ru-score

name	ru-score
description	Score Russian text 0.0–10.0 across five dimensions: typography, clean language, grammar, structure, precision for the reader. Triggers: оцени текст, ru-score, оценка качества текста, насколько хорош текст, балл за текст. Use when the user wants a number rather than a list of findings. Never edits a file.
allowed-tools	Read, Grep, Glob
disallowed-tools	Write, Edit, NotebookEdit, Bash, PowerShell, Monitor
context	fork
user-invocable	true

Russian Text Quality Score

Score the text provided in $ARGUMENTS (or the most recent Russian text output if no arguments) using the ru-text scoring rubric.

Procedure

Where the reference files live

This skill reads the corpus that ships with the ru-text skill, which is installed alongside it. Locate that folder once, then read the named files from it:

• Look for a directory named references whose parent directory is named ru-text, and which contains info-style.md. Every file named below sits in that folder.
• In Claude Code the plugin root is also available directly, which saves the search.
• Do not guess a path. If the folder cannot be found, say so and stop — a check run against remembered rules instead of the corpus is not this command, and reporting one as the other is the failure this whole product exists to prevent.

1. Load rubric — read scoring.md for the full rubric with anchors.

2. Determine domain — identify whether the text is UI/interface, business email, article, or general:

   • UI text → also load ux-writing.md for the Reader Precision dimension
   • Business email → also load business-writing.md for the Reader Precision dimension
   • General → use info-style.md only

3. Evaluate each dimension separately — score in this order:

   • T — Типографика (weight 0.15): quotes, dashes, spaces, special characters per typography.md
   • Ч — Чистота языка (weight 0.25): stop-words, bureaucratic language, clichés, passive voice per info-style.md + anti-patterns.md
   • Г — Грамотность (weight 0.20): punctuation, agreement, tautology per editorial-grammar.md + editorial-punctuation.md
   • С — Структура (weight 0.20): logical flow, paragraphs, transitions, heading use per info-style.md structure section + addenda.md
   • Ц — Точность для читателя (weight 0.20): facts, evidence, reader benefit, actionability per domain rules

4. For each dimension — assign a score (0.0–10.0) using the rubric anchors in scoring.md. List 1–3 specific issues, quoting the problematic text fragment.

5. Apply non-compensatory rules:

   • Any dimension < 3.0 → cap total at 5.0
   • Typography < 4.0 → cap total at 7.0
   • Grammar < 4.0 → cap total at 7.0
   • Use the most restrictive cap when multiple conditions trigger

6. Compute composite score:

   S = round₁(T × 0.15 + Ч × 0.25 + Г × 0.20 + С × 0.20 + Ц × 0.20)
   

7. Short text warning — if text is under 50 words, prepend a reliability caveat.

Score labels

Score	Label
9.0–10.0	Эталонный
7.0–8.9	Хороший
5.0–6.9	Средний
3.0–4.9	Слабый
0.0–2.9	Критический

Output format

Read-only — do NOT modify the source files. ru-score reports a score and issues; it must not write to, edit, or overwrite the analysed file(s).

In Claude Code this is hardened by disallowed-tools, which removes the listed tools while the command is active — verified on 2.1.220. The list removes the direct file-writers Write, Edit and NotebookEdit, plus the command-executing tools we identified and tested: Bash, PowerShell and Monitor. It names the paths we closed, not every path that exists. allowed-tools pre-approves tools; it does not restrict them.

Four limits, stated plainly. A connected MCP server can expose write tools that a per-tool denial list cannot know about. A named subagent whose own definition grants it tools: Write is governed by that definition, not by this list. A later Claude Code release can add a tool this file does not name. And on hosts without disallowed-tools support the rule is an instruction rather than a platform guarantee.

The contract itself is behavioural and does not depend on the list: this command returns a score and never writes.

The report shape is not written twice. Read section «Output format» of scoring.md — the mandated heading, the five Russian dimension labels, the per-cell limit of one to three issues with quoted fragments, the weighted formula, the cap note, and the closing «Что оценка не измеряет» section — and follow it exactly.

That file is the single source of it. A copy lived here until v2.0 and sat outside the no-loss gate, so the two could drift and only a reader comparing them would notice.

If a dimension has no issues, write «Замечаний нет» in the remarks column.