decision-mapping
Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
Use when creating, designing, writing, implementing, auditing, reviewing, improving, or optimizing conversion-focused landing pages, including PPC, lead generation, SaaS, ecommerce offer, signup, demo, trial, download, local-service, and campaign pages.
Use when something is broken, failing, slow, throwing, flaky, or behaving unexpectedly.
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
Anti-AI-slop design skill for greenfield pages, audits, redesigns, and design extraction from URLs or screenshots. Use when the user asks to build a new app or landing page, wants to redesign something, invokes Hallmark by name, or uses audit/redesign/study.
7-phase High-Level Design framework: clarify requirements, estimate scale, design components, model data, define APIs, deep dive on bottlenecks, and enumerate failure modes. Use for any system design question or production architecture task.
| name | decision-mapping |
| description | Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
This skill is invoked when a loose idea requires more than one agent session to turn into a plan. It creates a stateful decision map in a markdown file, and drives the user through a sequence of tickets to resolve the open questions - which may require either prototyping, research or discussion.
The decision map is a single compact Markdown file, one per planning effort, git-tracked alongside the project. It is the canonical artifact — the whole map is loaded as context into every session, so it must stay compact.
Assets created during tickets should be linked to from the map, not duplicated within it.
Numbered entries ("tickets"), each its own section keyed by its number:
## #1: Relational Or Non-Relational Database?
Blocked by: #<ticket-number>, #<ticket-number>
Type: Research | Prototype | Grilling
### Question
<question-here>
### Answer
<answer-here>
Each ticket must be sized to one 100K token agent session.
There are three types of tickets:
The map is deliberately incomplete beyond the frontier. Your job is to investigate the frontier, and to resolve tickets in order to push the frontier forward. Push back the fog of war, one node at a time.
At some point, the fog of war should have been pushed back far enough that the path to the finish line is clear. At that point, no more tickets will be required and the decision map can be considered 'done'.
There are two ways this skill can be invoked: bootstrap and resume.
User invokes with a loose idea.
User invokes with a path to an existing map and a ticket number.
/grilling and /domain-modeling.blocked_by edges).If the decisions made invalidate other parts of the map, update or delete those nodes.
The user may choose to run tickets in parallel, so expect other agents to make changes to the map.
Many times, the initial grilling will result in no fog of war. No unresolved tickets. Nothing to do, except implement.
In those situations, you should offer the user the chance to skip the decision map - since the decision map is only needed if multi-session decisions need to be made.
If they skip it, you should recommend either implementing directly or using /to-spec to schedule a multi-session implementation.