| name | wp-acf-and-content-modeling |
| description | WordPress ACF and content modeling review for Codex. Use when reviewing ACF field groups, CPT and taxonomy design, options pages, repeaters, flexible content, relationship fields, ACF JSON sync, and meta-heavy content architecture. |
Codex WordPress ACF and Content Modeling Review
Purpose
Use this skill when Codex needs to review whether a WordPress project modeled its content well, not just whether the templates currently render.
Focus Areas
- CPT, taxonomy, and field-boundary decisions
- ACF field groups, naming, defaults, and conditional logic
- Repeater and flexible-content fit
- Relationship fields and return-format consistency
- Options pages and global settings design
- ACF JSON sync and environment drift
- Meta-query and storage-performance implications
Workflow
- Inventory the real entities, taxonomies, options pages, and field groups.
- Check whether the model uses the right boundary: CPT vs taxonomy vs field.
- Review ACF field-group structure, naming, and editor ergonomics.
- Flag repeaters, flexible content, and relationship fields used beyond their safe role.
- Escalate query/storage risks when the model pushes too much onto
postmeta.
- Report findings with severity, file references, subsystem notes, and suggested redesigns.
Reference Files
Load only the references you need from:
../../claude-skills/wp-acf-and-content-modeling/references/content-modeling-guide.md
../../claude-skills/wp-acf-and-content-modeling/references/acf-json-and-field-group-guide.md
../../claude-skills/wp-acf-and-content-modeling/references/meta-query-and-performance.md
Output
- Group findings by severity
- Distinguish schema blockers from editorial-quality improvements
- Call out taxonomy-vs-meta and entity-vs-field decisions explicitly
- Suggest follow-up in performance, REST, or block-review domains where relevant