菜单
Show the current research pipeline status for the active project, or display the pipeline guide for a specific project type. Reads the research spec, research journal, and active plans to determine phase, scores, and next steps.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Sync the overleaf/ folder with the current content of paper/. Copies all LaTeX source, figures, tables, appendix, and bibliography. Puts the model section as overleaf/model.tex (top-level) for easy coauthor access. Run whenever paper/ changes and you want to push to Overleaf.
RA onboarding audit — explore all project folders and code, inspect data files directly, and produce a structured project-state document that enables a clean restart. Use at the start of a project hand-off or when picking up work from multiple prior contributors.
Full bibliography audit for an academic paper. Verifies every citation is (1) structurally correct in the .bib file, (2) actually cited in the paper, and (3) a real publication — author names, year, journal, and title verified via web search. Flags hallucinated or inaccurate references.
Design identification strategy by dispatching the causal-strategist agent (proposer) and identification-critic agent (critic). Produces strategy memo, pseudo-code, robustness plan, and falsification tests. Use when asked to "identify the effect", "design the strategy", or "write the strategy memo".
Show current context status and session health. Use to check how much context has been used, whether auto-compact is approaching, and what state will be preserved.
Validate replication package by dispatching the replication-verifier agent in submission mode (checks 1-10). Runs master script, cross-references tables and figures against paper, verifies README completeness for AEA Data Editor compliance. Use before data deposit or journal submission.
| name | pipeline-status |
| description | Show the current research pipeline status for the active project, or display the pipeline guide for a specific project type. Reads the research spec, research journal, and active plans to determine phase, scores, and next steps. |
| author | Claude Code Academic Workflow |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| argument-hint | [optional: empirical | theory | structural | empirical+theory] |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Glob","Bash"] |
Show where you are in the cloco research pipeline, with phase statuses, scores, and the next command to run.
Usage:
/pipeline-status — dashboard for active project (or Getting Started if none)/pipeline-status empirical — pipeline guide for empirical projects/pipeline-status theory — pipeline guide for theory projects/pipeline-status structural — pipeline guide for structural projects/pipeline-status empirical+theory — pipeline guide for combined projectsCheck $ARGUMENTS:
$ARGUMENTS is non-empty and matches one of empirical, theory,
structural, empirical+theory → Mode C (static type guide)ls quality_reports/research_spec_*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1
2a. Read the research spec:
cat quality_reports/research_spec_*.md 2>/dev/null | head -60
Extract: project_name, project_type (empirical/theory/structural/empirical+theory).
If project_type is absent, default to empirical.
2b. Read the research journal:
cat quality_reports/research_journal.md 2>/dev/null
Parse all entries for **Phase:** and **Score:** fields.
Group by phase. A component is "done" when its score >= 80.
The last entry gives the last_action summary (agent + score).
2c. Find the active plan:
ls -lt .claude/plans/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1
Phases (in order): Discovery → Strategy → Execution → Peer Review → Submission
A phase is done when ALL its required components for the project type are done (score >= 80).
| Phase | Empirical components | Theory components | Structural components | Empirical+Theory components |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery | Literature (academic-librarian) + Data (explorer) | Literature only | Literature + Data | Literature + Data |
| Strategy | Causal strategy (causal-strategist) | Theory model (econ-finance-theorist) | Structural model (structural-estimation-expert) | Theory model + Causal strategy |
| Execution | Code (Coder/debugger) + Paper draft | Paper draft only | Code + Paper draft | Code + Paper draft |
| Peer Review | blind-peer-referee (avg >= 80) | blind-peer-referee (avg >= 80) | blind-peer-referee (avg >= 80) | blind-peer-referee (avg >= 80) |
| Submission | replication-verifier PASS + overall >= 95 | overall >= 95 | replication-verifier PASS + overall >= 95 | replication-verifier PASS + overall >= 95 |
Current phase = first phase that is NOT done. If all phases done → current phase = Submission (completed).
