一键导入
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Use before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
| name | test-driven-development |
| description | Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code |
Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass.
Core principle: If you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.
Violating the letter of the rules is violating the spirit of the rules.
Always:
Exceptions (ask your human partner):
Thinking "skip TDD just this once"? Stop. That's rationalization.
NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST
Write code before the test? Delete it. Start over.
No exceptions:
Implement fresh from tests. Period.
Write one minimal test showing what should happen.
Good example:
test('retries failed operations 3 times', async () => {
let attempts = 0;
const operation = () => {
attempts++;
if (attempts < 3) throw new Error('fail');
return 'success';
};
const result = await retryOperation(operation);
expect(result).toBe('success');
expect(attempts).toBe(3);
});
Clear name, tests real behavior, one thing.
Requirements:
MANDATORY. Never skip.
npm test path/to/test.test.ts
Confirm:
Test passes? You're testing existing behavior. Fix test.
Write simplest code to pass the test. Don't add features, refactor other code, or "improve" beyond the test.
MANDATORY.
Confirm:
Test fails? Fix code, not test.
After green only:
Keep tests green. Don't add behavior.
"I'll write tests after to verify it works"
Tests written after code pass immediately. Passing immediately proves nothing—might test wrong thing, might test implementation not behavior, might miss edge cases.
Test-first forces you to see the test fail, proving it actually tests something.
"Deleting X hours of work is wasteful"
Sunk cost fallacy. The time is already gone. Working code without real tests is technical debt.
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Too simple to test" | Simple code breaks. Test takes 30 seconds. |
| "I'll test after" | Tests passing immediately prove nothing. |
| "Already manually tested" | Ad-hoc ≠ systematic. No record, can't re-run. |
| "Deleting X hours is wasteful" | Sunk cost fallacy. Keeping unverified code is technical debt. |
| "Need to explore first" | Fine. Throw away exploration, start with TDD. |
| "TDD will slow me down" | TDD faster than debugging. |
All of these mean: Delete code. Start over with TDD.
Before marking work complete:
Can't check all boxes? You skipped TDD. Start over.
Production code → test exists and failed first
Otherwise → not TDD
No exceptions without your human partner's permission.