菜单
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Validate the branch diff against the task's acceptance criteria before marking it done. Use when implementation looks complete, before a status update to done/awaiting_review, or when the user asks "did we cover everything?"
One-pass AI code review of a PR or branch diff (tech-lead style). Use when the user asks for a code review, PR review, AI review, or wants code quality, architecture, bugs, and patterns reviewed.
Simplify changed code in a PR or branch for readability while preserving behavior. Use when the user asks to simplify code, reduce complexity, clean up a PR, or improve readability of recent changes.
Capture new project-specific learnings into context files. Runs during reviews or after debugging to evolve the project's skill knowledge base. Use when the thread reveals patterns, anti-patterns, conventions, or codebase gotchas that should be remembered.
Debug pipeline: investigate (prod or local) → fix-issues → scoped polish (deslop + code-simplify) → pattern-check → kestral-sync retroactive capture. Only invoked by the kstack subagent.
Capture the decision when a spike, prototype, or investigation concludes. Use when a prototype or spike wraps up, the user makes a go/no-go call after de-risking, or an investigation answers its question — prompts "what did you decide?" and writes the decision + rationale to the task tracker.
| name | grill-me |
| kstack | true |
| description | Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me". |
Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the decision tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.
Ask the questions one at a time, waiting for feedback on each question before continuing. Asking multiple questions at once is bewildering.
If a fact can be found by exploring the environment (filesystem, tools, etc.), look it up rather than asking me. The decisions, though, are mine — put each one to me and wait for my answer.
Do not act on it until I confirm we have reached a shared understanding.
Read context.md and apply it as additional project-specific constraints layered on top of this
workflow. If it does not exist, skip this section.
