一键导入
writing-plans
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
根据用户描述生成高质量绘图 prompt,并按通用、roadmap、schematic 模式调用 gpt-image-2 或 Nano Banana/Gemini 图片模型 API;gpt-image-2 默认使用低画质、原生尺寸和 JPEG,第 2 轮起基于上一轮图片做保真微调。
当用户明确要求"测试代码"、"运行代码审查"或"进行代码自检"时使用。通过多轮 A 轮批判性代码审查 + B 轮代码质量原则检查,系统化发现、记录、修复程序代码中的问题,并将计划/过程/结果统一沉淀到目标代码根目录的 `.bensz-api/task-{yyyymmdd-hhmm}-{简短描述}/auto-test-code/{yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm}/output/tests/` 隔离工作区。⚠️ 不适用:用户只是想优化功能(应直接修改)、只是询问代码问题(应直接回答)、没有明确"测试代码"意图。
当用户明确要求"测试项目"、"运行 auto-test-project"或"进行项目级测试"时使用。对完整项目进行多轮 A 轮批判性测试 + B 轮质量检查,系统化发现、记录、修复问题。⚠️ 不适用:用户只是想优化功能(应直接修改)、只是询问项目问题(应直接回答)、没有明确"测试"意图。
当用户明确要求"测试技能"、"运行 auto-test"或"进行批判性测试"时使用。通过多轮 A 轮批判性测试 + B 轮质量原则检查,系统化发现、记录、修复问题,并沉淀可追溯的 `.bensz-api/task-{yyyymmdd-hhmm}-{简短描述}/auto-test-skill/output/plans/` 与 `.bensz-api/task-{yyyymmdd-hhmm}-{简短描述}/auto-test-skill/output/tests/` 文档。⚠️ 不适用:用户只是想优化功能(应直接修改)、只是询问技能问题(应直接回答)、没有明确"测试"意图。
后端开发专家。精通 Node.js/Python/Go/Rust 等后端技术栈,专注于 API 设计、数据库优化、认证授权、微服务架构和性能调优。用于后端服务开发、API 设计和系统架构。
当用户明确要求"使用 brainstorming"或"使用 awesome-code"时使用。⚠️ 不适用:用户只是想优化/改进某个功能(应直接修改)、只是询问技能问题(应直接回答)、没有明确使用 brainstorming/awesome-code 的一般性开发。
| name | writing-plans |
| description | Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code |
| metadata | {"author":"Bensz Conan","keywords":["writing-plans"]} |
本 Skill 的新任务中间文件统一写入 ./.bensz-api/task-{yyyymmdd-hhmm}-{简短描述}/{skill名}/input|output|log/。同一任务复用一个任务根目录;多 Skill 协作才创建 shared/。正式交付物不写入该目录,历史隐藏目录只允许显式兼容读取、迁移或清理。
bensz-collect-bugs 规范记录到 ~/.bensz-skills/bugs/,不要直接修改用户本地已安装的 skill 源码;若有 workaround,先记 bug,再继续完成任务。gh 上传新增 bug 到 huangwb8/bensz-bugs;不要 pull / clone 整个仓库。Write implementation plans sized to the task risk. Small, localized work should get a short closed-loop plan; complex or high-risk work should get the full task tree with explicit tests, affected files, dependencies, and rollback/verification notes. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.
Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.
Announce at start: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."
Context: This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill).
Save plans to: docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md
Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):
Do not inflate a small task into a large plan just because the planning skill is active.
Every plan MUST start with this header:
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan
> **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.
**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]
**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]
**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]
**Minimal Change Scope:** [Allowed paths and explicit avoid list]
**Success Criteria:** [Observable checks that prove completion]
**Verification Plan:** [Exact commands or manual checks]
---
### Task N: [Component Name]
**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/to/file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145`
- Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py`
**Step 1: Write the failing test**
```python
def test_specific_behavior():
result = function(input)
assert result == expected
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v
Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
def function(input):
return expected
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"
## Remember
- Exact file paths always
- Complete code in plan (not "add validation")
- Exact commands with expected output
- Reference relevant skills with @ syntax
- DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits
## Execution Handoff
After saving the plan, offer execution choice:
**"Plan complete and saved to `docs/plans/<filename>.md`. Two execution options:**
**1. Subagent-Driven (this session)** - I dispatch fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration
**2. Parallel Session (separate)** - Open new session with executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints
**Which approach?"**
**If Subagent-Driven chosen:**
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development
- Stay in this session
- Fresh subagent per task + code review
**If Parallel Session chosen:**
- Guide them to open new session in worktree
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** New session uses superpowers:executing-plans