菜单
Evaluates content substance through 4-axis analysis (meaning, facts, framing, context). Separates signal from noise. Use when the user says 'quality check', 'fact check', 'is this solid', 'substance check', 'how relevant', or wants to assess content quality.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Orchestrates automatic and manual output quality checks. Coordinates signal-check, challenge, and external verification based on risk triage. Trigger via /quality-gate, /qg, or automatically for risk outputs (numbers, forecasts, causal claims, consequential recommendations).
Captures ideas, notes, links, and thoughts quickly. Use when the user says 'note', 'idea', 'capture', 'save this', 'remember', or wants to save something for later.
Adversarial stress-testing of ideas, plans, decisions, and strategies. Finds weak points, simulates stakeholder objections, surfaces hidden assumptions, and runs pre-mortems. Use when the user says 'challenge', 'stress-test', 'red team', 'objections', 'counter-arguments', 'what could go wrong', 'weaknesses', 'devil's advocate', 'blind spots', 'find holes', or wants to pressure-test thinking before committing.
Analyzes complex topics through the ReAct cycle (Plan-Act-Reflect-Repeat). Structures multi-step investigations with transparent reasoning. Use when the user says 'analyze', 'investigate', 'evaluate', 'deep dive', 'what is behind this', or needs structured problem analysis.
Distills texts through Progressive Summarization in 4 layers (original, bold, highlight, executive summary). Use when the user says 'summarize', 'distill', 'key points', 'condense', 'essence', or wants to compress a long document.
Generates polished outputs from knowledge — articles, posts, presentations, emails. Uses POPP method and UX principles. Use when the user says 'write', 'draft', 'create content', 'blog post', 'formulate', or wants a finished text output.
| name | signal-check |
| description | Evaluates content substance through 4-axis analysis (meaning, facts, framing, context). Separates signal from noise. Use when the user says 'quality check', 'fact check', 'is this solid', 'substance check', 'how relevant', or wants to assess content quality. |
You distinguish between signal and noise. Analyze content systematically — not to judge, but to see more clearly.
| Mode | When to use | Axes |
|---|---|---|
| Quick Check | Brief assessment | Meaning + Facts |
| Fact Check | Verify specific claim | Facts (+ web research) |
| Meaning Analysis | Assess depth/originality | Meaning |
| Manipulation Analysis | Uncover rhetoric/framing | Framing |
| Full Analysis | Comprehensive review | All 4 axes |
## Signal-Check: [Topic/Claim]
### Meaning: [high/medium/low]
[Core claim + originality + logic]
### Facts: [supported/partial/unsupported]
[Source quality + confirmed vs. asserted]
### Framing: [neutral/biased/manipulative]
[Rhetorical patterns + implicit assumptions]
### Context: [relevant/limited]
[Embedding + scope of validity]
### Verdict: Signal or Noise?
[Clear assessment with reasoning]
This skill serves as evaluator in the chain:
/express → create output
/signal-check → check substance
/express → optimize based on feedback
When called after an /express output: Focus on meaning + facts of the generated text, provide concrete improvement suggestions.