| name | fn-args-deps |
| description | Enforces the fn(args, deps) pattern, business logic as functions with explicit dependency injection instead of classes. Use when writing or refactoring TypeScript business logic, replacing service classes, deciding how to structure dependencies, setting up a composition root, or making functions testable with mocked collaborators. |
| version | 1.1.0 |
| libraries | ["vitest-mock-extended"] |
Functions Over Classes: fn(args, deps)
Overview
All business logic is written as plain functions with the signature fn(args, deps), never as service classes:
- args: per-call input data (varies on every invocation)
- deps: long-lived collaborators (injected infrastructure: db, logger, mailer)
The two parameters are kept separate because they have different lifetimes. args change every call; deps are wired once and reused. Splitting them makes dependency bloat visible at the type level (a function whose deps keeps growing is doing too much), keeps composition trivial, and makes every function testable by passing a mock deps: no class instantiation, no beforeEach wiring, no hidden this.
This pattern is the foundation the rest of the architecture builds on: result-types defines what these functions return, validation-boundary defines what their args are trusted to contain, and testing-strategy relies on the injected deps to mock collaborators.
When to Use
- Writing any new business-logic function
- Refactoring a service class into composable functions
- Deciding whether a dependency should be injected or imported
- Setting up a composition root to wire dependencies once
- Making code testable without instantiating heavy objects
When NOT to use: Framework-mandated classes (NestJS providers, Express error middleware), stateful resources with a lifecycle (connection pools, caches), and fluent builders. In those cases use a thin class wrapper that delegates to pure fn(args, deps) functions. See When Classes ARE Acceptable.
Related: result-types (what the function returns), validation-boundary (what args are trusted to contain), testing-strategy and writing-tests (mocking deps), observability (wrapping these functions), strict-typescript (the compiler flags that enforce this).
For how this layer fits the whole system, see references/architecture.md.
Required Behaviors
1. Per-Function Dependency Types
ALWAYS declare explicit deps types for each function:
type GetUserDeps = {
db: Database;
logger: Logger;
};
async function getUser(
args: { userId: string },
deps: GetUserDeps
): Promise<User | null> {
deps.logger.info(`Getting user ${args.userId}`);
return deps.db.findUser(args.userId);
}
async function getUser(
args: { userId: string },
deps: AllServiceDeps
): Promise<User | null>
2. No Classes for Business Logic
Classes become problematic when:
- 10+ methods accumulate over time
- Private helpers create implicit coupling via
this
- Constructor grows to satisfy every method's needs
class UserService {
constructor(
private db: Database,
private logger: Logger,
private mailer: Mailer,
private cache: Cache,
) {}
}
type GetUserDeps = { db: Database; logger: Logger };
type CreateUserDeps = { db: Database; logger: Logger; mailer: Mailer };
3. Factory at the Boundary (Composition Root)
Wire deps ONCE at the boundary, not at every call site:
export function createUserService({ deps }: { deps: UserServiceDeps }) {
return {
getUser: ({ userId }: { userId: string }) =>
getUser({ userId }, deps),
createUser: ({ name, email }: { name: string; email: string }) =>
createUser({ name, email }, deps),
};
}
const deps = { db, logger, mailer };
const userService = createUserService({ deps });
await userService.getUser({ userId: '123' });
4. Grouping Related Functions
When you have many related functions (5+), choose one approach per module:
Approach 1: Inject Individually (default)
Use when most consumers only need 1–2 functions:
export async function getUser(args: { userId: string }, deps: GetUserDeps) { ... }
export async function createUser(args: { name: string; email: string }, deps: CreateUserDeps) { ... }
export type GetUserFn = typeof getUser;
export type CreateUserFn = typeof createUser;
export type NotificationHandlerDeps = {
sendWelcomeEmail: SendWelcomeEmailFn;
};
Approach 2: Inject as Grouped Object (when they travel together)
Use when functions form a cohesive module and consumers inject the same set:
export const userFns = {
getUser,
createUser,
updateUser,
deleteUser,
sendWelcomeEmail,
} as const;
export type UserFns = typeof userFns;
export type UserRouterDeps = {
userFns: UserFns;
};
Rule of thumb: Default to injecting individually. Group only when functions travel together. If grouping feels like a "god object", split it.
