brainstorm

name	brainstorm
description	Creative discovery phase for exploring ideas, directions, and design space before implementation planning or research. Uses Socratic dialogue, research-grade agents, and contrarian challenge to move from seed ideas to chosen directions with structured BRAINSTORM.md output that feeds directly into /deep-plan or /deep-research.
compatibility	agentskills-v1
metadata	{"version":1}

Document Version: 1.0 Last Updated: 2026-04-01 Status: ACTIVE

Brainstorm

Creative discovery that does what jumping straight to planning cannot. Explores the problem space, generates multiple directions, challenges assumptions, and converges on a chosen path — before any implementation decisions are made.

Critical Rules (MUST follow)

1. No artificial caps — no ceiling on agents, convergence loop passes, directions explored, or questions asked. Use as many as needed.
2. Seed ideas are welcome — if the user can't articulate goals, constraints, or success criteria, discovering those becomes part of the brainstorm. Never skip a question because the user doesn't have an answer yet.
3. Contrarian checkpoint is mandatory — before convergence, present honest weaknesses of the leading direction(s). Resist the AI tendency to validate. If an idea has a real flaw, say so.
4. Research-grade agents for unknowns — when the brainstorm touches unfamiliar territory, dispatch deep-research-searcher agents for domain investigation. Do NOT fake understanding with surface-level greps.
5. Minimum 3 directions before convergence — premature convergence on the first idea kills creative exploration. Push back if the user tries to converge too early.
6. Persist state incrementally — save to state file after every phase. Long brainstorms WILL hit compaction.
7. Show artifact inline — write BRAINSTORM.md for persistence, display in conversation as primary output.

When to Use

• User has an idea but direction is unclear — "how should we approach X?"
• Creative decisions with multiple viable paths
• New features, new systems, greenfield exploration
• User says "let's brainstorm" or "I have an idea"
• Seed-stage thinking — half-formed thoughts that need nurturing
• Before /deep-plan when WHAT to build isn't settled

When NOT to Use

• Bug fixes or clear instructions with no ambiguity — just do them
• Direction is clear, need implementation plan — use /deep-plan
• Pure research question — use /deep-research directly
• Task has 3-4 clear decisions — use EnterPlanMode
• Multi-phase project roadmap — use /gsd:new-project
• Note: sc:brainstorm is an external plugin with different methodology. For this project, /brainstorm is the canonical brainstorming skill.

Routing Guide

Situation	Use	Why
Don't know WHAT to build	/brainstorm	Explore directions before planning
Know WHAT, need to plan HOW	/deep-plan	Discovery-first implementation plan
Need domain understanding	/deep-research	Multi-agent investigation
Need to explore THEN plan	/brainstorm then /deep-plan	Natural flow
Need to explore THEN research	/brainstorm then /deep-research	When open questions need investigation

Input

Argument: Topic or idea, passed as /brainstorm <topic> or provided in conversation context. Accepts anything from a vague notion to a detailed concept.

Output: .research/<topic-slug>/BRAINSTORM.md — co-located with research artifacts as an early-stage discovery artifact. Downstream skills (deep-plan, deep-research) discover it naturally during Phase 0. Slug: lowercase, hyphens for spaces/special chars, max 50 chars.

---

Process Overview

WARM-UP:   Orientation    -> Topic, process, seed-idea welcome
PHASE 0:   Context        -> Codebase scan, landscape, agent dispatch if needed
PHASE 1:   Diverge        -> Expansive Socratic exploration, multiple directions
PHASE 2:   Evaluate       -> Tradeoffs, contrarian checkpoint, feasibility
PHASE 3:   Converge       -> User selects direction, rationale captured
PHASE 4:   Crystallize    -> BRAINSTORM.md, CL verify, routing menu

Phase markers: ========== PHASE N: [NAME] ==========

---

Warm-Up (MUST)

Present: topic, process overview, explicit invitation for vague ideas.

"This brainstorm explores what's possible before committing to a direction. Vague ideas are welcome — we'll shape them together. No code will be written."

Done when: User confirms proceed.

---

Phase 0: Context (MUST)

Purpose: Understand the landscape so exploration is grounded, not generic.

