architecture-design

name	architecture-design
description	Architecture and design-review skill covering Domain-Driven Design (DDD), Clean Architecture, SOLID, GoF design patterns, and event-driven architecture, with concrete Python 3.12+ and TypeScript 5.x idioms. Use whenever a structural design decision is in play — designing a new system or module, reviewing code for structural quality, choosing between architectural approaches, refactoring toward cleaner layering, placing business logic, defining module boundaries, evaluating aggregates and bounded contexts, applying SOLID, selecting a design pattern, or deciding when (and when not) to adopt event sourcing, CQRS, or event-driven messaging. Trigger on phrases like "design a system", "architecture review", "is this clean", "where does this logic belong", "aggregate", "bounded context", "hexagonal", "ports and adapters", "SOLID violation", "anemic domain model", "code smell", "refactor this", "use case layer", "event sourcing", "CQRS", or any moment a developer asks whether a piece of code is in the right place.
license	MIT
metadata	{"version":"1.0.0","category":"software-engineering","tags":"ddd, clean-architecture, solid, design-patterns, event-driven, python, typescript"}

Architecture & Design

Guide for designing and reviewing systems through five lenses — Domain-Driven Design, Clean Architecture, SOLID, GoF patterns, and event-driven architecture — with concrete Python 3.12+ and TypeScript 5.x idioms. Deep content is organized in references/; this file is the router.

Core principle. Good architecture maximizes the number of decisions not made and easily changed. The test of a design is how cheaply the system can absorb tomorrow's requirement, not how elegantly it handles today's. Ref: Martin, Clean Architecture, Ch. 15.

---

Two workflows

Route based on user intent.

A. Designing (greenfield or new module)

Follow the six-phase sequence. Do them in order — each phase produces inputs the next one needs.

1. Strategic DDD — Identify bounded contexts, establish the ubiquitous language, map context relationships. See references/ddd.md § Strategic. Do this before picking a framework or database.
2. Tactical DDD — Model aggregates, entities, value objects, domain events within each context. See references/ddd.md § Tactical. Aggregate boundaries dictate transaction boundaries.
3. Clean Architecture layers — Place concepts into domain / application / interface / infrastructure. Apply the Dependency Rule. See references/clean-architecture.md.
4. Tactical patterns — Choose repository, specification, factory, and other patterns to implement the design. See references/design-patterns.md.
5. Integration style — Sync RPC, async messaging, event sourcing, CQRS? See references/event-driven.md.
6. Language idioms — Translate into Python (references/python.md) or TypeScript (references/typescript.md).

B. Evaluating (existing system / PR review)

Walk references/evaluation-rubric.md section by section. It produces a scored report covering: domain model health, layer integrity, SOLID adherence, pattern usage, and integration style.

For a fast triage before a deeper review, use the Five-question smoke test:

1. Is there a domain model, or just CRUD on anemic classes?
2. Do inner layers import from outer layers anywhere?
3. What are the top three SOLID violations?
4. Any singletons, service locators, or god classes in disguise?
5. Any synchronous call chain deeper than three services?

If any answer is bad, the system has a structural problem that the referenced document diagnoses in detail.

---

The five lenses: when to load which reference

Lens	Load when…	Reference
DDD	modeling a domain, choosing aggregate boundaries, fighting anemic models, defining bounded contexts, aligning code with domain-expert language	references/ddd.md
Clean Architecture	deciding where logic belongs, drawing layer boundaries, auditing dependency direction, evaluating framework coupling, setting up ports & adapters	references/clean-architecture.md
SOLID	reviewing a class, auditing interfaces, diagnosing rigidity, untangling "shotgun surgery" changes, designing for extensibility	references/solid.md
Design Patterns	a recurring structural problem appears, or a team is reaching for a specific named pattern and you need to validate or challenge the choice	references/design-patterns.md
Event-Driven	services exchange messages, CQRS or event sourcing is proposed, eventual consistency is on the table, sagas/orchestration come up	references/event-driven.md

Language-specific reference files load when translating any lens into code:

• references/python.md — Python 3.12+ idioms for value objects, aggregates, ports, DI, DTOs, pattern matching, Protocols.
• references/typescript.md — TypeScript 5.x idioms for branded types, discriminated unions, readonly modeling, ports, DI, satisfies.

---

Cross-cutting gotchas

These are the non-obvious traps that separate a good review from a mediocre one. Each is diagnosed deeper in its reference file.

Domain modeling

• Anemic domain model: classes with only getters/setters are data structures, not domain objects. Business logic ends up in services, which fragments invariants and reintroduces procedural code. Ref: Fowler, AnemicDomainModel essay; Vernon, IDDD, Ch. 7.
• Aggregate bloat: large aggregates serialize concurrent updates. Prefer small aggregates that reference others by ID. Ref: Vernon, IDDD, Ch. 10 ("Design Small Aggregates").
• One transaction, one aggregate: crossing aggregate boundaries in a single unit of work is a structural bug, not a performance optimization. Use domain events and a process manager instead.
• Ubiquitous language is not decorative: if the domain expert says "Member" and the code says "User", the mismatch is the bug. Rename.

Layering

• The Dependency Rule is one-way: source code dependencies point inward, toward higher-level policy. A single import from domain into infrastructure corrupts the whole architecture.
• Frameworks are details: Django models, SQLAlchemy entities, Express request objects, React components — all belong at the outermost ring. Your use cases should be framework-agnostic enough to run in a test harness.
• DTOs at every boundary: never leak ORM entities or domain objects past their layer. Translate.