5. Inject Only What You'll Mock
Only inject things that hit network, disk, or clock. Import pure utilities directly:
function createUser(args, deps: { db, logger, slugify, randomUUID }) { }
import { slugify } from 'slugify';
import { randomUUID } from 'crypto';
function createUser(args, deps: { db, logger }) { }
6. Type-Only Imports for Interfaces
Use import type to prevent runtime coupling:
import type { Mailer } from '../infra/mailer';
import { mailer } from '../infra/mailer';
Testing Pattern
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
import { mock } from 'vitest-mock-extended';
import { getUser, type GetUserDeps } from './get-user';
it('returns user when found', async () => {
const mockUser = { id: '123', name: 'Alice', email: 'alice@test.com' };
const deps = mock<GetUserDeps>();
deps.db.findUser.mockResolvedValue(mockUser);
const result = await getUser({ userId: '123' }, deps);
expect(result).toEqual(mockUser);
});
Migration Strategy (Strangler Fig)
Phase 1: Add deps with defaults (backward compatible)
import { mailer as _mailer, type Mailer } from '../infra/mailer';
const defaultDeps: SendEmailDeps = { mailer: _mailer };
export async function sendEmail(
recipient: User,
sender: User,
deps: SendEmailDeps = defaultDeps
) { ... }
Phase 2: Remove defaults (explicit DI required)
import type { Mailer } from '../infra/mailer';
export async function sendEmail(
recipient: User,
sender: User,
deps: SendEmailDeps
) { ... }
Phase 3 (Optional): Use object parameters
export async function sendEmail(
args: { recipient: User; sender: User },
deps: SendEmailDeps
) { ... }
When Classes ARE Acceptable
Classes are fine for:
| Use Case | Why It's OK |
|---|
| Framework integration | NestJS, Express middleware require class syntax |
| Stateful resources | Connection pools, caches with lifecycle |
| Builder patterns | Fluent APIs where method chaining adds clarity |
| Thin wrappers | Delegating to pure functions (see below) |
Classes are NOT OK for:
- Business logic (use functions)
- Anything that will grow beyond 3-4 methods
- When you find yourself adding private helpers
Framework Integration (NestJS)
Use classes as thin wrappers, keep logic in pure functions:
async function createUser(
args: CreateUserInput,
deps: { db: Database; logger: Logger }
): Promise<Result<User, 'EMAIL_EXISTS' | 'DB_ERROR'>> {
}
@Injectable()
export class UserService {
constructor(private db: Database, private logger: Logger) {}
async createUser(args: CreateUserInput) {
return createUser(args, { db: this.db, logger: this.logger });
}
}
Performance Considerations
Critics sometimes worry that creating many small objects (args objects, deps bags, factory functions) increases garbage collection pressure.
Modern V8 engines (Orinoco) use generational garbage collection. Objects that die young, like the temporary objects created during request handling, are reclaimed almost instantly. V8 is efficient at this.
For I/O-bound web applications:
| Operation | Typical Latency |
|---|
| Database query | 1-50ms |
| HTTP request | 10-500ms |
| Object allocation | 0.0001ms |
The database query is 10,000-500,000x slower than object allocation. The architectural clarity and type safety of the fn(args, deps) pattern far outweigh any micro-overhead.
When to worry about allocation:
- Tight loops processing millions of items
- Real-time systems with hard latency requirements
- Memory-constrained embedded environments
For typical web services, don't optimize for GC. Optimize for correctness, testability, and maintainability.
Enforcement
Enable in tsconfig.json:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"verbatimModuleSyntax": true
}
}
ESLint rule to prevent infra imports:
"no-restricted-imports": ["error", {
patterns: [{
group: ["**/infra/**"],
message: "Domain code must not import from infra. Inject dependencies instead."
}]
}]
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|
| "A class groups related methods nicely" | A module of exported functions groups them just as well, without a constructor that must satisfy every method's deps. |
| "I'll just inject all deps as one big object" | A god deps object hides which function uses what and makes every test wire dependencies it doesn't need. Declare per-function deps types. |
"It's easier to new UserService() everywhere" | That couples every call site to construction. Wire deps once at the composition root and pass the resulting object around. |
| "I need to inject the slug helper so I can mock it" | If it's pure (no network, disk, or clock) you never need to mock it. Import it directly; only inject things you'll fake. |
| "Importing the mailer directly is simpler" | A runtime import couples your domain to infrastructure and makes it unmockable. Use import type and inject the instance. |
| "Allocating all these small objects will hurt GC" | V8's generational GC reclaims short-lived objects almost instantly. A DB query is 10,000x+ slower than an allocation. Optimize for clarity. |
Red Flags
- A class whose constructor takes dependencies that only some methods use
- A
deps object passed to a function that uses fewer than half its fields
import { mailer } from '../infra/mailer' (runtime import) inside domain code
- Injecting pure utilities (
slugify, randomUUID) just to mock them
- A factory/composition step running inside a request handler instead of once at startup
- Private helper methods relying on
this to share state between methods
- A "service" class that has grown past 3-4 methods of pure business logic
Verification
After writing or refactoring business logic: