菜单
Use when credible sources conflict, one artifact cannot establish a load-bearing claim, a claim gates a hard-to-reverse action, or the user challenges it.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Run a task autonomously with reversible defaults and a reviewable handback.
Turn an idea into an approved implementation spec through collaborative design.
Inspect and commit the intended local changes cleanly.
Diagnose bugs, test failures, and unexpected behavior from evidence before changing code.
Isolate independent or context-heavy work when parallelism or fresh context materially improves the task.
Capture hard-won engineering knowledge in durable project documentation.
| name | triangulate |
| description | Use when credible sources conflict, one artifact cannot establish a load-bearing claim, a claim gates a hard-to-reverse action, or the user challenges it. |
| argument-hint | [optional claim to audit] |
Match verification effort to the consequence of being wrong.
Before relying on a definite value or behavior, read its source-of-truth artifact in the current task: code, config, runtime output, screenshot, protocol, or official documentation. Most claims need nothing more.
Use multiple independent primary sources when:
State the claim narrowly, identify which evidence supports it, and preserve meaningful disagreement. Use a subagent when isolation or parallel source reading improves the result, not as a mandatory step.
Create a durable audit artifact only when the user requests one or the active specification needs the evidence for future implementation. Do not turn ordinary repository facts into audit bureaucracy.
