一键导入
codex-review
Get an independent GPT review via Codex CLI. Use when you want a second opinion on code, plans, or architecture from a different AI model.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Get an independent GPT review via Codex CLI. Use when you want a second opinion on code, plans, or architecture from a different AI model.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Autonomous build loop — debate, plan, implement, review, fix — all in one session with GPT review.
Bidirectional AI slop scanner — Claude + GPT independently analyze, then debate disagreements.
Real Claude vs GPT multi-round debate. Use when you need a second opinion, want to debate architecture decisions, or evaluate competing approaches with multi-model collaboration.
Send execution plans to GPT for structured review via Codex CLI. Use when you have a written plan and want independent validation before implementation.
| name | codex-review |
| description | Get an independent GPT review via Codex CLI. Use when you want a second opinion on code, plans, or architecture from a different AI model. |
| user-invocable | true |
/codex-review <file, glob, or description of what to review>
Sends content to GPT via codemoot review for an independent review with session persistence. GPT has full codebase access and reviews are tracked in SQLite. Uses your ChatGPT subscription — zero API cost.
When the user invokes /codex-review, follow these steps:
Before sending to GPT, gather relevant context so GPT understands the project:
CLAUDE.md or README.md exists — read the first 200 lines for project overview.claude/settings.json or similar config existsThis context will be included in the prompt to reduce false positives.
If the user specifies a file or glob:
codemoot review <file-or-glob> --focus all
If the user specifies a diff:
codemoot review --diff HEAD~3..HEAD
If the user gives a freeform description:
codemoot review --prompt "PROJECT CONTEXT: <context from step 1>
REVIEW TASK: <user's description>
Evaluate on: Correctness, Completeness, Quality, Security, Feasibility.
For security findings, verify by reading the actual code before flagging.
Provide SCORE: X/10 and VERDICT: APPROVED or NEEDS_REVISION"
For presets:
codemoot review <target> --preset security-audit
codemoot review <target> --preset quick-scan
codemoot review <target> --preset performance
The command outputs JSON to stdout. Parse it and present as clean markdown:
## GPT Review Results
**Score**: X/10 | **Verdict**: APPROVED/NEEDS_REVISION
### Findings
- [CRITICAL] file:line — description
- [WARNING] file:line — description
### GPT's Full Analysis
<review text>
Session: <sessionId> | Tokens: <usage> | Duration: <durationMs>ms
Ask if user wants to fix and re-review. If yes:
codemoot review again — session resume gives GPT context of prior reviewreview field is capped to 2KB to prevent terminal crashes. Full text is stored in session_events.