菜单
Compare two artifacts for semantic and behavioral equivalence.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Shared protocol for review-shaped actions, authorization scope, defect routing, L2 audit handling, and local-only capture.
Use when the user asks to "test TPC-H", "check compliance", "review architecture", "run quality checks", "check binaries", "test dialect translation", "compare implementations", "run live platform tests", or "plan and execute" a benchmark feature.
Use for "commit code", "review code", "fix lint/type error", "improve performance", "compare code", "shrink code", "generate spec from code", "investigate code", "debug an error", "triage a bug", "iterate to green", or "create handoff prompt".
Use when the user asks to "create documentation", "build docs", "review docs", "compare documents", "compress docs", "adversarial review docs", or "commit docs".
Use when the user asks to "sync skills", "set up skill-sync", "check skill status", "validate skills", "preview skill changes", "diagnose skills", "pin a skill", "unpin a skill", "prune skills", or "promote skill changes".
Use when the user asks to "run tests", "create tests", "fix failing test", "add test coverage", "fix slow tests", or "commit test changes".
| name | compare-framework |
| description | Compare two artifacts for semantic and behavioral equivalence. |
Compare behavior, contracts, and relationships; do not compare wording alone.
| Score | Meaning |
|---|---|
| >=0.95 | Equivalent |
| 0.85-0.94 | Mostly equivalent; review |
| 0.70-0.84 | Significant differences |
| <0.70 | Breaking/not equivalent |
Breaking contract changes halve the score; lost critical relationships multiply by 0.7.
Static comparison can miss runtime registration, reflection, external references, and behavior hidden behind indirection. Note confidence and any unverified assumptions.