SOLID

• SRP is about axes of change, not "doing one thing": a class has a single responsibility when it changes for one reason — that reason being one stakeholder or one axis of business concern.
• OCP does not mean "never modify": it means stable interfaces that let you add capabilities without cascading changes.
• LSP violations hide in isinstance / typeof checks: if callers have to inspect subtypes, the hierarchy is broken.
• DIP ≠ DI container: the principle is about dependency direction; the container is one mechanism. Constructor injection is enough.

Patterns

• Most singletons are global state in disguise. Use DI with a single instance instead. Ref: oop-knowledge skill § Composition vs Inheritance.
• Observer and publish-subscribe are not the same: Observer is in-process and synchronous; pub/sub is typically cross-process and asynchronous. Conflating them leads to subtle coupling.
• Repository per aggregate root, not per entity. One repository, one aggregate.

Event-driven

• Commands vs events: commands are intentions about the future and can be rejected; events are facts about the past and cannot. Never mix.
• Event sourcing ≠ event-driven architecture: you can use events to communicate between services without storing events as the source of truth, and vice versa.
• Schema evolution is the hard part. Version events from day one.
• Avoid implicit choreography for multi-step workflows: use an explicit saga / process manager for anything with compensating actions.

Python idioms (3.12+)

• Use @dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True) for value objects — __eq__ and __hash__ for free, immutability enforced.
• Prefer typing.Protocol (PEP 544) over abc.ABC for ports — structural typing fits ISP naturally.
• Use @override (PEP 698, 3.12+) on every overridden method — catches silent LSP drift.
• match statements replace type-switch idioms; pair with sealed-style unions (Literal, discriminated dataclass).
• Pydantic v2 for DTOs at layer boundaries (model_config = ConfigDict( frozen=True) to forbid mutation). Domain objects stay plain.

TypeScript idioms (5.x)

• Value objects: branded types + readonly: type UserId = string & { readonly __brand: unique symbol }.
• Domain states: discriminated unions beat class hierarchies for many cases. Exhaustive handling via never-check default.
• satisfies (4.9+) preserves literal types on constants.
• using (5.2+) for RAII-style resource management in infrastructure.
• import type at every layer boundary keeps the type graph separate from the value graph and plays nicely with erasableSyntaxOnly (5.8+) and Node's native type-stripping.

---

Output format for design decisions

When explaining or recommending a choice, use this shape. Makes intent auditable and gives maintainers a learning path.

### Design Decision: <short label>

**Recommended approach:** <one line>

**References:**
- *<Book>* — <Author>, Ch. <n>: <one-line takeaway>

**Trade-offs:**
- ✅ <advantage>
- ⚠️ <caveat or cost>

**Why not <alternative>:** <one line, ideally with reference>

For code artifacts, cite the pattern inline:

# Architecture: Hexagonal (Ports & Adapters)
# Ref: Percival & Gregory, Architecture Patterns with Python, Ch. 2
class OrderRepository(Protocol): ...

// Pattern: Strategy — runtime algorithm selection
// Ref: GoF, Design Patterns, p. 315
interface PricingStrategy { calculate(order: Order): Money; }

---

Before declaring "design done"

Run this checklist. Each item maps to a reference section for how to verify.

• Ubiquitous language is agreed with the domain expert; code reflects it literally (ddd.md § Ubiquitous Language).
• Aggregate boundaries justified (what invariant does this aggregate protect?); no transaction spans two aggregates (ddd.md § Aggregates).
• Dependency Rule verified — no inner layer imports an outer one (clean-architecture.md § The Dependency Rule). Enforce with an import-linter or depcheck in CI.
• No framework imports inside domain/ or application/ (clean-architecture.md § Frameworks Are Details).
• DTOs or mappers at every layer boundary; domain objects never cross into HTTP or persistence (clean-architecture.md § Boundaries).
• Every outer-to-inner dependency goes through a port (interface) owned by the inner layer (solid.md § DIP).
• Domain and application tests run without framework, DB, or network (clean-architecture.md § Testability).
• Integration style explicit and documented — sync vs async, commands vs events, which operations are eventually consistent (event-driven.md).
• Language idioms applied: value objects immutable, ports as Protocols/interfaces, DTOs at the edge (python.md or typescript.md).

---

Templates

Starter scaffolding for the most common structures lives in assets/templates/:

• assets/templates/aggregate-py.md — Python aggregate with value objects, invariants, domain events.
• assets/templates/aggregate-ts.md — TypeScript aggregate with branded IDs and discriminated state.
• assets/templates/use-case-py.md — Python use-case (interactor) with port injection.
• assets/templates/use-case-ts.md — TypeScript use-case with port injection.

Copy, rename, replace placeholders. Templates are starting points, not mandates — deviate when the domain calls for it, and note why.

---

Caveat on authoritative backing

When an O'Reilly MCP or equivalent book-search connector is available, search before making any consequential recommendation — one query either confirms the direction or surfaces an alternative. If no book search is connected, cite the canon from memory and mark the claim with [unverified] so the reader knows to double-check. The canonical references for this skill:

• Evans, Domain-Driven Design (2003).
• Vernon, Implementing Domain-Driven Design (2013).
• Khononov, Learning Domain-Driven Design (2021).
• Martin, Clean Architecture (2017), Clean Code (2008).
• Gamma, Helm, Johnson, Vlissides, Design Patterns (1994).
• Fowler, Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture (2002), Refactoring (2nd ed., 2018).
• Hohpe & Woolf, Enterprise Integration Patterns (2003).
• Percival & Gregory, Architecture Patterns with Python (2020).
• Richards & Ford, Fundamentals of Software Architecture (2020) and Software Architecture: The Hard Parts (2021).
• Ramalho, Fluent Python (2nd ed., 2022).