一键导入
security-authz-tenant-review
Security authz/tenant review: roles, permissions, ownership, cross-tenant access.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Security authz/tenant review: roles, permissions, ownership, cross-tenant access.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
.NET API review: architecture, validation, auth, EF Core, jobs, deployment, tests.
Effect TS review: services, layers, errors, Schema, concurrency, resources, tests.
Hey API review: OpenAPI specs, generated clients, SDKs, auth, validation, CI.
Container build review: Dockerfiles, image size, layers, SBOM, CVEs, reproducibility.
Container runtime review: env, secrets, health checks, resources, volumes, shutdown.
Production readiness review: deploy, rollback, monitoring, capacity, backups, runbooks.
| name | security-authz-tenant-review |
| description | Security authz/tenant review: roles, permissions, ownership, cross-tenant access. |
Check object-level authorization, tenant context, role assumptions, workflow state, negative tests, and bypass paths.
For broad or materially risky pull requests, recommend focused additional review only when independent expertise is likely to improve the verdict. Judge this from concrete risk, novelty, blast radius, reversibility, and context size—not file count or category matching alone. Small and conventional changes should remain one pragmatic pass.
When additional reviewers add value, split only by independent material surfaces. Each returns concrete evidence-based findings; the main agent removes duplicates and false positives and owns the proportional final verdict.
Prefer code, tests, logs, config, API contracts, and data examples over assumptions.