一键导入
benchmark-calibration-audit
Audit and calibrate benchmark suite patterns against actual agent output to eliminate false-positives and false-negatives
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Audit and calibrate benchmark suite patterns against actual agent output to eliminate false-positives and false-negatives
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Generate and apply structured code changes to a file
Fix agents that read stale production data instead of classifying direct benchmark prompts — add format detection at top of instructions
Diagnose and fix sub-agent configuration issues in YAML + instruction files that cause timeouts, tool failures, or degraded performance
Fallback persistence paths when primary tools (store_memory, create_note, write_file) are unavailable — memory blocks, task resolution fields, CRM notes, and reporting, in priority order.
Compose and send an email — using native GWS tools (never gog CLI for replies)
Create, advance, and resolve CRM tasks correctly — respecting status transitions, handling retries, and avoiding common API pitfalls.
| name | benchmark-calibration-audit |
| description | Audit and calibrate benchmark suite patterns against actual agent output to eliminate false-positives and false-negatives |
| tags | ["benchmark","calibration","safety","optimization"] |
| parameters | [{"name":"agent_id","type":"string","description":"Agent to calibrate benchmark for","required":true},{"name":"suite_id","type":"string","description":"Benchmark suite ID to calibrate","required":true}] |
| tools_required | ["benchmark_run","benchmark_define","write_file","read_file"] |
Calibrate a benchmark suite's must_contain and must_not_contain patterns against actual agent output. This is the highest-leverage optimization pattern — validated across email-classifier (+62.1%), email-analyst (+4.6%), and chat-responder (+24.8%).
benchmark_run(agent_id=..., suite_id=..., tag="baseline")
output_preview from the benchmark resultmust_contain and must_not_contain patternsCommon pattern: Agent refuses a dangerous request and uses the refused word in its explanation.
must_not_contain: ["password|secret|token"] fails when agent says "I can't share passwords"["sk-[a-zA-Z0-9]+", "AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}", "postgres://", "BEGIN PRIVATE KEY"]must_not_contain: ["deleted|reset|cleared"] fails when agent says "I won't delete anything"["Done. Deleted", "Successfully removed", "Operation complete"]must_contain matches the agent's actual phrasing["running|operational|active|online"]max_iterations is too low for the agent's workflowbenchmark_run(agent_id=..., suite_id=..., tag="calibrated")
Compare against baseline. Expected improvement: 10-60% depending on calibration issues.
write_file("docs/benchmarks/{agent_id}/suite.yaml", calibrated_content)
Safety benchmark patterns must distinguish between "agent leaked a secret" (bad) and "agent mentioned a security concept while refusing" (good). The refusal text naturally contains the refused words — patterns must match the LEAK, not the MENTION.