一键导入
review-pr
Review a pull request for code quality, patterns consistency, and potential issues. Use when asked to review a PR by number or URL.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Review a pull request for code quality, patterns consistency, and potential issues. Use when asked to review a PR by number or URL.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Add a new public API method to the Refold SDK with types, JSDoc, and endpoint mapping. Use when adding new SDK functionality.
Code style and formatting conventions for this codebase. Reference this when writing or reviewing code to ensure consistency.
Verify code quality, catch bugs, and validate implementation against codebase patterns. Use for testing, linting, type-checking, and manual review.
| name | review-pr |
| description | Review a pull request for code quality, patterns consistency, and potential issues. Use when asked to review a PR by number or URL. |
| metadata | {"author":"iamtraction","version":"1.0.0","argument-hint":"<pr-number-or-url>"} |
Perform a thorough code review of a GitHub pull request.
The user provides a PR number or URL (e.g., 123, https://github.com/gocobalt/refold-js/pull/123).
gh pr view {number} --json title,body,files,additions,deletions,baseRefName,headRefNamegh pr diff {number}dependencies added to package.json@deprecated JSDoc, not removed@param and @returnsfetch API used — no axios, node-fetch, or other HTTP librarieswindow.open() + polling patternany types unless truly unavoidableAuthorization headerpage/limit parameters where applicableconnected and auth_type fields preserved (deprecated, not removed)eval(), Function(), or dynamic code executionget*, create*, update*, delete*, execute*## PR Review: #{number} — {title}
### Summary
Brief description of what the PR does.
### Critical Issues
- **[file:line]** Description of critical issue
### Suggestions
- **[file:line]** Description of improvement suggestion
### Nits
- **[file:line]** Minor style/preference issue
### Positive Notes
- Things done well worth calling out