菜单
Send a file to codex (GPT-5.5) for review. Reports feedback — no changes until the user approves.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
Filter recent Hacker News for live threads on June's topics and hand him the list. Separately, flag the rare subset where work he has already done settles a specific quoted claim, and draft that comment as a plain argument with no link to his own writing. Use when June asks to check HN or find threads worth reading or commenting on.
Scan blog posts for AI writing tics and missed opportunities for human voice. Reports subtractions (AI patterns to remove) and additions (wordplay, arc, and claims to strengthen).
Poll June's Hacker News feeds, report what is new since the last run, and idempotently arm a background watch for replies to his comments. State persists in ~/Documents/sweep/ so it survives across sessions. Use when June asks what is new on HN, whether anyone replied, or to start watching a thread.
Argument-level compression by a strengthened absence test (does the argument stand with the same force, clarity, evidence, scope, pacing, and misreading-resistance?). Removes passages that fail it (self-referential cruft, cross-section restatement, self-recap, re-derivation, scaffolding, expired reader-orientation, stakes inflation, inert hedges, redundant examples); grafts good rhetoric onto an adjacent essential point rather than deleting. Idempotent. The structural cousin of /tighten (word-level) and /not-but (negation).
Audit a technical candidate's resume/CV by verifying its claims against the public contribution graph instead of taking the text at face value. Sorts every claim onto the self/peer/world attestation lattice, applies a cost-and-stake filter so cheap proxies (stars, downloads, backlinks) don't count, runs LIVE checks (GitHub, arXiv, package registries, CVEs), and reports two separate axes — merit (staked acceptance of the candidate's specific work) and attention (timestamped output) — plus a verifiability score in [0,1]. For technical recruiters and hiring managers. Invoke when given a candidate — a GitHub handle, a resume/CV, an arXiv author, a personal site — and asked to verify, audit, vet, or check their claims. Runs at two depths — a quick triage scan or a deep per-claim audit — and elicits which. Checks the provenance of a personal site or self-hosted resume (Internet Archive + git history) as an un-backdatable anti-tailoring anchor. Needs tool access (Bash/curl or WebFetch).
Find and defuse "not X but Y" / "isn't X; it's Y" / "X — not Y" constructions. Deterministic grep for detection (no LLM blind spot), the not-but subagent for triage. Split-or-cut tail negations ("X, not Y") aggressively — promote the point to its own sentence or delete it; recast in place only mid-clause "not X but Y" that genuinely can't be split; keep just the rare iconic thesis line literal.
| name | codex |
| description | Send a file to codex (GPT-5.5) for review. Reports feedback — no changes until the user approves. |
| argument-hint | ["file_path(s) or leave blank for in-context content"] |
| allowed-tools | Read, Bash, Glob, AskUserQuestion |
Send content to codex for a second opinion. Report the feedback verbatim. Don't change anything until the user approves.
Resolve the content. Three modes:
Build the prompt. Compose a single prompt that includes:
Send to codex. Pipe the prompt via stdin to avoid shell quoting issues:
cat <<'PROMPT_EOF' | codex exec -
Review the following. What works, what doesn't, what to cut, what to strengthen. Be direct — no preamble, no praise sandwich.
---
<content here>
PROMPT_EOF
For multiple files, include each with a filename header:
cat <<'PROMPT_EOF' | codex exec -
Review the following files together. What works, what doesn't, what to cut, what to strengthen. Be direct — no preamble, no praise sandwich.
--- file: path/to/first.md ---
<contents>
--- file: path/to/second.md ---
<contents>
PROMPT_EOF
| codex exec -) rather than inline quoting, to avoid shell escaping issues with large content.