Compute the weighted aggregate using components that have scores. Weights by project type (from scoring-protocol.md):
| Component | Empirical | Theory | Structural | Empirical+Theory |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Literature | 10% | 15% | 10% | 10% |
| Data quality | 10% | — | 10% | 10% |
| Theory model | — | 40% | 15% | 10% |
| Identification | 25% | — | — | 20% |
| Structural estimation | — | — | 20% | — |
| Code quality | 15% | — | 15% | 15% |
| Paper quality (avg referees) | 25% | 30% | 20% | 25% |
| Manuscript polish | 10% | 15% | 5% | 5% |
| Replication | 5% | — | 5% | 5% |
Renormalize if components are missing (no score yet).
| Current Phase | Empirical | Theory | Structural | Empirical+Theory |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery | /lit-review [topic] | /lit-review [topic] | /lit-review [topic] | /lit-review [topic] |
| Strategy | /identify_reducedform [question] | /theory-model [topic] | /theory-model [topic] | /theory-model [topic] |
| Execution | /data-analysis [dataset] | /draft-paper [section] | /data-analysis [dataset] | /data-analysis [dataset] |
| Peer Review | /review-paper [file] | /review-paper [file] | /review-paper [file] | /review-paper [file] |
| Submission | /submit [journal] | /submit [journal] | /submit [journal] | /submit [journal] |
Print this ASCII dashboard (adapt to actual data):
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ CLOCO RESEARCH PIPELINE STATUS ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Project: [project_name] ║
║ Type: [project_type] Phase N of 5 ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ PIPELINE ║
║ ║
║ [✅|▶|○] 1 · Discovery ║
║ ├─ Literature review academic-librarian XX/100 ║
║ └─ Data discovery explorer XX/100 ║
║ ║
║ [✅|▶|○] 2 · Strategy [← YOU ARE HERE] ║
║ ├─ [strategy component] [status] ║
║ └─ Econometrics review [status] ║
║ ║
║ [✅|▶|○] 3 · Execution [locked?] ║
║ ├─ Code analysis debugger [score] ║
║ └─ Paper draft proofreader [score] ║
║ ║
║ [✅|▶|○] 4 · Peer Review [locked?] ║
║ └─ Blind peer review referee avg [score] ║
║ ║
║ [✅|▶|○] 5 · Submission [locked?] ║
║ └─ Replication package verifier [PASS/FAIL] ║
║ ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ LAST ACTION ║
║ [last journal entry summary — agent, score, date] ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ NEXT STEP ║
║ → /[skill] [hint] ║
║ Runs: [agents dispatched] ║
║ Required: 80/100 to unlock [next phase] ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ QUALITY GATES ║
║ Commit ≥80: [✅|○] PR ≥90: [✅|○] Submit ≥95: [✅|○] ║
║ Overall score: [XX/100 or N/A] ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Phase icons: ✅ = done (all components >= 80), ▶ = current, ○ = locked
Component status: show score (e.g. 87/100) or not started or in progress
Print this banner:
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ CLOCO — GETTING STARTED ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ No active research project found. ║
║ ║
║ Start a project: ║
║ /new-project [topic] Full pipeline: idea → paper ║
║ /interview-me [topic] Interview → research spec ║
║ ║
║ Or jump to a standalone task: ║
║ /lit-review [topic] Literature search ║
║ /find-data [question] Data discovery ║
║ /draft-paper [section] Write paper sections ║
║ /review-code [file] Code quality audit ║
║ /proofread [file] Manuscript review ║
║ /review-paper [file] Simulated peer review ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
/pipeline-status empirical)╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ CLOCO PIPELINE GUIDE — EMPIRICAL PROJECT ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Phase 1 · Discovery ║
║ /interview-me [topic] → Research spec + project_type ║
║ /lit-review [topic] → academic-librarian + editor ║
║ /find-data [question] → explorer + data-quality-surveyor║
║ ║
║ Phase 2 · Strategy ║
║ /identify_reducedform [question] ║
║ → causal-strategist + critic ║
║ Required: 80/100 to advance (weight: 25% of score) ║
║ ║
║ Phase 3 · Execution ║
║ /data-analysis [dataset] → Coder + debugger ║
║ /draft-paper [section] → economics-paper-writer ║
