菜单
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements. Dispatches a code-reviewer subagent with crafted context.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | requesting-code-review |
| description | Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements. Dispatches a code-reviewer subagent with crafted context. |
Dispatch a code reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.
Core principle: Review early, review often.
Complements, does not replace: in a team workflow the Phase 4
team-testerand Phase 5security-revieware the gated audits, and Claude Code's built-in/review+/security-reviewcover the diff. Use this skill for lightweight, on-demand reviews between tasks or before a merge gate.
Mandatory:
Optional but valuable:
1. Get git SHAs:
BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
2. Dispatch code reviewer subagent:
Dispatch a general-purpose subagent, filling the template at resources/code-reviewer.md.
Placeholders:
{DESCRIPTION} — brief summary of what you built{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS} — what it should do (plan file path under _docs/, task text, or requirements){BASE_SHA} — starting commit{HEAD_SHA} — ending commit3. Act on feedback:
[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]
Let me request code review before proceeding.
BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1)
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
[Dispatch code reviewer subagent]
DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types
PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from _docs/active/planning/<date>/<topic>-plan.md
BASE_SHA: a7981ec
HEAD_SHA: 3df7661
[Subagent returns]:
Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests
Issues:
Important: Missing progress indicators
Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval
Assessment: Ready to proceed
[Fix progress indicators] → [Continue to Task 3]
Never:
If the reviewer is wrong:
See template at: resources/code-reviewer.md
Use BEFORE any solo/low-blast creative work — designing a feature, component, behavior change, or this harness itself — to turn an idea into an approved design through a lightweight collaborative dialogue. The solo counterpart to /team-brainstorm (which owns multi-file / cross-cutting / product / architecturally-uncertain work). Harness-owned; do NOT invoke any external brainstorming skill.
6-phase verification system (+ an opt-in human comprehension quiz gate) with checkpoint support and pass@k metrics. Use in Phase 4-5 of team workflow, before creating PRs, or after completing feature implementations. Covers build, type check, lint, test, security scan, diff review, a human-understanding gate, checkpoints, and evaluation metrics.
Multi-agent team workflow orchestration with 5 phases, escalation loops, and TDD enforcement. Use when /team or /team-run commands are invoked. Coordinates Team Leader, Architects (FE/BE/Infra), UI/UX Master, Designers (TDD developers), and Testers through Planning → UI/UX → Gate → Implementation → Verification → Final Review.
Model routing (incl. per-agent Workflow / ultracode routing), effort levels, context efficiency, and compaction strategy. Use when spawning agents, authoring Workflow fan-outs, selecting models, choosing effort levels, or managing context window pressure.
Git worktree management, cascade method for multiple instances, and scaling guidelines. Use when planning parallel agent work, managing worktrees, or deciding when to scale instances.
Analyze project structure, conventions, and patterns to generate a project profile. Use when /team-init is invoked or when team agents need to understand the codebase. Scans package.json, config files, source code patterns, and test setup to produce structured profiles in .claude/project-profile/.