1. Check CLAUDE.md for relevant conventions (MUST)
2. Check ROADMAP.md — verify alignment with project direction (MUST)
3. Extraction context (MUST): Scan .research/EXTRACTIONS.md for candidates relevant to the brainstorm topic (human-readable, grouped by source). For targeted filtering, query .research/extraction-journal.jsonl (match by type, tags in notes, or source domain). If matches found, present as "Prior art from analyzed sources" before exploration begins. These are patterns, principles, and tools already identified from external repos/websites — grounding exploration in what's been learned, not starting from zero.
4. Scan codebase for relevant existing systems (MUST)
5. Agent dispatch for unknowns (MUST when applicable):
   • Codebase questions: spawn Explore agents
   • Domain/technology questions: spawn deep-research-searcher agents with sub-question, search profile (web/docs/academic), output path, depth
   • No limit on agent count — dispatch as many as the landscape requires
6. Duplicate check (MUST): Check .research/<topic-slug>/. If BRAINSTORM.md exists, offer: resume, start fresh, or rename.
7. Check .research/ for prior research on related topics (SHOULD)
8. Convergence-loop verify landscape (SHOULD): If Phase 0 makes 3+ claims about codebase state, verify via CL quick preset before presenting.
9. Present landscape summary to user (MUST)

If misaligned with ROADMAP: Present conflict, offer proceed/reframe/abort.

Reframe path: If context reveals the direction is already clear and no creative exploration is needed, suggest: "This looks ready for /deep-plan — brainstorm may not add value here. Proceed with brainstorm or route to planning?"

Phase gate: User confirms landscape or reframes. Do NOT proceed to Diverge until confirmed.

Done when: Landscape understood, summary presented, user confirms.

---

Phase 1: Diverge (MUST)

Purpose: Expansive exploration. Generate multiple directions. No evaluation yet — that's Phase 2.

Socratic Exploration

Use question themes (not rigid categories) to explore the space. Adapt to what the user knows and doesn't know.

See REFERENCE.md for question themes with example prompts.

Themes: Problem Space, Assumptions, Constraints, Alternatives, Success Criteria, Anti-Goals.

Seed Idea Nurturing (MUST)

When the user can't answer a question:

• Don't skip it — explore it together
• Propose possible answers: "It could be X, Y, or Z. Which resonates?"
• Use agent findings to inform: "Based on what the searcher found, X seems likely because..."
• Mark as "Discovered during brainstorm" in the artifact

Direction Generation (MUST)

1. Ask the user what directions they see (MUST)
2. Propose additional directions informed by agents and codebase (MUST)
3. For each direction, sketch a 2-3 sentence "what this looks like" vision
4. Show progress: "Direction N explored. M agent dispatches so far."
5. Enforce minimum 3 directions (Critical Rule 5) before allowing Phase 2

Delegation: If user says "you decide" on direction generation, propose and justify. For direction selection (Phase 3), always require explicit user choice — delegation not accepted for the final pick.

Anti-Goals (MUST)

Explicitly ask: "What do you NOT want? What outcomes would make this a failure?" Anti-goals constrain the design space and prevent wasted exploration.

Phase gate: "Before we evaluate — any directions to add or revisit?" User confirms ready. Do NOT proceed to Evaluate until confirmed.

Done when: 3+ directions generated, anti-goals captured, user confirms ready.

---

Phase 2: Evaluate (MUST)

Purpose: Honest assessment of each direction's strengths and weaknesses.

Tradeoff Analysis (MUST)

For each direction:

• Strengths: What it gets right
• Weaknesses: What it gets wrong or leaves unresolved
• Assumptions: What must be true for this to work
• Feasibility: Given current codebase, constraints, and capabilities

Contrarian Checkpoint (MUST — Critical Rule 3)

Before convergence, present a devil's advocate perspective on the leading direction(s). This is NOT optional.

"Before you choose — here's why [Direction A] might fail: [honest weaknesses]. And here's what [Direction B] gets right that A doesn't: [specific advantages]."

