一键导入
model-card
Generate a model card covering overview, intended use, evals, limitations, governance, and versioning
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Generate a model card covering overview, intended use, evals, limitations, governance, and versioning
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Audit a Google ADK tool file against the five known gotchas (DI params, thin wrappers, _j helper, async-wrap blocking calls, httpx context manager) before they bite in production
After creating an ADR, run the cross-referencing checklist — update README Artifacts table, add Related Decisions section to source proposal, cross-link sibling ADRs to each other
Mid-task durability — dump current state and a next-step file before context fills, so the next session resumes without re-deriving where you were
Generate and verify a pre-demo checklist for an ADK/agent project — env vars, GCP auth, embedding swap, ngrok/Slack wiring, dry-run, tests, real-vs-synthetic data
Scan a project's docs (README, CLAUDE.md, ADRs, runbooks) for inconsistent project naming, scope, or framing — catches the "README says retail, CLAUDE.md still says Kroger" class of bug
Refresh a project's status — derive current state from code/tests/git, regenerate the project's status memory entry and (if requested) a status section in the README
| name | model-card |
| description | Generate a model card covering overview, intended use, evals, limitations, governance, and versioning |
User runs /model-card followed by a model or feature description, or runs it alone.
/decisions/ or a dedicated /model-cards/ directoryDate: [today]
Owner: [team / person]
Status: [Development / Staging / Production / Deprecated]
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Model ID | |
| Base model (if fine-tuned) | |
| Model type | (e.g., LLM, classifier, embedder) |
| Framework | |
| Hosting | (cloud provider, region, endpoint type) |
| Version | |
| Last updated |
| Benchmark / Eval | Score | Baseline | Date | Notes |
|---|
Include both task performance metrics and safety/fairness metrics. If evals haven't been run, flag [RISK: HIGH].
Bullet list of known weaknesses, hallucination tendencies, demographic biases, or domain gaps. Be specific — vague limitations are not useful.
| Risk | Severity | Mitigation in Place |
|---|
| Item | Status |
|---|---|
| PII handling policy documented | ✅ / ❌ |
| Data retention policy defined | ✅ / ❌ |
| Audit logging enabled | ✅ / ❌ |
| Human review process for high-stakes outputs | ✅ / ❌ |
| Incident response plan exists | ✅ / ❌ |
| Approved by AI governance board / review | ✅ / ❌ |
| Version | Date | Change Summary | Approved By |
|---|