菜单
Abbreviated code review for small or low-stakes code changes. Skips requirements gathering. Skips the linter in PR mode (CI runs it). Focuses on correctness against obvious intent, readability, and pattern consistency. For large or security-sensitive diffs, use code-review-deep instead.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
Computes the optimal Claude usage-window ping schedule from work hours and creates or reconciles the scheduled cloud routines that pin the window boundaries.
Reviews changes to prose files (markdown, text, blog posts, docs). Focuses on voice, grammar, factual claims, dead links, and structure. Loads the project's voice or style guide when one exists. Skips linter and Actions hash verification.
Full code review for large or security-sensitive changes. Gathers requirements first, loads all relevant language references, runs the linter where applicable, applies the full review checklist with security as the top priority.
Reviews infrastructure changes: GitHub Actions workflows, Terraform, Dockerfiles, docker-compose, IaC. Focuses on supply-chain pinning, secret handling, least-privilege permissions, action versions, and CI failure modes. Always verifies action hash pins when present.
Orchestrator. Triages a PR, local diff, patch file, or staged/branch changes into one of four review types (content, code-lite, code-deep, infra) and dispatches to the matching child skill. Use this when you don't already know which depth or type of review you want. For a known type, invoke the child skill directly.
Produces a one-shot devil's-advocate critique of a plan, design, or decision: steel-manned strengths first, then severity-tagged findings each with a concrete alternative, then a verdict.
| name | code-review-lite |
| description | Abbreviated code review for small or low-stakes code changes. Skips requirements gathering. Skips the linter in PR mode (CI runs it). Focuses on correctness against obvious intent, readability, and pattern consistency. For large or security-sensitive diffs, use code-review-deep instead. |
| when_to_use | Use for code reviews on small, low-stakes diffs (no security paths, under ~500 lines). Invoked directly with a PR URL or diff file path, or dispatched by `/code-review`. Follow all steps in order; do not shortcut based on this description. |
| argument-hint | [PR URL | path to diff file] [--source=...] [--pr=<URL>] [--file=<path>] [--lint] |
| effort | high |
| allowed-tools | Bash(git *) Bash(gh *) Bash(composer *) Bash(npm *) Bash(make *) Read Grep |
Read ~/.claude/skills/code-review/references/review-shared.md and follow its source detection and diff fetching sections. If --source and the corresponding identifier args were passed, use those and skip any prompting.
Skip the linter when source mode is pr and --lint was not passed (CI runs the linter on the PR).
Otherwise run the linter per the linter detection section of the shared doc.
If any changed path matches \.(js|jsx|ts|tsx|mjs|cjs)$, read ~/.claude/skills/code-review/references/js-security.md.
If the diff contains any line matching ^\+\s*uses:\s+\S+@[0-9a-f]{40}, run the verification per the shared doc.
Read ~/.claude/skills/code-review/references/review-checklist.md first for general principles.
Focus on:
Do not deep-dive architecture or push for refactors beyond the diff. Honour the common review rules in the shared doc.
Format per the output section of ~/.claude/skills/code-review/references/review-shared.md.
