一键导入
review-decision
Review a decision record via @decision-critic for an independent challenge (read-only; returns PASS / PASS_WITH_RISKS / REWORK).
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Review a decision record via @decision-critic for an independent challenge (read-only; returns PASS / PASS_WITH_RISKS / REWORK).
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Review open PR/MR and publish findings.
Interactive decision planning session to prepare canonical context, classification, rigor, and decision rights for /write-decision. Supports all decision types (ADR/PDR/TDR/BDR/ODR).
Generate a Decision Record (ADR/PDR/TDR/BDR/ODR) from planning context, rendered proportionally by rigor.
Run the Definition of Ready gate.
Run ADOS project inception
Classify and apply accepted PR/MR review feedback.
| name | review-decision |
| description | Review a decision record via @decision-critic for an independent challenge (read-only; returns PASS / PASS_WITH_RISKS / REWORK). |
| model | sonnet |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Write","Edit","Glob","Grep","Bash","WebFetch","mcp__*"] |
User invocation:
/review-decision
where <ID> is the decision record identifier (e.g., ADR-0001) or the record's number for the relevant type.
This command is read-only by default: it produces a review artifact/verdict in its response and does NOT write, edit, stage, or commit any file. The caller decides whether and how to act on the findings (e.g., feed them back to @decision-advisor via /write-decision update, or escalate to a human reviewer for R3).
<record_resolution>
ADR-0001 → type ADR, number 0001). If only digits are given, default the type to ADR only when the type is genuinely unspecified.doc/decisions/<TYPE>-<number>-*.md.NOT_FOUND with guidance to run /plan-decision + /write-decision first, and stop.
</record_resolution><independence_note>
State at the top of the review which independence level applies (per @decision-critic's honesty framing):
Regardless of the verdict, R3 decisions ALWAYS require a human reviewer. A PASS from the critic does not authorize an R3 decision. </independence_note>
<output_contract> Return a structured review artifact (in the response only — no file writes):
REVIEWED | NOT_FOUND | NEEDS_INPUT<TYPE>-<number> and path reviewed