M&A deal structuring and term sheet design. USE THIS SKILL when the user asks about deal structure, term sheet, purchase agreement terms, asset deal vs. stock deal, earnout, escrow, reps and warranties, indemnification, locked box, completion accounts, consideration mix, seller note, MAC clause, material adverse change, non-compete, conditions precedent, purchase price mechanism, closing conditions, merger agreement, or SPA terms. Also trigger when asked to draft or review M&A transaction terms.
M&A deal structuring and term sheet design. USE THIS SKILL when the user asks about deal structure, term sheet, purchase agreement terms, asset deal vs. stock deal, earnout, escrow, reps and warranties, indemnification, locked box, completion accounts, consideration mix, seller note, MAC clause, material adverse change, non-compete, conditions precedent, purchase price mechanism, closing conditions, merger agreement, or SPA terms. Also trigger when asked to draft or review M&A transaction terms.
M&A Deal Structuring & Term Sheet Design
Required Inputs
Transaction Overview: Buyer, target, deal rationale, and indicative valuation range.
Buyer Type: Strategic acquirer or financial sponsor (PE fund).
Target Entity Type: C-corp, S-corp, LLC, partnership, or international entity.
Consideration Budget: Available cash, appetite for stock issuance, and debt capacity.
Key Sensitivities: Seller priorities (cash at close, tax efficiency, retention of upside) and buyer priorities (risk allocation, price protection, integration flexibility).
Execution Steps
1. Deal Structure Selection
Choose the legal structure for the transaction. Each has materially different tax, liability, and operational consequences.
Structure Comparison Table
Dimension
Asset Purchase
Stock Purchase
Statutory Merger
What transfers
Selected assets and liabilities
Entire legal entity (shares)
Target merges into buyer or sub
Successor liability
Generally no (except specific carve-outs)
Yes — all liabilities transfer
Yes — surviving entity assumes all
Tax to seller (C-corp)
Double tax (corporate + shareholder)
Single tax at shareholder level
Single tax (if structured properly)
Tax to seller (S-corp/LLC)
Single tax at owner level
Single tax at owner level
Single tax at owner level
Buyer tax benefit
Step-up in asset basis (higher future D&A)
No step-up (unless 338(h)(10) election)
No step-up (unless 338(h)(10))
Contract assignment
Requires consent per contract
Automatic (unless change-of-control clause)
Automatic by operation of law
Employee transfer
New employment offers required
Employees remain with entity
Employees remain with surviving entity
Third-party consents
Extensive (each asset/contract)
Limited (change-of-control only)
Limited
Minority shareholders
N/A
Must acquire 100% or deal with holdouts
Squeeze-out via appraisal rights
Regulatory complexity
Lower
Moderate
Higher (board + shareholder approvals)
Best for
Buying specific divisions; avoiding liabilities
Clean companies; speed to close
Public targets; tax-efficient combinations
Decision Framework
Score each factor 1-5 based on deal circumstances:
Factor
Favors Asset Deal
Favors Stock Deal
Favors Merger
Score
Buyer wants tax step-up
5
1
1
Seller wants single tax layer
1
5
5
Significant contingent liabilities
5
1
1
Many non-assignable contracts
1
5
5
Target has valuable NOLs
1
4
4
Minority shareholder squeeze-out needed
1
1
5
Partial acquisition (division/unit)
5
1
1
Speed to close priority
2
4
3
Total
Recommend the structure with the highest total score. Document trade-offs for the runner-up.
2. Consideration Design
Consideration Types
Type
Description
Seller Impact
Buyer Impact
Cash
Immediate payment at close
Certainty; immediate tax event
Cash outflow; possibly debt-funded
Stock
Buyer equity issued to seller
Tax deferral possible (tax-free reorg); retains upside
No cash outflow; dilution to existing shareholders