submit) {
Text(viewModel.submitLabel)
}
}
.alert(
errorBinding: $error,
title: viewModel.errorTitle,
message: viewModel.errorMessage,
dismissButtonLabel: viewModel.dismissButtonLabel
)
}
private func submit() async {
do {
try await operations.submit()
} catch {
self.error = error
}
toggleRepaint()
}
For forms, handle validation errors separately:
private func submit() async {
let validations = validations
do {
try await operations.submit(data: viewModel.data)
} catch let error as MyRequest.ResponseError {
if !error.validationResults.isEmpty {
validations.replace(with: error.validationResults)
} else {
self.error = error
}
} catch {
self.error = error
}
toggleRepaint()
}
var body: some View {
VStack {
if isLoading {
ProgressView()
} else {
contentView
}
}
.task(errorBinding: $error) {
try await loadData()
}
}
private func loadData() async throws {
isLoading = true
try await operations.loadData()
isLoading = false
toggleRepaint()
}
Use ViewModel state for conditionals:
var body: some View {
VStack {
if viewModel.isEmpty {
Text(viewModel.emptyStateMessage)
} else {
ForEach(viewModel.items) { item in
ItemRow(item: item)
}
}
}
}
Extract reusable view fragments as computed properties:
private var headerView: some View {
HStack {
Text(viewModel.title)
Spacer()
Image(systemName: viewModel.iconName)
}
}
var body: some View {
VStack {
headerView
contentView
}
}
When a view needs to render multiple possible ViewModels (success, various error types), use an enum wrapper:
The Wrapper ViewModel:
@ViewModel
public struct TaskResultViewModel {
public enum Result {
case success(TaskViewModel)
case notFound(NotFoundViewModel)
case validationError(ValidationErrorViewModel)
case permissionDenied(PermissionDeniedViewModel)
}
public let result: Result
public var vmId: ViewModelId = .init(type: Self.self)
public init(result: Result) {
self.result = result
}
}
The View:
public struct TaskResultView: ViewModelView {
private let viewModel: TaskResultViewModel
public var body: some View {
switch viewModel.result {
case .success(let vm):
TaskView(viewModel: vm)
case .notFound(let vm):
NotFoundView(viewModel: vm)
case .validationError(let vm):
ValidationErrorView(viewModel: vm)
case .permissionDenied(let vm):
PermissionDeniedView(viewModel: vm)
}
}
public init(viewModel: TaskResultViewModel) {
self.viewModel = viewModel
}
}
Key principles:
any ViewModel existentials)IMPORTANT: ViewModelId controls SwiftUI's view identity system via the .id(vmId) modifier. Incorrect initialization causes SwiftUI to treat different data as the same view, breaking updates.
❌ WRONG - Never use this:
public var vmId: ViewModelId = .init() // NO! Generic identity
✅ MINIMUM - Use type-based identity:
public var vmId: ViewModelId = .init(type: Self.self)
This ensures views of the same type get unique identities.
✅ IDEAL - Use data-based identity when available:
public struct TaskViewModel {
public let id: ModelIdType
public var vmId: ViewModelId
public init(id: ModelIdType, /* other params */) {
self.id = id
self.vmId = .init(id: id) // Ties view identity to data identity
// ...
}
}
Why this matters:
.id() modifier to determine when to recreate vs update viewsvmId provides this identity for ViewModelViews.init(id:)) is best because it ties view lifecycle to data lifecycleSources/{ViewsTarget}/
├── {Feature}/
│ ├── {Feature}View.swift # Full page → {Feature}ViewModel
│ ├── {Entity}CardView.swift # Child component → {Entity}CardViewModel
│ ├── {Entity}RowView.swift # Child component → {Entity}RowViewModel
│ └── {Modal}View.swift # Modal → {Modal}ViewModel
├── Shared/
│ ├── HeaderView.swift # Shared components
│ └── FooterView.swift
└── Styles/
└── ButtonStyles.swift # Reusable button styles
// ❌ BAD - View is transforming data
var body: some View {
Text("\(viewModel.firstName) \(viewModel.lastName)")
}
// ✅ GOOD - ViewModel provides shaped result
var body: some View {
Text(viewModel.fullName) // via @LocalizedCompoundString
}
// ❌ BAD - Test infrastructure won't work
private func submit() {
operations.submit()
// Missing toggleRepaint()!
