| name | code-review-practices |
| description | Code review best practices, quality gates, security checks, and constructive feedback guidelines for collaborative development |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
Code Review Practices Skill
🔴 AI FIRST Quality Principle
Apply the AI FIRST principle: never accept first-pass quality. Minimum 2 iterations. Read all output, improve every section. No shortcuts.
Purpose
Establishes effective code review practices that improve code quality, catch bugs early, and maintain security standards while fostering collaborative development.
Review Checklist
MUST CHECK
- Functionality — Code solves the stated problem, edge cases handled
- Design — Follows project patterns, appropriate abstraction
- Code Quality — Readable, maintainable, DRY, proper naming
- Testing — Unit tests included, coverage adequate, edge cases tested
- Security — No hardcoded secrets, input validation, XSS/injection prevention
- Performance — No obvious inefficiencies, queries optimized
- Documentation — README updated, complex logic explained
PR Size Guidelines
- Small: < 200 lines (ideal)
- Medium: 200-500 lines (acceptable)
- Large: 500-1000 lines (split if possible)
- XL: > 1000 lines (must split)
Feedback Guidelines
Effective Comments
- Focus on code, not the person
- Provide constructive suggestions with examples
- Use labels:
MUST FIX, SHOULD FIX, NIT, QUESTION, SUGGESTION, PRAISE
Security-Focused Review
- Authentication/authorization checks
- Input validation and sanitization
- No secrets in code, secure logging
- Dependencies from trusted sources
- Lock files updated
Approval Criteria
- ✅ APPROVE: All MUST FIX resolved, tests passing, security checks pass
- 💬 COMMENT: Clarification needed, non-blocking suggestions
- 🔄 REQUEST CHANGES: Critical bugs, security vulnerabilities, missing tests
Related Policies