一键导入
next
Survey DAE project state at session start and recommend the next task; read-only advisory.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Survey DAE project state at session start and recommend the next task; read-only advisory.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Analyze changed code for complex, under-tested functions using CRAP scoring; produce ranked refactor and test recommendations.
Validate strict DAE quality gates after implementation-affecting changes, require machine-readable evidence, and write the quality-gate summary before completion or release.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "run mutation testing", "mutate my code", "kill mutants", "check test quality", "find surviving mutants", "verify test effectiveness with mutations", "run stryker", "run mutmut", "run pitest", "set up mutation testing", "how good are my tests", "are my tests catching bugs", or mentions mutation testing, mutation score, or mutant survival in the context of testing. It adds a third validation layer to the ATDD workflow: after acceptance tests verify WHAT and unit tests verify HOW, mutation testing verifies that tests actually catch bugs.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "build a feature", "implement a feature", "add functionality", "start development", "write acceptance tests", "write specs", "use ATDD", "use TDD with acceptance tests", or begins any feature implementation work. Also available as the atdd plugin's main skill. Enforces the Acceptance Test Driven Development workflow: write Given/When/Then specs before code, generate a project-specific test pipeline, and maintain two test streams.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "build a feature with a team", "use ATDD with agents", "create an ATDD team", "set up a team for ATDD", "orchestrate agents for ATDD", "use team-based development", "coordinate agents for feature development", "run the ATDD workflow with teammates", "add ATDD to my team", "extend my team with ATDD", "join the team with ATDD agents", "add spec-writer and reviewer to the team", or "add ATDD roles to the existing team". It orchestrates a six-phase ATDD workflow — spec writing, spec review, pipeline generation, implementation, refine, verify & harden — spawning a fresh agent per phase so no agent erodes across a long-running feature.
Analyze surviving mutants from a mutation testing run and write targeted unit tests to kill them. Re-runs mutations to confirm kills.
| name | next |
| description | Survey DAE project state at session start and recommend the next task; read-only advisory. |
The session-start skill — the human's re-entry point. Surveys every source of DAE state and answers one question: what should I pick up now?
Read-only and advisory. It changes nothing, produces no artifact, and emits no handoff (the recommendation is the whole output; a handoff would just restate it). This is a deliberate exception to the agentic-summary contract — next is a query, not a task that changes state.
next is the read-side bookend to session-summary: session-summary writes "here's where I left off, next tasks" at session end; next consumes that — and everything else — at session start.
Start of a session, or any "what now?" moment. Project-scope; surveys the whole project — there is no narrower scope.
Not for: loading context on a feature you've already chosen (prime-context); checking artifact consistency (consistency-check); a per-feature next-step (each skill's handoff already carries recommended_next).
Resolve the methodology root + manifest via ${PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/dae_resolve.py (see references/resolving.md). Then read, read-only:
features/*/feature.md (status) + progress.md (current checkpoint; whether it's blocked or ready to advance).engineer/consolidation.md if present (coverage backlog + triage order)features/*/ with status: parked; .engineer/discussions.loghandoffs/*.md (per-feature and .engineer/handoffs/) flagged human_action_needed: yessession-log.md entry per active feature ("Next tasks")NEEDS YOUR DECISION — blocked features; handoffs flagged human_action_needed.
These stall progress — surface them first.
READY TO ADVANCE — in-flight features sitting at a checkpoint that can proceed.
READY TO DISPATCH — features / consolidation tasks that can go to a remote agent
right now (bounded, automatable verification, no mid-stream
human input needed).
COULD START — the next consolidation-backlog item; parked ideas worth
promoting; fresh work.
Priority order:
target dates.Present the four buckets, then one top recommendation — the single best next action — with a one-line rationale and a suggested execution mode (you, local subagent, agent team, or remote).
next recommends; it does not act. The human picks, then invokes the relevant skill themselves (prime-context, discuss, feature-init, a consolidation task, …). No handoff is emitted.
NEEDS YOUR DECISION (1)
• 042-customer-export — plan.md has a charter deviation; approve amendment ADR-012 or revise
READY TO ADVANCE (1)
• 015-image-formats — at Checkpoint 2; ACs done, ready for atdd plugin -> atdd skill
READY TO DISPATCH (2)
• consolidation #1 core-image-generation — full ATDD coverage; remote one-shot
• consolidation #3 mcp-connector — remote one-shot
COULD START (1)
• parked: bulk-admin-export — discussed 3 weeks ago; promote if priorities allow
→ TOP PICK: approve/revise 042-customer-export's plan. It's blocking the
feature's whole pipeline, and it needs you specifically — 5 minutes now
unblocks an agent for hours. Then dispatch consolidation #1 to a remote agent.
prime-contextconsistency-check --projectsession-summarysession-summary — the session-end bookend.