}
// ✅ GOOD - Always call after operations
private func submit() {
operations.submit()
toggleRepaint()
}
// ❌ BAD - View is computing
var body: some View {
if !viewModel.items.isEmpty {
Text("You have \(viewModel.items.count) items")
}
}
// ✅ GOOD - ViewModel provides the state
var body: some View {
if viewModel.hasItems {
Text(viewModel.itemCountMessage)
}
}
// ❌ BAD - Not localizable
Button(action: submit) {
Text("Submit")
}
// ✅ GOOD - ViewModel provides localized text
Button(action: submit) {
Text(viewModel.submitButtonLabel)
}
// ❌ BAD - Errors not handled
Button(action: submit) {
Text(viewModel.submitLabel)
}
// ✅ GOOD - Error binding for async actions
Button(errorBinding: $error, asyncAction: submit) {
Text(viewModel.submitLabel)
}
// ❌ BAD - Recomputed on every render
public var body: some View {
let operations = viewModel.operations
Button(action: { operations.submit() }) {
Text(viewModel.submitLabel)
}
}
// ✅ GOOD - Store in init
private let operations: any MyOperations
public init(viewModel: MyViewModel) {
self.viewModel = viewModel
self.operations = viewModel.operations
}
// ❌ BAD - Filename doesn't match ViewModel
ViewModel: TaskListViewModel
View: TasksView.swift
// ✅ GOOD - Aligned names
ViewModel: TaskListViewModel
View: TaskListView.swift
// ❌ BAD - Generic identity, views won't update correctly
public var vmId: ViewModelId = .init()
// ✅ MINIMUM - Type-based identity
public var vmId: ViewModelId = .init(type: Self.self)
// ✅ IDEAL - Data-based identity (when id available)
public init(id: ModelIdType) {
self.id = id
self.vmId = .init(id: id)
}
// ❌ BAD - Force-unwrapping to work around missing overload
import SwiftUI
Text(try! viewModel.title.localizedString) // Anti-pattern - don't do this!
Label(try! viewModel.label.localizedString, systemImage: "star")
// ✅ GOOD - Request the proper SwiftUI overload instead
// The correct solution is to add an init extension like this:
extension Text {
public init(_ localizable: Localizable) {
self.init(localizable.localized)
}
}
extension Label where Title == Text, Icon == Image {
public init(_ title: Localizable, systemImage: String) {
self.init(title.localized, systemImage: systemImage)
}
}
// Then views use it cleanly without force-unwraps:
Text(viewModel.title)
Label(viewModel.label, systemImage: "star")
Why this matters:
FOSMVVM provides the Localizable protocol for all localized strings and includes SwiftUI init overloads for common elements like Text. However, not every SwiftUI element has a Localizable overload yet.
When you encounter a SwiftUI element that doesn't accept Localizable directly:
try! localizable.localizedString - this bypasses the type system and spreads force-unwrap calls throughout the view codeLocalizable and pass .localized to the standard initializerThis approach keeps the codebase clean, type-safe, and eliminates force-unwraps from view code entirely.
See reference.md for complete file templates.
| Concept | Convention | Example |
|---|---|---|
| View struct | {Name}View | TaskListView, SignInView |
| ViewModel property | viewModel | Always viewModel |
| Operations property | operations | Always operations |
| Error state | error | Always error |
| Repaint toggle | repaintToggle | Always repaintToggle |
// Error alert with ViewModel strings
.alert(
errorBinding: $error,
title: viewModel.errorTitle,
message: viewModel.errorMessage,
dismissButtonLabel: viewModel.dismissButtonLabel
)
// Async task with error handling
.task(errorBinding: $error) {
try await loadData()
}
// Async submit handler
.onAsyncSubmit {
await submit()
}
// Test data transporter (DEBUG only)
.testDataTransporter(viewModelOps: operations, repaintToggle: $repaintToggle)
// UI testing identifier
.uiTestingIdentifier("submitButton")
Apply standard modifiers as needed for layout, styling, etc.
Invocation:
/fosmvvm-swiftui-view-generator
Prerequisites:
Output:
{ViewName}View.swift - SwiftUI view conforming to ViewModelView protocolWorkflow integration: This skill is typically used after discussing requirements or reading specification files. The skill references that context automatically—no file paths or Q&A needed.
| Version | Date | Changes |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 2026-01-23 | Initial skill for SwiftUI view generation |
| 1.1 | 2026-05-03 | Operations section rewrite to align with ConversationPractice/docs/architecture.md: surface the framework/app-side seam (<Name>Operations.swift / <Name>StubOps.swift / <Name>Ops.swift file convention), distinguish FOSMVVM.ViewModelOperations from per-feature protocols, note App Intents/transport actions share the same protocol, document toggleRepaint() motivation, clarify async vs sync op shape, promote display-only-no-Operations decision to a top-level rule. Clarify the storage-vs-method-signature distinction: any is acceptable at single-value View storage (Swift 5.7+ implicit existential opening preserves generic specialization at call sites); generics are required at protocol method signatures. All View examples updated to private let operations: any <Name>ViewModelOperations. |