If the brainstorm is complex (4+ directions, unfamiliar domain): Dispatch a contrarian-challenger agent to stress-test the top 2 directions. Present its findings alongside your own assessment.

Anti-Goal Violation Check (MUST)

If a direction violates a stated anti-goal, flag it explicitly: "Direction A conflicts with anti-goal X. Proceed anyway or drop?"

Grounding Check (MUST)

If any direction references technology, patterns, or capabilities that haven't been verified, dispatch agents to confirm before evaluation. Never evaluate a direction built on unverified premises.

Show progress: "Evaluating direction N of M."

Done when: All directions evaluated, contrarian checkpoint presented, user ready to choose.

---

Phase 3: Converge (MUST)

Purpose: User selects a direction with full awareness of tradeoffs.

1. Present directions with evaluation summary (MUST)
2. User selects direction (MUST — AI does not choose)
3. Capture rationale: "Why this direction over the others?" (MUST)
4. Capture open questions: "What still needs research or deeper planning?" (MUST)

Hybrid directions: User may combine elements from multiple directions. If so, sketch the hybrid and confirm: "So the direction is: [synthesis]. Correct?"

Done when: Direction chosen, rationale captured, open questions listed.

---

Phase 4: Crystallize (MUST)

Purpose: Produce the BRAINSTORM.md artifact and route to next action.

1. Write BRAINSTORM.md to .research/<topic-slug>/ (MUST)
2. Display inline in conversation (MUST — primary output)
3. Convergence-loop verify (MUST) — run CL quick preset on BRAINSTORM.md claims about codebase state, existing systems, and feasibility. As many passes as needed to converge. Present T20 tally (Confirmed/Corrected/Extended/New) — standard convergence-loop protocol, see /convergence-loop skill for definitions. Fix any failed claims before presenting.
4. Present routing menu (MUST):

Brainstorm complete. What next?
1. /deep-plan  — plan implementation of chosen direction
2. /deep-research — investigate open questions (adapter: pass BRAINSTORM.md
   chosen direction + open questions as the research topic; the research
   output dir should use the same slug as the brainstorm)
3. Both — research first, then plan
4. Direct implementation — direction is clear enough, just build it
5. Save and continue later — state preserved for resume

See REFERENCE.md for the BRAINSTORM.md template.

Retro (SHOULD): "Did the brainstorm surface anything unexpected? What would you do differently?" Save to state file process_feedback.

Done when: BRAINSTORM.md written and verified, routing presented, user routes to next action.

---

Guard Rails

• Premature convergence: Block convergence with < 3 directions explored. "We've only explored N directions. Worth considering more before choosing?"
• Assumption surfacing: Every direction MUST state key assumptions. No hidden premises.
• Scope explosion: If directions exceed ~7, pause and cluster into themes.
• Grounding check: Dispatch agents for any unverified claims before evaluation.
• AI agreement bias: The contrarian checkpoint exists specifically to counter this. If every direction looks great, something is being missed.
• Contradiction detection: If user statements in later phases conflict with earlier ones, flag immediately and resolve before proceeding.
• Disengagement: Save state, list what's been explored, offer resume.

---

Compaction Resilience

• State file: .claude/state/brainstorm.<topic-slug>.state.json
• Update: After every phase boundary
• Recovery: Re-invoke /brainstorm <same-topic> to resume
• Schema: See REFERENCE.md for state file schema
• Artifacts as checkpoints: BRAINSTORM.md persists even if state is lost

---

Integration

• Upstream: using-superpowers routes here for creative work in this project
• Downstream: /deep-plan (BRAINSTORM.md consumed by Phase 0), /deep-research (open questions become research topics)
• Neighbors: /deep-plan (plans chosen direction), /deep-research (investigates open questions), /convergence-loop (Phase 4 verification)
• Agents used: deep-research-searcher (domain investigation), Explore (codebase), contrarian-challenger (stress-test, conditional)
• References: REFERENCE.md (templates, themes, schema)

---

Version History

Version	Date	Description
1.1	2026-04-01	Skill-audit: 18 decisions — phase gates, CL, guard rails, UX
1.0	2026-04-01	Initial creation from 17-decision skill-creator discovery