║ /proofread [file] → academic-proofreader ║
║ ║
║ Phase 4 · Peer Review ║
║ /review-paper [file] → 2× blind-peer-referee ║
║ ║
║ Phase 5 · Submission ║
║ /target-journal [paper] → journal selection ║
║ /audit-replication [dir]→ replication-verifier ║
║ /submit [journal] → final gate ≥95 ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Scoring weights: Identification 25%, Paper 25%, Code 15%, ║
║ Lit 10%, Data 10%, Polish 10%, Replication 5% ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
/pipeline-status theory)╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ CLOCO PIPELINE GUIDE — THEORY PROJECT ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Phase 1 · Discovery ║
║ /interview-me [topic] → Research spec + project_type ║
║ /lit-review [topic] → academic-librarian + editor ║
║ ║
║ Phase 2 · Strategy ║
║ /theory-model [topic] → econ-finance-theorist + critic ║
║ Required: 80/100 to advance (weight: 40% of score) ║
║ ║
║ Phase 3 · Execution ║
║ /draft-paper [section] → economics-paper-writer ║
║ /proofread [file] → academic-proofreader ║
║ ║
║ Phase 4 · Peer Review ║
║ /review-paper [file] → 2× blind-peer-referee ║
║ ║
║ Phase 5 · Submission ║
║ /target-journal [paper] → journal selection ║
║ /submit [journal] → final gate ≥95 ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ NOTE: Theory projects skip data, code, and replication. ║
║ Scoring weights: Theory model 40%, Paper 30%, Lit 15%, ║
║ Manuscript polish 15% ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
/pipeline-status structural)╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ CLOCO PIPELINE GUIDE — STRUCTURAL PROJECT ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Phase 1 · Discovery ║
║ /interview-me [topic] → Research spec + project_type ║
║ /lit-review [topic] → academic-librarian + editor ║
║ /find-data [question] → explorer + data-quality-surveyor║
║ ║
║ Phase 2 · Strategy ║
║ /theory-model [topic] → econ-finance-theorist + critic ║
║ /structural-estimation → structural-expert + critic ║
║ Required: 80/100 to advance (weight: 35% of score) ║
║ ║
║ Phase 3 · Execution ║
║ /data-analysis [dataset] → Coder + debugger ║
║ /draft-paper [section] → economics-paper-writer ║
║ /proofread [file] → academic-proofreader ║
║ ║
║ Phase 4 · Peer Review ║
║ /review-paper [file] → 2× blind-peer-referee ║
║ ║
║ Phase 5 · Submission ║
║ /target-journal [paper] → journal selection ║
║ /audit-replication [dir]→ replication-verifier ║
║ /submit [journal] → final gate ≥95 ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Scoring: Structural 20%, Theory model 15%, Paper 20%, ║
║ Code 15%, Lit 10%, Data 10%, Polish 5%, Replication 5% ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
/pipeline-status empirical+theory)╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ CLOCO PIPELINE GUIDE — EMPIRICAL+THEORY PROJECT ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Phase 1 · Discovery ║
║ /interview-me [topic] → Research spec + project_type ║
║ /lit-review [topic] → academic-librarian + editor ║
║ /find-data [question] → explorer + data-quality-surveyor║
║ ║
║ Phase 2 · Strategy ║
║ /theory-model [topic] → econ-finance-theorist + critic ║
║ /identify_reducedform → causal-strategist + critic ║
║ Required: 80/100 to advance (weights: 10% + 20%) ║
║ ║
║ Phase 3 · Execution ║
║ /data-analysis [dataset] → Coder + debugger ║
║ /draft-paper [section] → economics-paper-writer ║
║ /proofread [file] → academic-proofreader ║
║ ║
║ Phase 4 · Peer Review ║
║ /review-paper [file] → 2× blind-peer-referee ║
║ ║
║ Phase 5 · Submission ║
║ /target-journal [paper] → journal selection ║
║ /audit-replication [dir]→ replication-verifier ║
║ /submit [journal] → final gate ≥95 ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Scoring: Identification 20%, Paper 25%, Code 15%, Lit 10%, ║
║ Data 10%, Theory 10%, Polish 5%, Replication 5% ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
quality_reports/research_journal.md — the journal is
the single source of truth for pipeline progressnot startedN/A/pipeline-status is safe to run at any time; it is read-only