菜单
Open the current branch's diff (or a specific PR) in Plannotator's browser-based code review UI and act on the returned feedback. Use when the user says "review my changes in plannotator", "open the diff for review", "review this PR in plannotator", "let me annotate the diff", or returns to a session to gate code the agent produced.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Best practices for working with Go codebases. Use when writing, debugging, or exploring Go code, including reading dependency sources and documentation.
Autonomous orchestration loop for hive hc tasks. The high-capability manager model reads pending tasks, delegates implementation to cheaper worker sub-agents, critically reviews their output, and commits only code that passes quality checks. Runs to completion without stopping to ask questions.
Post-implementation design re-evaluation. After a feature reaches a working state through iteration, step back and re-examine what actually got built: are the data structures and algorithms the right fit for the access patterns that emerged, can code paths that grew through iteration be consolidated, and what iteration residue (tests for abandoned designs, dead flags/scaffolding, debug logging) should be deleted. Produces a tiered proposal report and applies only approved changes. Use when the user says "rethink this", "step back and re-evaluate", "is this the right design/data structure", "apply CS fundamentals", or wants a design pass on a working feature branch before PR. Not for bug-hunting (/review) or expression-level polish (/simplify) — this questions the design those skills preserve.
Orchestrate parallel claude and codex CLI agents through tmux to deliver a feature end-to-end. The orchestrator delegates planning, work, and review to spawned agents in tmux windows; it does NOT write or edit code itself. User-invoked only.
Single-pass code review of the current branch (or a diff) that routes the changes to relevant concerns, dispatches fresh-context reviewer sub-agents, verifies findings to strip false positives, and reports a ranked, evidence-backed review. Use when the user asks to review local changes, a branch, or a PR before it goes to humans.
Spawn codex as an independent external reviewer in a new tmux window. Codex performs a general PR review and publishes findings back via hive messaging. Use standalone for an external second opinion, or alongside /review to run both concurrently.
| name | diff-review |
| description | Open the current branch's diff (or a specific PR) in Plannotator's browser-based code review UI and act on the returned feedback. Use when the user says "review my changes in plannotator", "open the diff for review", "review this PR in plannotator", "let me annotate the diff", or returns to a session to gate code the agent produced. |
| allowed-tools | Bash(plannotator:*),Read |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Open code changes in Plannotator's review UI, then act on the user's feedback in the same conversation. Plannotator's review mode handles both the current worktree (no args) and a specific PR (URL).
$ARGUMENTS controls what gets reviewed:
| Argument | Behavior |
|---|---|
| empty | Current branch's working changes vs base |
| GitHub PR URL | That pull request |
| Gitea/Forgejo PR URL | That pull request (if Plannotator supports the host) |
Don't try to detect or resolve the current PR yourself — plannotator review
already inspects the worktree when called with no args. Just pass $ARGUMENTS
through.
plannotator review $ARGUMENTS
Run the command yourself. Don't ask the user to copy it into a terminal.
/review instead — that runs parallel sub-agents. This skill is for the
human-in-the-loop browser review, not automated review./doc-review.