sextant-migrate

name

sextant-migrate

description

Use when migrating code from one version, technology, or pattern to another — such as Vue 2 → Vue 3, JavaScript → TypeScript, database schema migration, or framework upgrades. Stronger signals: "migrate", "upgrade", "convert", "port", "move from X to Y". Distinct from sextant-modify-feature (single module behavior change); use this when multiple modules must change in a coordinated sequence with rollback points.

!awk 'f;/^---$/{c++}c==2{f=1}' ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../principles/SKILL.md

![ -d .gitnexus ] && awk 'f;/^---$/{c++}c==2{f=1}' ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../tool-gitnexus/SKILL.md || true

---

Migration Workflow

Core Principle

Migrations are multi-module, stateful, and partially irreversible. The core strategy is migrate in dependency order, validate at every checkpoint, and keep rollback options open until all modules are confirmed working.

Distinct from sextant-modify-feature: Modify-feature changes one module's behavior. Migration coordinates changes across many modules in a defined sequence, with compatibility shims and a rollback plan at each phase boundary.

---

Complete Execution Workflow

Step 1: Migration Scope Scan

Enumerate all affected files and produce a migration inventory:

• List every file that references the old API, type, pattern, or version
• Score the total impact using the Impact Radius Scorecard (§3.2)
• Identify dependency relationships between affected files

Migration Inventory
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Migration: <from X> → <to Y>
Impact radius score: N → <Tier>

File                   | Change Type             | Dependency Order
───────────────────────|─────────────────────────|──────────────────────
<file A>               | <API call → new API>    | leaf (migrate first)
<file B>               | <type annotation>       | depends on A
<file C>               | <core module>           | migrate last
─────────────────────────────────────────────

🔗 When GitNexus is available, use impact MCP tool to enumerate all dependents automatically.

Step 2: Compatibility Assessment

For each breaking change in the migration:

• Is there a compatibility shim available (e.g., an adapter, polyfill, or compatibility layer)?
• What is the backward compatibility window — can the old and new API coexist during migration?
• Is there runtime coercion risk — can old data be silently misinterpreted by the new code?

Compatibility Assessment
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Breaking change: <description>
  Shim available:         Yes (<name / approach>) / No
  Old/new coexistence:    Yes (window: <duration / version range>) / No
  Runtime coercion risk:  Yes (describe) / No
  Rollback approach:      <how to revert this step if it fails>
─────────────────────────────────────────────

If no shim is available and old/new cannot coexist: flag as a hard-cutover migration step. These steps require explicit user authorization before execution.

Step 3: Migration Order Planning

Ordering rule (per §6.2 dependency direction): migrate leaf modules first, core modules last.

Migration Sequence
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Phase 1 (no dependents): <leaf files — safe to migrate first>
Phase 2 (depend on Phase 1 only): <next tier>
...
Phase N (core): <modules with the most dependents — migrate last>

Rollback boundary after each phase: if Phase N+1 fails, revert only Phase N.
─────────────────────────────────────────────

Each phase should be a separate commit — this preserves rollback granularity and makes the migration history bisectable.

Step 4: Per-Module Migration + Validation

For each module, in the order established in Step 3:

1. Apply the migration to this module only
2. Run the associated tests for this module (and its direct callers)
3. If tests pass: continue to the next module
4. If tests fail: stop. Do not continue to the next module. Diagnose the failure — link sextant-debug if the root cause is not immediately clear.

Per-Module Migration Log
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Module: <file / module name>
Change applied: <description>
Tests run: <test file(s) or test command>
Result: ✅ Pass — proceed to next module / ❌ Fail — stopped (diagnosis below)
─────────────────────────────────────────────

Forbidden: Migrating multiple modules between test runs. Each module migration must be validated before the next begins.

Step 5: Legacy Code Cleanup

After all modules pass validation, remove migration scaffolding in a separate commit:

• Delete compatibility shims and adapters
• Remove old type aliases and version-compatibility branches
• Remove @deprecated annotations added for this migration
• Remove feature flags introduced to gate the migration

Cleanup Checklist
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
[ ] Compatibility shims removed
[ ] Old type aliases / version branches deleted
[ ] @deprecated annotations cleared
[ ] Migration feature flags removed
[ ] Tests updated to remove compatibility-mode paths
[ ] Documentation updated (README, CHANGELOG, migration guide)
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Why a separate commit? Cleanup changes are low-risk and mechanical. Keeping them separate from functional migration changes makes both easier to review and easier to bisect if a regression appears later.

---

Forbidden Actions

• Do not migrate multiple modules in a single step without validating each — this removes rollback granularity
• Do not delete the old API or shim before all consumers have been migrated and tested
• Do not make behavioral changes alongside migration changes — migration commits must be pure migrations (structure changes only, behavior preserved)

---

Sprint State Integration

If .sextant/state.json exists in the project root and the current task matches a sprint task:

• On start: offer to update the task's status from pending → in_progress. Ask: "Update sprint state to mark Task N as in_progress?"
• On completion (acceptance condition met): offer to update status to done. Ask: "Update sprint state to mark Task N as done?"
• On blocker (test failure, missing dependency, unresolvable ambiguity that halts progress): surface the issue, then ask: "Mark Task N as blocked and record the reason in flags?" If confirmed, set status: "blocked" and append {"task": N, "reason": "<one-sentence blocker description>"} to the top-level flags array. Do not proceed to the next task while a task is blocked.

Do not write the file without explicit user confirmation. If the user declines, continue without state updates.

---

Reply Format

─── Migration Summary ───────────────────────────────
① Scope:             <N files; impact radius N → Tier; N phases planned>
② Compatibility:     <shims available / hard-cutover steps flagged (N require authorization)>
③ Sequence:          <phase-by-phase plan with rollback boundaries>
④ Current status:    <Phase N of M: ✅ complete / ❌ stopped at <module> (diagnosis: <root cause>)>
⑤ Needs your input: <hard-cutover steps requiring explicit authorization; test failures to diagnose>
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────